{"id":{"repo_id":"greece","oai_identifier":"oai:10442/1650"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/greece/oai:10442/1650","repository":{"repo_id":"greece","name":"Greek National Archive of PhD Theses","base_url":"https://phdtheses.ekt.gr/eadd_oai/request"},"display":{"title":"ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΑΚΥΡΟΤΗΤΑ. Η ΑΚΥΡΟΤΗΤΑ ΤΩΝ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΠΡΑΞΕΩΝ ΚΑΙ Η ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΑ ΑΡΘΡΑ 159 ΕΠ.ΚΠΟΛΔ","abstract":"ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEMS OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CONCERNS THE LIMITS OF THE PROCEDURAL FORMALITY AND ITS RELATION TO THE PROCEDURAL EQUITY AND FLEXIBILITY. THE POSSIBILITY TO REMEDY THE PROCEDURAL VIOLATIONS AND FAULTS IS INCLUDED IN THE ABOVE GENERAL PROBLEMATIC. THE PAR. 159-161 GR.CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE INTRODUCE EXTEND POSSIBILITIES TO REMEDY THE PROCEDURAL INVALIDITY. ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT IN THIS CONTEXT IS THE \"DAMAGE PRINCIPAL\", INTRODUCED BY PAR. 159.3 OFTHE GR.CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW. THE DISSERTATION PRESENTS THE EVOLUTION OF PAR. 159-161 WHICH IS A PART OF THE AVOVE GENERAL PROBLEMATIC (PAR. 1,2). THE DISSERTATION CONCLUDES THAT THE PAR. 159-161 AIM TO REMEDY THE PROCEDURAL BREACHES (ESPECIALLY IN PAR. 2, AND PAR. 5-8). THE PAR . 4 OF THE DISSERTATION COMPARES THE EQUIVALENT RULES IN THE GERMAN AND AUSTRIAN LAW. CONTINUING THE DISSERTATION (PAR. 5) EXAMINES THE MAIN APPLICATION CONDITIONS OF PAR. 156 FF, I.E. THE PROCEDURAL BREACH OR FAULT AND FURTHERMORE THE PHENOMENON OF THE FAULTY PROCEDURAL ACTION UNDER THE ASPECT OF THE ITS REMEDY POSSIBILITY ACCORDING TO PAR. 150-161 (PAR. 6). FROM THE SAME POINT OF VIEW IN THE DISSERTATION ARE BEING SEARCHED ANDCOMPARED THE VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE PROCEDURAL FAULT OR THE PROCEDURAL INVALIDITY (PAR. 7). FINALLY THE DISSERTATION ANALISES CLOSER THE MATTERS RELATED ESPECIALLY TO \"THE DAMAGE PRINCIPAL\", ACCORDING TO PAR. 159.3 (PAR. 8).","abstract_html":"ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEMS OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CONCERNS THE LIMITS OF THE PROCEDURAL FORMALITY AND ITS RELATION TO THE PROCEDURAL EQUITY AND FLEXIBILITY. THE POSSIBILITY TO REMEDY THE PROCEDURAL VIOLATIONS AND FAULTS IS INCLUDED IN THE ABOVE GENERAL PROBLEMATIC. THE PAR. 159-161 GR.CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE INTRODUCE EXTEND POSSIBILITIES TO REMEDY THE PROCEDURAL INVALIDITY. ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT IN THIS CONTEXT IS THE "DAMAGE PRINCIPAL", INTRODUCED BY PAR. 159.3 OFTHE GR.CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW. THE DISSERTATION PRESENTS THE EVOLUTION OF PAR. 159-161 WHICH IS A PART OF THE AVOVE GENERAL PROBLEMATIC (PAR. 1,2). THE DISSERTATION CONCLUDES THAT THE PAR. 159-161 AIM TO REMEDY THE PROCEDURAL BREACHES (ESPECIALLY IN PAR. 2, AND PAR. 5-8). THE PAR . 4 OF THE DISSERTATION COMPARES THE EQUIVALENT RULES IN THE GERMAN AND AUSTRIAN LAW. CONTINUING THE DISSERTATION (PAR. 5) EXAMINES THE MAIN APPLICATION CONDITIONS OF PAR. 156 FF, I.E. THE PROCEDURAL BREACH OR FAULT AND FURTHERMORE THE PHENOMENON OF THE FAULTY PROCEDURAL ACTION UNDER THE ASPECT OF THE ITS REMEDY POSSIBILITY ACCORDING TO PAR. 150-161 (PAR. 6). FROM THE SAME POINT OF VIEW IN THE DISSERTATION ARE BEING SEARCHED ANDCOMPARED THE VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE PROCEDURAL FAULT OR THE PROCEDURAL INVALIDITY (PAR. 7). FINALLY THE DISSERTATION ANALISES CLOSER THE MATTERS RELATED ESPECIALLY TO "THE DAMAGE PRINCIPAL", ACCORDING TO PAR. 159.3 (PAR. 8).","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Σοφιαλίδης, Απόστολος"],"institution":"Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki (AUTH)","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1990,"date_issued":"1990","date_published":"1990","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:25:02Z","subjects":["ΑΚΥΡΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΑΡΑΔΕΚΤΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΕΣ ΠΡΑΞΕΙΣ","ΑΚΥΡΟΤΗΤΑ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ","ΑΠΑΡΑΔΕΚΤΟ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΟ","ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΑΥΣΤΗΡΟΤΗΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΕΛΑΣΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑ","ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΕΛΑΤΤΩΜΑΤΩΝ &ΠΑΡΑΒΑΣΕΩΝ","ΛΟΓΟΙ ΚΑΙ ΣΥΝΕΠΕΙΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΕΛΑΤΤΩΜΑΤΩΝ","DEFECTIVE JUDICIAL ACTS AND THEIR REMEDY","INVALID AND INADMISSIBLE JUDICIAL ACTS","JUDICIAL INADMISSIBILITY","JUDICIAL INVALIDITY","JUDICIAL STRICTUESS AND CLEMENCY","REASONS AND CONSEQUENCES OF JUDICIAL DEFECTS","REMEDY OF JUDICIAL DEFECTS AND VIOLATIONS","Κοινωνικές Επιστήμες","Νομική Επιστήμη","Social Sciences","Law"],"languages":["gre"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["10.12681/eadd/1650"],"render_values":[{"text":"10.12681/eadd/1650","href":"https://doi.org/10.12681/eadd/1650","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/1650","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Σοφιαλίδης, Απόστολος"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["1990"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki (AUTH)","Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης (ΑΠΘ)"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["PhD Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["ΑΚΥΡΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΑΡΑΔΕΚΤΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΕΣ ΠΡΑΞΕΙΣ","ΑΚΥΡΟΤΗΤΑ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ","ΑΠΑΡΑΔΕΚΤΟ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΟ","ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΑΥΣΤΗΡΟΤΗΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΕΛΑΣΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑ","ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΕΛΑΤΤΩΜΑΤΩΝ &ΠΑΡΑΒΑΣΕΩΝ","ΛΟΓΟΙ ΚΑΙ ΣΥΝΕΠΕΙΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΕΛΑΤΤΩΜΑΤΩΝ","DEFECTIVE JUDICIAL ACTS AND THEIR REMEDY","INVALID AND INADMISSIBLE JUDICIAL ACTS","JUDICIAL INADMISSIBILITY","JUDICIAL INVALIDITY","JUDICIAL STRICTUESS AND CLEMENCY","REASONS AND CONSEQUENCES OF JUDICIAL DEFECTS","REMEDY OF JUDICIAL DEFECTS AND VIOLATIONS","Κοινωνικές Επιστήμες","Νομική Επιστήμη","Social Sciences","Law"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["gre"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["10.12681/eadd/1650","http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/1650"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEMS OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CONCERNS THE LIMITS OF THE PROCEDURAL FORMALITY AND ITS RELATION TO THE PROCEDURAL EQUITY AND FLEXIBILITY. THE POSSIBILITY TO REMEDY THE PROCEDURAL VIOLATIONS AND FAULTS IS INCLUDED IN THE ABOVE GENERAL PROBLEMATIC. THE PAR. 159-161 GR.CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE INTRODUCE EXTEND POSSIBILITIES TO REMEDY THE PROCEDURAL INVALIDITY. ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT IN THIS CONTEXT IS THE \"DAMAGE PRINCIPAL\", INTRODUCED BY PAR. 159.3 OFTHE GR.CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW. THE DISSERTATION PRESENTS THE EVOLUTION OF PAR. 159-161 WHICH IS A PART OF THE AVOVE GENERAL PROBLEMATIC (PAR. 1,2). THE DISSERTATION CONCLUDES THAT THE PAR. 159-161 AIM TO REMEDY THE PROCEDURAL BREACHES (ESPECIALLY IN PAR. 2, AND PAR. 5-8). THE PAR . 4 OF THE DISSERTATION COMPARES THE EQUIVALENT RULES IN THE GERMAN AND AUSTRIAN LAW. CONTINUING THE DISSERTATION (PAR. 5) EXAMINES THE MAIN APPLICATION CONDITIONS OF PAR. 156 FF, I.E. THE PROCEDURAL BREACH OR FAULT AND FURTHERMORE THE PHENOMENON OF THE FAULTY PROCEDURAL ACTION UNDER THE ASPECT OF THE ITS REMEDY POSSIBILITY ACCORDING TO PAR. 150-161 (PAR. 6). FROM THE SAME POINT OF VIEW IN THE DISSERTATION ARE BEING SEARCHED ANDCOMPARED THE VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE PROCEDURAL FAULT OR THE PROCEDURAL INVALIDITY (PAR. 7). FINALLY THE DISSERTATION ANALISES CLOSER THE MATTERS RELATED ESPECIALLY TO \"THE DAMAGE PRINCIPAL\", ACCORDING TO PAR. 159.3 (PAR. 8).","ΕΝΑ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΣΟΒΑΡΟΤΕΡΑ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΑ ΤΟΥ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΟΥ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΥΤΟ ΠΟΥ ΑΝΑΓΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΑ ΟΡΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΗΣ ΑΥΣΤΗΡΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΗ ΣΧΕΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΜΕ ΤΗ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΕΙΚΕΙΑ 'Η ΕΛΑΣΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑ. Η ΔΥΝΑΤΟΤΗΤΑ ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΠΑΡΑΒΑΣΕΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΕΛΑΤΤΩΜΑΤΩΝ ΕΝΤΑΣΣΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΑ ΠΛΑΙΣΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΑΝΩΤΕΡΩ ΓΕΝΙΚΟΥ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΙΣΜΟΥ. ΟΙ ΔΙΑΤΑΞΕΙΣ ΤΩΝ ΑΡΘΡ. 159-161 ΚΠΟΛΔ ΕΙΣΑΓΟΥΝ ΕΥΡΕΙΕΣ ΔΥΝΑΤΟΤΗΤΕΣ ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑΣ ΣΤΙΣ ΠΕΡΙΠΤΩΣΕΙΣ ΤΗΣ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗΣ ΑΚΥΡΟΤΗΤΑΣ. ΙΔΙΑΙΤΕΡΑ ΑΞΙΟΛΟΓΗ ΠΡΟΣ ΑΥΤΗ ΤΗΝ ΚΑΤΕΥΘΥΝΣΗ ΕΙΝΑΙ Η \"ΑΡΧΗ ΤΗΣ ΒΛΑΒΗΣ\" ΠΟΥ ΚΑΘΙΕΡΩΝΕΤΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΑΡΘΡ. 159-161 ΚΠΟΛΔ ΚΑΙ ΕΝΤΑΣΣΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΟΝ ΓΕΝΙΚΟ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΙΣΜΟ ΠΟΥ ΠΡΟΑΝΑΦΕΡΘΗΚΕ (ΠΑΡ. 1-2), ΘΕΜΕΛΙΩΝΕΤΑΙ ΤΟ ΣΥΜΠΕΡΑΣΜΑ ΟΤΙ ΟΙ ΔΙΑΤΑΞΕΙΣ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΠΟΣΚΟΠΟΥΝ ΣΤΗ ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΠΑΡΑΒΑΣΕΩΝ (ΚΥΡΙΩΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΠΑΡ. 2 ΑΛΛΑ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΙΣ ΠΑΡ. 5 - 8) ΚΑΙ ΓΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΣΥΓΚΡΙΣΗ ΜΕ ΑΝΤΙΣΤΟΙΧΕΣ ΔΙΑΤΑΞΕΙΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΡΧΕΣ ΤΟΥ ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΚΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΑΥΣΤΡΙΑΚΟΥ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΟΥ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥ (ΣΤΗΝ ΠΑΡ. 4 ΚΥΡΙΩΣ). ΣΤΗΝ ΣΥΝΕΧΕΙΑ ΕΞΕΤΑΖΟΝΤΑΙ ΟΙ ΘΕΜΕΛΙΩΔΕΙΣ ΠΡΟΥΠΟΘΕΣΕΙΣ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΓΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΑΡΘΡ. 159 ΕΠ., ΔΗΛ. Η ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΗ ΠΑΡΑΒΑΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΕΛΑΤΤΩΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑ (ΠΑΡ. 5) ΚΑΙ ΕΡΕΥΝΑΤΑΙ ΕΙΔΙΚΟΤΕΡΑ ΤΟ ΦΑΙΝΟΜΕΝΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΑΤΤΩΜΑΤΙΚΗΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΗΣ ΠΡΑΞΗΣΑΠΟ ΤΗ ΣΚΟΠΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΔΥΝΑΤΟΤΗΤΩΝ ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΤ'ΕΦΑΡΜΟΓΗ ΤΩΝ ΑΡΘΡ. 159-161 ΚΠΟΛΔ (ΠΑΡ. 6). ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΙΔΙΑ ΣΚΟΠΙΑ ΕΡΕΥΝΩΝΤΑΙ ΣΥΝΟΛΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΣΥΓΚΡΙΝΟΝΤΑΙ ΟΙ ΔΙΑΦΟΡΕΣ ΜΟΡΦΕΣ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗΣ ΕΛΑΤΤΩΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ 'Η ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΟΥ ΑΝΙΣΧΥΡΟΥ (ΣΤΗΝ ΠΑΡ. 7) ΚΑΙ ΤΕΛΟΣ ΑΝΑΛΥΟΝΤΑΙ ΤΑ ΖΗΤΗΜΑΤΑ ΠΟΥ ΑΦΟΡΟΥΝ ΕΙΔΙΚΟΤΕΡΑ ΣΤΗΝ \"ΑΡΧΗ ΤΗΣ ΒΛΑΒΗΣ\" ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟ ΑΡΘΡ. 159.3 (ΣΤΗΝ ΠΑΡ. 8)."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΑΚΥΡΟΤΗΤΑ. Η ΑΚΥΡΟΤΗΤΑ ΤΩΝ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΠΡΑΞΕΩΝ ΚΑΙ Η ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΑ ΑΡΘΡΑ 159 ΕΠ.ΚΠΟΛΔ","JUDICIAL INVALIDITY. INVALIDITY OF JUDICIAL ACTS AND THEIR REMEDY ACCORDING TO ARTICLES 159-161 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Σοφιαλίδης, Απόστολος"],"dc:date":["1990"],"dc:description":["ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEMS OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CONCERNS THE LIMITS OF THE PROCEDURAL FORMALITY AND ITS RELATION TO THE PROCEDURAL EQUITY AND FLEXIBILITY. THE POSSIBILITY TO REMEDY THE PROCEDURAL VIOLATIONS AND FAULTS IS INCLUDED IN THE ABOVE GENERAL PROBLEMATIC. THE PAR. 159-161 GR.CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE INTRODUCE EXTEND POSSIBILITIES TO REMEDY THE PROCEDURAL INVALIDITY. ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT IN THIS CONTEXT IS THE \"DAMAGE PRINCIPAL\", INTRODUCED BY PAR. 159.3 OFTHE GR.CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW. THE DISSERTATION PRESENTS THE EVOLUTION OF PAR. 159-161 WHICH IS A PART OF THE AVOVE GENERAL PROBLEMATIC (PAR. 1,2). THE DISSERTATION CONCLUDES THAT THE PAR. 159-161 AIM TO REMEDY THE PROCEDURAL BREACHES (ESPECIALLY IN PAR. 2, AND PAR. 5-8). THE PAR . 4 OF THE DISSERTATION COMPARES THE EQUIVALENT RULES IN THE GERMAN AND AUSTRIAN LAW. CONTINUING THE DISSERTATION (PAR. 5) EXAMINES THE MAIN APPLICATION CONDITIONS OF PAR. 156 FF, I.E. THE PROCEDURAL BREACH OR FAULT AND FURTHERMORE THE PHENOMENON OF THE FAULTY PROCEDURAL ACTION UNDER THE ASPECT OF THE ITS REMEDY POSSIBILITY ACCORDING TO PAR. 150-161 (PAR. 6). FROM THE SAME POINT OF VIEW IN THE DISSERTATION ARE BEING SEARCHED ANDCOMPARED THE VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE PROCEDURAL FAULT OR THE PROCEDURAL INVALIDITY (PAR. 7). FINALLY THE DISSERTATION ANALISES CLOSER THE MATTERS RELATED ESPECIALLY TO \"THE DAMAGE PRINCIPAL\", ACCORDING TO PAR. 159.3 (PAR. 8).","ΕΝΑ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΣΟΒΑΡΟΤΕΡΑ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΑ ΤΟΥ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΟΥ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΥΤΟ ΠΟΥ ΑΝΑΓΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΑ ΟΡΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΗΣ ΑΥΣΤΗΡΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΗ ΣΧΕΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΜΕ ΤΗ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΕΙΚΕΙΑ 'Η ΕΛΑΣΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑ. Η ΔΥΝΑΤΟΤΗΤΑ ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΠΑΡΑΒΑΣΕΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΕΛΑΤΤΩΜΑΤΩΝ ΕΝΤΑΣΣΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΑ ΠΛΑΙΣΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΑΝΩΤΕΡΩ ΓΕΝΙΚΟΥ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΙΣΜΟΥ. ΟΙ ΔΙΑΤΑΞΕΙΣ ΤΩΝ ΑΡΘΡ. 159-161 ΚΠΟΛΔ ΕΙΣΑΓΟΥΝ ΕΥΡΕΙΕΣ ΔΥΝΑΤΟΤΗΤΕΣ ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑΣ ΣΤΙΣ ΠΕΡΙΠΤΩΣΕΙΣ ΤΗΣ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗΣ ΑΚΥΡΟΤΗΤΑΣ. ΙΔΙΑΙΤΕΡΑ ΑΞΙΟΛΟΓΗ ΠΡΟΣ ΑΥΤΗ ΤΗΝ ΚΑΤΕΥΘΥΝΣΗ ΕΙΝΑΙ Η \"ΑΡΧΗ ΤΗΣ ΒΛΑΒΗΣ\" ΠΟΥ ΚΑΘΙΕΡΩΝΕΤΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΑΡΘΡ. 159-161 ΚΠΟΛΔ ΚΑΙ ΕΝΤΑΣΣΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΟΝ ΓΕΝΙΚΟ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΙΣΜΟ ΠΟΥ ΠΡΟΑΝΑΦΕΡΘΗΚΕ (ΠΑΡ. 1-2), ΘΕΜΕΛΙΩΝΕΤΑΙ ΤΟ ΣΥΜΠΕΡΑΣΜΑ ΟΤΙ ΟΙ ΔΙΑΤΑΞΕΙΣ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΠΟΣΚΟΠΟΥΝ ΣΤΗ ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΠΑΡΑΒΑΣΕΩΝ (ΚΥΡΙΩΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΠΑΡ. 2 ΑΛΛΑ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΙΣ ΠΑΡ. 5 - 8) ΚΑΙ ΓΙΝΕΤΑΙ ΣΥΓΚΡΙΣΗ ΜΕ ΑΝΤΙΣΤΟΙΧΕΣ ΔΙΑΤΑΞΕΙΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΡΧΕΣ ΤΟΥ ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΚΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΑΥΣΤΡΙΑΚΟΥ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΟΥ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥ (ΣΤΗΝ ΠΑΡ. 4 ΚΥΡΙΩΣ). ΣΤΗΝ ΣΥΝΕΧΕΙΑ ΕΞΕΤΑΖΟΝΤΑΙ ΟΙ ΘΕΜΕΛΙΩΔΕΙΣ ΠΡΟΥΠΟΘΕΣΕΙΣ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΓΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΑΡΘΡ. 159 ΕΠ., ΔΗΛ. Η ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΗ ΠΑΡΑΒΑΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΕΛΑΤΤΩΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑ (ΠΑΡ. 5) ΚΑΙ ΕΡΕΥΝΑΤΑΙ ΕΙΔΙΚΟΤΕΡΑ ΤΟ ΦΑΙΝΟΜΕΝΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΑΤΤΩΜΑΤΙΚΗΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΗΣ ΠΡΑΞΗΣΑΠΟ ΤΗ ΣΚΟΠΙΑ ΤΩΝ ΔΥΝΑΤΟΤΗΤΩΝ ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΤ'ΕΦΑΡΜΟΓΗ ΤΩΝ ΑΡΘΡ. 159-161 ΚΠΟΛΔ (ΠΑΡ. 6). ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΙΔΙΑ ΣΚΟΠΙΑ ΕΡΕΥΝΩΝΤΑΙ ΣΥΝΟΛΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΣΥΓΚΡΙΝΟΝΤΑΙ ΟΙ ΔΙΑΦΟΡΕΣ ΜΟΡΦΕΣ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗΣ ΕΛΑΤΤΩΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ 'Η ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΟΥ ΑΝΙΣΧΥΡΟΥ (ΣΤΗΝ ΠΑΡ. 7) ΚΑΙ ΤΕΛΟΣ ΑΝΑΛΥΟΝΤΑΙ ΤΑ ΖΗΤΗΜΑΤΑ ΠΟΥ ΑΦΟΡΟΥΝ ΕΙΔΙΚΟΤΕΡΑ ΣΤΗΝ \"ΑΡΧΗ ΤΗΣ ΒΛΑΒΗΣ\" ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟ ΑΡΘΡ. 159.3 (ΣΤΗΝ ΠΑΡ. 8)."],"dc:identifier":["10.12681/eadd/1650","http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/1650"],"dc:language":["gre"],"dc:publisher":["Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki (AUTH)","Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης (ΑΠΘ)"],"dc:subject":["ΑΚΥΡΕΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΑΡΑΔΕΚΤΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΕΣ ΠΡΑΞΕΙΣ","ΑΚΥΡΟΤΗΤΑ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ","ΑΠΑΡΑΔΕΚΤΟ ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΟ","ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΑΥΣΤΗΡΟΤΗΤΑ ΚΑΙ ΕΛΑΣΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑ","ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΕΛΑΤΤΩΜΑΤΩΝ &ΠΑΡΑΒΑΣΕΩΝ","ΛΟΓΟΙ ΚΑΙ ΣΥΝΕΠΕΙΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΕΛΑΤΤΩΜΑΤΩΝ","DEFECTIVE JUDICIAL ACTS AND THEIR REMEDY","INVALID AND INADMISSIBLE JUDICIAL ACTS","JUDICIAL INADMISSIBILITY","JUDICIAL INVALIDITY","JUDICIAL STRICTUESS AND CLEMENCY","REASONS AND CONSEQUENCES OF JUDICIAL DEFECTS","REMEDY OF JUDICIAL DEFECTS AND VIOLATIONS","Κοινωνικές Επιστήμες","Νομική Επιστήμη","Social Sciences","Law"],"dc:title":["ΔΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΑΚΥΡΟΤΗΤΑ. Η ΑΚΥΡΟΤΗΤΑ ΤΩΝ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΠΡΑΞΕΩΝ ΚΑΙ Η ΘΕΡΑΠΕΙΑ ΤΗΣ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΑ ΑΡΘΡΑ 159 ΕΠ.ΚΠΟΛΔ","JUDICIAL INVALIDITY. INVALIDITY OF JUDICIAL ACTS AND THEIR REMEDY ACCORDING TO ARTICLES 159-161 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE"],"dc:type":["PhD Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:25:02Z"}