{"id":{"repo_id":"greece","oai_identifier":"oai:10442/1180"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/greece/oai:10442/1180","repository":{"repo_id":"greece","name":"Greek National Archive of PhD Theses","base_url":"https://phdtheses.ekt.gr/eadd_oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Ο ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΥ. ΜΕΛΕΤΗ ΣΥΓΚΡΙΤΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΥ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟ ΔΙΚΑΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ, ΤΗΣ ΓΑΛΛΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΟΜΟΣΠΟΝΔΙΑΚΗΣ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑΣ","abstract":"THE JUDGEMENT WHETHER A LAW IS CONFORM OR NOT TO THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT ONLY THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL POWER IN A STATE. THERE ARE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW, WHICH ARE USUALLY NEGLECTED BY THE THEORY OF HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL REASONS: ONE OF THEM IS THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITYOF LAWS. WHAT PROCEEDINGS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF LAWS CAN BE QUALIFIED ASPOLITICAL CANNOT BE DETERMINED ON THE BASIS OF THE CLASSICAL CRITERIA (ORGAN/FUNCTION) BUT ON THE BASIS OF A \"BUNCH OF INDICATIONS\" THAT GO BACK TO THE HISTORICAL, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL RATIO OF THE PROCEEDING CONCERNED. ON THAT BASIS WECAN QUALIFY AS POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS. THE CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF LAWS BY THE PARLIAMENT (ONE OR TWO CHAMBERS) AND BY THE HEAD OF THE STATE, EXERCISED EITHER IN A LATEST WAY, OR BY THE GENERAL LEGISLATIVE PROCEEDINGS, OR BY SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS SET BY THE CONSTITUTION AND THE STATUTES OF THE PARLIAMENT. THE METHODS AS WELL AS THE LIMITS OF THESE PROCEEDINGS OF POLITICAL REVIEW REFLECT THE PARTICULARITY OF THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY WHICH COMES FROM THE FACT THAT THE ORGANS CONCERNED HAVE A DEMOCRATICLEGITIMATION AND ARE CHARGED WITH THE LEGISLATIVE FUNCTION IN THE STATE. THEREFORE THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS IS THE REGULAR, PERMANENT AND CONSTANT CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN THE STATE AND MUST BE CONSIDERED AS AN INSTITUTIONAL CARE FOR THE LEGAL APPLICATION AND ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION. THUS, IT MUST BE POINTED OUT THAT THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS IS A LEGAL SYLLOGISM SUCH AS THE JUDICIAL REVIEW, THOUGH POLITICAL ARGUMENTS MIGHT BE TAKEN IN CONSIDERATION IN A LARGE WAY THAN BY THE JUDGES.","abstract_html":"THE JUDGEMENT WHETHER A LAW IS CONFORM OR NOT TO THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT ONLY THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL POWER IN A STATE. THERE ARE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW, WHICH ARE USUALLY NEGLECTED BY THE THEORY OF HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL REASONS: ONE OF THEM IS THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITYOF LAWS. WHAT PROCEEDINGS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF LAWS CAN BE QUALIFIED ASPOLITICAL CANNOT BE DETERMINED ON THE BASIS OF THE CLASSICAL CRITERIA (ORGAN/FUNCTION) BUT ON THE BASIS OF A "BUNCH OF INDICATIONS" THAT GO BACK TO THE HISTORICAL, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL RATIO OF THE PROCEEDING CONCERNED. ON THAT BASIS WECAN QUALIFY AS POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS. THE CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF LAWS BY THE PARLIAMENT (ONE OR TWO CHAMBERS) AND BY THE HEAD OF THE STATE, EXERCISED EITHER IN A LATEST WAY, OR BY THE GENERAL LEGISLATIVE PROCEEDINGS, OR BY SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS SET BY THE CONSTITUTION AND THE STATUTES OF THE PARLIAMENT. THE METHODS AS WELL AS THE LIMITS OF THESE PROCEEDINGS OF POLITICAL REVIEW REFLECT THE PARTICULARITY OF THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY WHICH COMES FROM THE FACT THAT THE ORGANS CONCERNED HAVE A DEMOCRATICLEGITIMATION AND ARE CHARGED WITH THE LEGISLATIVE FUNCTION IN THE STATE. THEREFORE THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS IS THE REGULAR, PERMANENT AND CONSTANT CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN THE STATE AND MUST BE CONSIDERED AS AN INSTITUTIONAL CARE FOR THE LEGAL APPLICATION AND ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION. THUS, IT MUST BE POINTED OUT THAT THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS IS A LEGAL SYLLOGISM SUCH AS THE JUDICIAL REVIEW, THOUGH POLITICAL ARGUMENTS MIGHT BE TAKEN IN CONSIDERATION IN A LARGE WAY THAN BY THE JUDGES.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Κανελλοπούλου, Μαρία-Νέδα"],"institution":"Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki (AUTH)","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1989,"date_issued":"1989","date_published":"1989","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:24:46Z","subjects":["ΑΝΑΠΟΜΠΗ ΝΟΜΟΣΧΕΔΙΟΥ Η ΠΡΟΤΑΣΗΣ ΝΟΜΟΥ ΣΤΗ ΒΟΥΛΗ","ΑΡΝΗΣΗ ΕΚΔΟΣΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΝΟΜΩΝ","ΕΝΣΤΑΣΗ ΑΝΤΙΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΣΤΗ ΒΟΥΛΗ","ΕΝΣΤΑΣΗ ΑΠΑΡΑΔΕΚΤΟΥ ΣΤΗ ΒΟΥΛΗ","CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF LAWS BY THE PARLIAMENT","Κοινωνικές Επιστήμες","Νομική Επιστήμη","Social Sciences","Law"],"languages":["gre"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["10.12681/eadd/1180"],"render_values":[{"text":"10.12681/eadd/1180","href":"https://doi.org/10.12681/eadd/1180","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/1180","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Κανελλοπούλου, Μαρία-Νέδα"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["1989"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki (AUTH)","Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης (ΑΠΘ)"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["PhD Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["ΑΝΑΠΟΜΠΗ ΝΟΜΟΣΧΕΔΙΟΥ Η ΠΡΟΤΑΣΗΣ ΝΟΜΟΥ ΣΤΗ ΒΟΥΛΗ","ΑΡΝΗΣΗ ΕΚΔΟΣΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΝΟΜΩΝ","ΕΝΣΤΑΣΗ ΑΝΤΙΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΣΤΗ ΒΟΥΛΗ","ΕΝΣΤΑΣΗ ΑΠΑΡΑΔΕΚΤΟΥ ΣΤΗ ΒΟΥΛΗ","CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF LAWS BY THE PARLIAMENT","Κοινωνικές Επιστήμες","Νομική Επιστήμη","Social Sciences","Law"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["gre"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["10.12681/eadd/1180","http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/1180"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["THE JUDGEMENT WHETHER A LAW IS CONFORM OR NOT TO THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT ONLY THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL POWER IN A STATE. THERE ARE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW, WHICH ARE USUALLY NEGLECTED BY THE THEORY OF HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL REASONS: ONE OF THEM IS THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITYOF LAWS. WHAT PROCEEDINGS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF LAWS CAN BE QUALIFIED ASPOLITICAL CANNOT BE DETERMINED ON THE BASIS OF THE CLASSICAL CRITERIA (ORGAN/FUNCTION) BUT ON THE BASIS OF A \"BUNCH OF INDICATIONS\" THAT GO BACK TO THE HISTORICAL, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL RATIO OF THE PROCEEDING CONCERNED. ON THAT BASIS WECAN QUALIFY AS POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS. THE CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF LAWS BY THE PARLIAMENT (ONE OR TWO CHAMBERS) AND BY THE HEAD OF THE STATE, EXERCISED EITHER IN A LATEST WAY, OR BY THE GENERAL LEGISLATIVE PROCEEDINGS, OR BY SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS SET BY THE CONSTITUTION AND THE STATUTES OF THE PARLIAMENT. THE METHODS AS WELL AS THE LIMITS OF THESE PROCEEDINGS OF POLITICAL REVIEW REFLECT THE PARTICULARITY OF THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY WHICH COMES FROM THE FACT THAT THE ORGANS CONCERNED HAVE A DEMOCRATICLEGITIMATION AND ARE CHARGED WITH THE LEGISLATIVE FUNCTION IN THE STATE. THEREFORE THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS IS THE REGULAR, PERMANENT AND CONSTANT CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN THE STATE AND MUST BE CONSIDERED AS AN INSTITUTIONAL CARE FOR THE LEGAL APPLICATION AND ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION. THUS, IT MUST BE POINTED OUT THAT THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS IS A LEGAL SYLLOGISM SUCH AS THE JUDICIAL REVIEW, THOUGH POLITICAL ARGUMENTS MIGHT BE TAKEN IN CONSIDERATION IN A LARGE WAY THAN BY THE JUDGES.","Η ΚΡΙΣΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΗ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑ ΤΩΝ ΝΟΜΩΝ ΜΕΣΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΠΟΛΙΤΕΙΑ ΔΕΝ ΕΞΑΝΤΛΕΙΤΑΙ ΜΕΤΟΝ ΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΟ ΕΛΕΓΧΟ. ΤΟ ΔΙΚΑΙΟ ΑΝΑΓΝΩΡΙΖΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΑΛΛΕΣ ΜΟΡΦΕΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΩΝ ΝΟΜΩΝ, ΠΟΥ ΓΙΑ ΛΟΓΟΥΣ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΟ-ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥΣ ΒΡΙΣΚΟΝΤΑΙ ΟΜΩΣ ΠΑΡΑΓΝΩΡΙΣΜΕΝΕΣ ΣΕ ΣΧΕΣΗ ΜΕ ΤΟΝ ΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΟ ΕΛΕΓΧΟ: ΤΕΤΟΙΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΚΑΙ Ο \"ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΣ\" ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΩΝ ΝΟΜΩΝ. Ο ΠΡΟΣΔΙΟΡΙΣΜΟΣ ΤΩΝ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΩΝ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΩΝ ΝΟΜΩΝ ΠΟΥ ΧΑΡΑΚΤΗΡΙΖΟΝΤΑΙ ΩΣ ΜΟΡΦΕΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥ-ΚΑΤ'ΑΝΑΛΟΓΙΑ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΙΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ ΠΟΥ ΧΑΡΑΚΤΗΡΙΖΟΝΤΑΙ ΩΣ ΜΟΡΦΕΣ ΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΟΥ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥ- ΔΕΝ ΠΡΟΚΥΠΤΕΙ ΜΕ ΑΣΦΑΛΕΙΑ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΓΗ ΤΩΝ ΚΛΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΚΡΙΤΗΡΙΩΝ (ΤΟΥ ΟΡΓΑΝΙΚΟΥ, ΤΟΥ ΤΥΠΙΚΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥ ΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΚΟΥ ΚΡΙΤΗΡΙΟΥ) ΠΡΟΚΥΠΤΕΙ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΓΗ ΜΙΑΣ \"ΔΕΣΜΗΣ ΕΝΔΕΙΞΕΩΝ\" ΠΟΥ ΑΝΑΓΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΗ, ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΗ ΚΑΙ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ RATIO ΤΩΝ ΣΧΕΤΙΚΩΝ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΩΝ, ΚΑΘ'ΥΠΕΡΒΑΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΚΛΑΣΙΚΗΣ ΔΙΑΚΡΙΣΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΩΝ. ΣΤΙΣ ΤΡΕΙΣ ΧΩΡΕΣ ΠΟΥ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΟΥΝ ΑΝΤΙΚΕΙΜΕΝΟ ΣΥΓΚΡΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΜΕΛΕΤΗΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ(ΕΛΛΑΔΑ, ΓΑΛΛΙΑ, Ο.Δ.Γ.) ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΥ ΕΙΝΑΙ Ο ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΥ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΚΟΙΝΟΒΟΥΛΙΟ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΝ ΑΡΧΗΓΟ ΤΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ. Ο ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΑΣΚΕΙΤΑΙ ΗΤΙ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΡΟΠΟ ΛΑΝΘΑΝΟΝΤΑ (ΤΕΚΜΗΡΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΩΝ ΝΟΜΩΝ), ΕΙΤΕ ΜΕ ΤΙΣ ΓΕΝΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ ΠΑΡΑΓΩΓΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΥ (ΣΗΜΕΙΩΝΕΤΑΙ ΙΔΙΑΙΤΕΡΑ Ο ΡΟΛΟΣ ΕΝΟΣ ΔΕΥΤΕΡΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΘΕΤΙΚΟΥΣΩΜΑΤΟΣ 'Η ΜΙΑΣ ΔΕΥΤΕΡΗΣ ΒΟΥΛΗΣ ΚΑΘΩΣ ΚΑΙ Ο ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΝ ΑΡΧΗΓΟ ΤΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣΚΑΤΑ ΤΗΝ ΕΚΔΟΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΥ), ΕΙΤΕ ΜΕ ΕΙΔΙΚΕΣ ΤΥΠΟΠΟΙΗΜΕΝΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ (ΕΚΤΑΣΗ ΑΝΤΙΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΕΝΣΤΑΣΕΙΣ ΑΠΑΡΑΔΕΚΤΟΥ ΣΤΗ ΒΟΥΛΗ, ΑΡΜΟΔΙΟΤΗΤΑ ΑΝΑΠΟΜΠΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΥ ΣΤΗ ΒΟΥΛΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΝ ΑΡΧΗΓΟ ΤΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ). (ΠΕΡΙΚΟΠΗ)"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Ο ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΥ. ΜΕΛΕΤΗ ΣΥΓΚΡΙΤΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΥ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟ ΔΙΚΑΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ, ΤΗΣ ΓΑΛΛΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΟΜΟΣΠΟΝΔΙΑΚΗΣ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑΣ","THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE LAW. A STUDY OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF GREECE, FRANCE AND THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Κανελλοπούλου, Μαρία-Νέδα"],"dc:date":["1989"],"dc:description":["THE JUDGEMENT WHETHER A LAW IS CONFORM OR NOT TO THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT ONLY THE MATTER OF THE JUDICIAL POWER IN A STATE. THERE ARE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW, WHICH ARE USUALLY NEGLECTED BY THE THEORY OF HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL REASONS: ONE OF THEM IS THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITYOF LAWS. WHAT PROCEEDINGS OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF LAWS CAN BE QUALIFIED ASPOLITICAL CANNOT BE DETERMINED ON THE BASIS OF THE CLASSICAL CRITERIA (ORGAN/FUNCTION) BUT ON THE BASIS OF A \"BUNCH OF INDICATIONS\" THAT GO BACK TO THE HISTORICAL, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL RATIO OF THE PROCEEDING CONCERNED. ON THAT BASIS WECAN QUALIFY AS POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS. THE CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF LAWS BY THE PARLIAMENT (ONE OR TWO CHAMBERS) AND BY THE HEAD OF THE STATE, EXERCISED EITHER IN A LATEST WAY, OR BY THE GENERAL LEGISLATIVE PROCEEDINGS, OR BY SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS SET BY THE CONSTITUTION AND THE STATUTES OF THE PARLIAMENT. THE METHODS AS WELL AS THE LIMITS OF THESE PROCEEDINGS OF POLITICAL REVIEW REFLECT THE PARTICULARITY OF THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY WHICH COMES FROM THE FACT THAT THE ORGANS CONCERNED HAVE A DEMOCRATICLEGITIMATION AND ARE CHARGED WITH THE LEGISLATIVE FUNCTION IN THE STATE. THEREFORE THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS IS THE REGULAR, PERMANENT AND CONSTANT CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN THE STATE AND MUST BE CONSIDERED AS AN INSTITUTIONAL CARE FOR THE LEGAL APPLICATION AND ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION. THUS, IT MUST BE POINTED OUT THAT THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS IS A LEGAL SYLLOGISM SUCH AS THE JUDICIAL REVIEW, THOUGH POLITICAL ARGUMENTS MIGHT BE TAKEN IN CONSIDERATION IN A LARGE WAY THAN BY THE JUDGES.","Η ΚΡΙΣΗ ΓΙΑ ΤΗ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑ ΤΩΝ ΝΟΜΩΝ ΜΕΣΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΠΟΛΙΤΕΙΑ ΔΕΝ ΕΞΑΝΤΛΕΙΤΑΙ ΜΕΤΟΝ ΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΟ ΕΛΕΓΧΟ. ΤΟ ΔΙΚΑΙΟ ΑΝΑΓΝΩΡΙΖΕΙ ΚΑΙ ΑΛΛΕΣ ΜΟΡΦΕΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΩΝ ΝΟΜΩΝ, ΠΟΥ ΓΙΑ ΛΟΓΟΥΣ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΟ-ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥΣ ΒΡΙΣΚΟΝΤΑΙ ΟΜΩΣ ΠΑΡΑΓΝΩΡΙΣΜΕΝΕΣ ΣΕ ΣΧΕΣΗ ΜΕ ΤΟΝ ΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΟ ΕΛΕΓΧΟ: ΤΕΤΟΙΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΚΑΙ Ο \"ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΣ\" ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΩΝ ΝΟΜΩΝ. Ο ΠΡΟΣΔΙΟΡΙΣΜΟΣ ΤΩΝ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΩΝ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΩΝ ΝΟΜΩΝ ΠΟΥ ΧΑΡΑΚΤΗΡΙΖΟΝΤΑΙ ΩΣ ΜΟΡΦΕΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥ-ΚΑΤ'ΑΝΑΛΟΓΙΑ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΙΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ ΠΟΥ ΧΑΡΑΚΤΗΡΙΖΟΝΤΑΙ ΩΣ ΜΟΡΦΕΣ ΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΟΥ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥ- ΔΕΝ ΠΡΟΚΥΠΤΕΙ ΜΕ ΑΣΦΑΛΕΙΑ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΓΗ ΤΩΝ ΚΛΑΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΚΡΙΤΗΡΙΩΝ (ΤΟΥ ΟΡΓΑΝΙΚΟΥ, ΤΟΥ ΤΥΠΙΚΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥ ΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΚΟΥ ΚΡΙΤΗΡΙΟΥ) ΠΡΟΚΥΠΤΕΙ ΑΠΟ ΤΗΝ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΓΗ ΜΙΑΣ \"ΔΕΣΜΗΣ ΕΝΔΕΙΞΕΩΝ\" ΠΟΥ ΑΝΑΓΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΗ, ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΗ ΚΑΙ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ RATIO ΤΩΝ ΣΧΕΤΙΚΩΝ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΩΝ, ΚΑΘ'ΥΠΕΡΒΑΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΚΛΑΣΙΚΗΣ ΔΙΑΚΡΙΣΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΩΝ. ΣΤΙΣ ΤΡΕΙΣ ΧΩΡΕΣ ΠΟΥ ΑΠΟΤΕΛΟΥΝ ΑΝΤΙΚΕΙΜΕΝΟ ΣΥΓΚΡΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΜΕΛΕΤΗΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ(ΕΛΛΑΔΑ, ΓΑΛΛΙΑ, Ο.Δ.Γ.) ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΥ ΕΙΝΑΙ Ο ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΥ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΚΟΙΝΟΒΟΥΛΙΟ ΚΑΙ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΝ ΑΡΧΗΓΟ ΤΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ. Ο ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΑΣΚΕΙΤΑΙ ΗΤΙ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΡΟΠΟ ΛΑΝΘΑΝΟΝΤΑ (ΤΕΚΜΗΡΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΩΝ ΝΟΜΩΝ), ΕΙΤΕ ΜΕ ΤΙΣ ΓΕΝΙΚΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ ΠΑΡΑΓΩΓΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΥ (ΣΗΜΕΙΩΝΕΤΑΙ ΙΔΙΑΙΤΕΡΑ Ο ΡΟΛΟΣ ΕΝΟΣ ΔΕΥΤΕΡΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΘΕΤΙΚΟΥΣΩΜΑΤΟΣ 'Η ΜΙΑΣ ΔΕΥΤΕΡΗΣ ΒΟΥΛΗΣ ΚΑΘΩΣ ΚΑΙ Ο ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΝ ΑΡΧΗΓΟ ΤΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣΚΑΤΑ ΤΗΝ ΕΚΔΟΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΥ), ΕΙΤΕ ΜΕ ΕΙΔΙΚΕΣ ΤΥΠΟΠΟΙΗΜΕΝΕΣ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΕΣ (ΕΚΤΑΣΗ ΑΝΤΙΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΕΝΣΤΑΣΕΙΣ ΑΠΑΡΑΔΕΚΤΟΥ ΣΤΗ ΒΟΥΛΗ, ΑΡΜΟΔΙΟΤΗΤΑ ΑΝΑΠΟΜΠΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΥ ΣΤΗ ΒΟΥΛΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟΝ ΑΡΧΗΓΟ ΤΟΥ ΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ). (ΠΕΡΙΚΟΠΗ)"],"dc:identifier":["10.12681/eadd/1180","http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/1180"],"dc:language":["gre"],"dc:publisher":["Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki (AUTH)","Αριστοτέλειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλονίκης (ΑΠΘ)"],"dc:subject":["ΑΝΑΠΟΜΠΗ ΝΟΜΟΣΧΕΔΙΟΥ Η ΠΡΟΤΑΣΗΣ ΝΟΜΟΥ ΣΤΗ ΒΟΥΛΗ","ΑΡΝΗΣΗ ΕΚΔΟΣΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΝΟΜΩΝ","ΕΝΣΤΑΣΗ ΑΝΤΙΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΣΤΗ ΒΟΥΛΗ","ΕΝΣΤΑΣΗ ΑΠΑΡΑΔΕΚΤΟΥ ΣΤΗ ΒΟΥΛΗ","CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF LAWS BY THE PARLIAMENT","Κοινωνικές Επιστήμες","Νομική Επιστήμη","Social Sciences","Law"],"dc:title":["Ο ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΟΥ ΝΟΜΟΥ. ΜΕΛΕΤΗ ΣΥΓΚΡΙΤΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟΥ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΟ ΔΙΚΑΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ, ΤΗΣ ΓΑΛΛΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΟΜΟΣΠΟΝΔΙΑΚΗΣ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΓΕΡΜΑΝΙΑΣ","THE POLITICAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE LAW. A STUDY OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF GREECE, FRANCE AND THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY"],"dc:type":["PhD Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:24:46Z"}