Contextual Effects in Recognition of Individuals in Gender-Typed Profession

<p>It is widely known that women are often discriminated against in the job market, but emerging research suggests that men may have similar experiences. In particular, men and women face employment discrimination when entering a field incongruent to their gender. While many studies have focused on describing the gender gap in the work force, fewer studies have focused on the basic cognitive processes related to discriminatory behavior. To build upon the idea that context plays a role in how easily individuals recognize stimuli and their attitudes towards these stimuli, the present study examines individual differences in sexism and contextual cueing as interacting phenomena. Participants completed a timed task in which they decided whether individuals in photographs matched particular career labels. When the photograph and career did not match in relation to gender (e.g., a man pictured as a nurse), the reaction time of the participant was slower than if the career-picture pair did match (e.g., a woman pictured as a nurse). However, sexism, as measured by Glick and Fiske's (1996) Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, was found to be a moderator of congruency effects. A proposed cognitive theory of the underlying processing differences between sexists and nonsexists is discussed, as well as implications for gender discrimination.</p>

Name thesis:degree_name

Master of Science in Experimental Psychology (M.S.)

Level thesis:degree_level

Thesis (restricted to Georgia Southern)

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

Department of Psychology

Year dc:date.available

2011

Author dc:creator

• Briley, Katherine E.

Contributors dc:contributor

• Karen Z. Naufel
• William D. McIntosh
• n/a

• ETD
• Gender roles
• Stereotypes
• Information processing
• contextual effects
• Psychology

Repository record dc:identifier

https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/447

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu:etd-1447