{"id":{"repo_id":"greece","oai_identifier":"oai:10442/1096"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/greece/oai:10442/1096","repository":{"repo_id":"greece","name":"Greek National Archive of PhD Theses","base_url":"https://phdtheses.ekt.gr/eadd_oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Η ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΟΛΟΓΙΚΗ ΠΡΟΣΕΓΓΙΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΜΕΤΑΠΟΛΕΜΙΚΑ (1974-79)","abstract":"THE POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT ACCORDING TO ITS BASIC HYPOTHESIS IS DEPENDING ON SOME PREREQUISITES WHICH ARE FOUND ON SOCIOECONOMIC (SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT), HISTORICAL-POLITICAL AND SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL LEVEL. IN THE CASE OF GREECE IN POSTWAR PERIOD THESE PREREQUISITES THERE WEREN'T ON THERE WERE BUT IN A DEGREE NO SUFFICIENT. THE INCREASE OF ECONOMIC MAGNITUDES DIDN'T MEAN INDEPENDENT ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT BASED ON CONSTANT AND RIGHT BASES. THE DEVELOPMENT WAS DEPENDED ONFOREIGN CAPITAL AND WASN'T APPLICATED TO THE REAL NECESSITIES OF THE COUNTRY. EVEN IT WAS CHARACTERIZED BY LACK OF COORDINATION BETWEEN THE THREE SECTIONS OFPRODUCTION. IN FEW WORDS IT WAS A FALSE MODERNIZATION WHICH WAS MISLEADING THEMASSES OF THE PEOPLE SO THE POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT ACCORDING THE CRITERION WE DEFINED IN OUR INTRODUCTION (RATIONALIZATION, SPECIAL POLITICAL PARTICIPATION, SECULARIZATION, EXTRACTIVE ABILITY, RESPONSIVE ABILITY, CONTROL ABILITY, POLITICAL INTEGRATION AND STABILITY) HAS A LOW DEGREE. IN THE RESEARCH FOR THE DEGREE OF POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT I USED THE SYSTEM'S METHOD AND THE STRUCTURAL-FUNCTIONAL METHOD. BASED ON THE TWO LAST MONTHS I FOUND THAT THE TOP OF THE INCAPASITY OF THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF THE COUNTRY WAS THAT IT COULDN'T RESPONSE WITH CONCRETE \"OUTPUTS\" TO THE BASIC HISTORICAL SOCIAL DEMAND OF SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT WHICHWAS THE REALIZATION OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY AND THE GRADUAL SOCIALIZATION OF THE STRATEGIC SECTIONS OF THE ECONOMY. SUCH A THING OCCURED BECAUSE THEPOLITICAL SYSTEM WAS BLOCKED BY THE PREDOMINANT URBAN CLASS (BURGOIS) AND ITS FOREIGN PATRONS-MAILY THE AMERICANS.","abstract_html":"THE POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT ACCORDING TO ITS BASIC HYPOTHESIS IS DEPENDING ON SOME PREREQUISITES WHICH ARE FOUND ON SOCIOECONOMIC (SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT), HISTORICAL-POLITICAL AND SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL LEVEL. IN THE CASE OF GREECE IN POSTWAR PERIOD THESE PREREQUISITES THERE WEREN'T ON THERE WERE BUT IN A DEGREE NO SUFFICIENT. THE INCREASE OF ECONOMIC MAGNITUDES DIDN'T MEAN INDEPENDENT ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT BASED ON CONSTANT AND RIGHT BASES. THE DEVELOPMENT WAS DEPENDED ONFOREIGN CAPITAL AND WASN'T APPLICATED TO THE REAL NECESSITIES OF THE COUNTRY. EVEN IT WAS CHARACTERIZED BY LACK OF COORDINATION BETWEEN THE THREE SECTIONS OFPRODUCTION. IN FEW WORDS IT WAS A FALSE MODERNIZATION WHICH WAS MISLEADING THEMASSES OF THE PEOPLE SO THE POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT ACCORDING THE CRITERION WE DEFINED IN OUR INTRODUCTION (RATIONALIZATION, SPECIAL POLITICAL PARTICIPATION, SECULARIZATION, EXTRACTIVE ABILITY, RESPONSIVE ABILITY, CONTROL ABILITY, POLITICAL INTEGRATION AND STABILITY) HAS A LOW DEGREE. IN THE RESEARCH FOR THE DEGREE OF POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT I USED THE SYSTEM'S METHOD AND THE STRUCTURAL-FUNCTIONAL METHOD. BASED ON THE TWO LAST MONTHS I FOUND THAT THE TOP OF THE INCAPASITY OF THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF THE COUNTRY WAS THAT IT COULDN'T RESPONSE WITH CONCRETE "OUTPUTS" TO THE BASIC HISTORICAL SOCIAL DEMAND OF SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT WHICHWAS THE REALIZATION OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY AND THE GRADUAL SOCIALIZATION OF THE STRATEGIC SECTIONS OF THE ECONOMY. SUCH A THING OCCURED BECAUSE THEPOLITICAL SYSTEM WAS BLOCKED BY THE PREDOMINANT URBAN CLASS (BURGOIS) AND ITS FOREIGN PATRONS-MAILY THE AMERICANS.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Νικολόπουλος, Φίλιππος"],"institution":"Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1988,"date_issued":"1988","date_published":"1988","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:24:43Z","subjects":["NEOMARXIST APPROACH","NO-PARLIAMENTARY POLITICAL POWER IN GREECE","PARLIAMENTARY PROCESS IN GREECE","POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT (BASIC HYPOTHESIS)","POSTWAR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN GREECE","SYSTEM'S-STRUCTURAL-FUNCTIONAL METHOD","THE PREREQUISITES OF POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT","ΚΟΙΝΟΒΟΥΛΕΥΤΙΚΗ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ","ΜΕΤΑΠΟΛΕΜΙΚΗ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ","ΝΕΟΜΑΡΞΙΣΤΙΚΗ ΠΡΟΣΕΓΓΙΣΗ","ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ (ΒΑΣΙΚΗ ΥΠΟΘΕΣΗ)","ΠΡΟΑΠΑΙΤΟΥΜΕΝΑ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗΣ","ΣΥΣΤΗΜΙΚΗ-ΔΟΜΟΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΚΗ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΣ","Κοινωνικές Επιστήμες","Κοινωνιολογία","Social Sciences","Sociology"],"languages":["gre"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["10.12681/eadd/1096"],"render_values":[{"text":"10.12681/eadd/1096","href":"https://doi.org/10.12681/eadd/1096","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/1096","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Νικολόπουλος, Φίλιππος"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["1988"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences","Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Κοινωνικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["PhD Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["NEOMARXIST APPROACH","NO-PARLIAMENTARY POLITICAL POWER IN GREECE","PARLIAMENTARY PROCESS IN GREECE","POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT (BASIC HYPOTHESIS)","POSTWAR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN GREECE","SYSTEM'S-STRUCTURAL-FUNCTIONAL METHOD","THE PREREQUISITES OF POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT","ΚΟΙΝΟΒΟΥΛΕΥΤΙΚΗ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ","ΜΕΤΑΠΟΛΕΜΙΚΗ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ","ΝΕΟΜΑΡΞΙΣΤΙΚΗ ΠΡΟΣΕΓΓΙΣΗ","ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ (ΒΑΣΙΚΗ ΥΠΟΘΕΣΗ)","ΠΡΟΑΠΑΙΤΟΥΜΕΝΑ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗΣ","ΣΥΣΤΗΜΙΚΗ-ΔΟΜΟΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΚΗ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΣ","Κοινωνικές Επιστήμες","Κοινωνιολογία","Social Sciences","Sociology"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["gre"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["10.12681/eadd/1096","http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/1096"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["THE POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT ACCORDING TO ITS BASIC HYPOTHESIS IS DEPENDING ON SOME PREREQUISITES WHICH ARE FOUND ON SOCIOECONOMIC (SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT), HISTORICAL-POLITICAL AND SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL LEVEL. IN THE CASE OF GREECE IN POSTWAR PERIOD THESE PREREQUISITES THERE WEREN'T ON THERE WERE BUT IN A DEGREE NO SUFFICIENT. THE INCREASE OF ECONOMIC MAGNITUDES DIDN'T MEAN INDEPENDENT ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT BASED ON CONSTANT AND RIGHT BASES. THE DEVELOPMENT WAS DEPENDED ONFOREIGN CAPITAL AND WASN'T APPLICATED TO THE REAL NECESSITIES OF THE COUNTRY. EVEN IT WAS CHARACTERIZED BY LACK OF COORDINATION BETWEEN THE THREE SECTIONS OFPRODUCTION. IN FEW WORDS IT WAS A FALSE MODERNIZATION WHICH WAS MISLEADING THEMASSES OF THE PEOPLE SO THE POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT ACCORDING THE CRITERION WE DEFINED IN OUR INTRODUCTION (RATIONALIZATION, SPECIAL POLITICAL PARTICIPATION, SECULARIZATION, EXTRACTIVE ABILITY, RESPONSIVE ABILITY, CONTROL ABILITY, POLITICAL INTEGRATION AND STABILITY) HAS A LOW DEGREE. IN THE RESEARCH FOR THE DEGREE OF POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT I USED THE SYSTEM'S METHOD AND THE STRUCTURAL-FUNCTIONAL METHOD. BASED ON THE TWO LAST MONTHS I FOUND THAT THE TOP OF THE INCAPASITY OF THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF THE COUNTRY WAS THAT IT COULDN'T RESPONSE WITH CONCRETE \"OUTPUTS\" TO THE BASIC HISTORICAL SOCIAL DEMAND OF SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT WHICHWAS THE REALIZATION OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY AND THE GRADUAL SOCIALIZATION OF THE STRATEGIC SECTIONS OF THE ECONOMY. SUCH A THING OCCURED BECAUSE THEPOLITICAL SYSTEM WAS BLOCKED BY THE PREDOMINANT URBAN CLASS (BURGOIS) AND ITS FOREIGN PATRONS-MAILY THE AMERICANS.","ΣΥΜΦΩΝΑ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΒΑΣΙΚΗ ΥΠΟΘΕΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗΣ Η ΤΕΛΕΥΤΑΙΑ ΕΞΑΡΤΑΤΑΙ ΑΠΟΜΙΑ ΣΕΙΡΑ ΠΡΟΑΠΑΙΤΟΥΜΕΝΑ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΟΥ (ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ) ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΟΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΟΨΥΧΟΛΟΓΙΚΟΥ ΕΠΙΠΕΔΟΥ. ΣΤΗΝ ΠΕΡΙΠΤΩΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΗΝ ΜΕΤΑΠΟΛΕΜΙΚΗ ΠΕΡΙΟΔΟ ΔΙΑΠΙΣΤΩΝΕΤΑΙ ΟΤΙ ΑΥΤΑ ΤΑ ΠΡΟΑΠΑΙΤΟΥΜΕΝΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΝΥΠΑΡΚΤΑ 'Η ΕΥΡΙΣΚΟΝΤΑΙ ΣΕ ΒΑΘΜΟ ΑΝΕΠΑΡΚΕΙΑΣ. Η ΑΥΞΗΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΩΝ ΜΕΓΕΘΩΝ ΔΕΝ ΣΗΜΑΙΝΕ ΑΥΤΟΔΥΝΑΜΗ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΕΡΕΗ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ ΤΗΣ ΧΩΡΑΣ. Η ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ ΗΤΑΝ ΕΞΑΡΤΩΜΕΝΗ ΑΠ'ΤΟ ΞΕΝΟ ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟ ΚΑΙ ΔΕΝ ΗΤΑΝ ΠΡΟΣΑΡΜΟΣΜΕΝΗ ΣΤΙΣ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΕΣ ΑΝΑΓΚΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΧΩΡΑΣ. ΧΑΡΑΚΤΗΡΙΖΟΤΑΝ ΑΚΟΜΗ ΑΠΟ ΑΠΟΔΙΑΡΘΡΩΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΤΟΜΕΩΝ ΠΑΡΑΓΩΓΗΣ. ΕΠΡΟΚΕΙΤΟ ΔΗΛ. ΓΙΑ ΕΝΑ ΨΕΥΤΟΕΚΣΥΓΧΡΟΝΙΣΜΟ ΠΟΥ ΑΠΟΠΡΟΣΑΝΤΟΛΙΖΕΙ ΤΙΣ ΛΑΙΚΕΣ ΜΑΖΕΣ. ΕΤΣΙ Η ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ ΜΕ ΒΑΣΗ ΤΑ ΚΡΙΤΗΡΙΑ ΠΟΥ ΠΡΟΤΑΞΑΜΕ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗ ΜΑΣ (ΟΡΘΟΛΟΓΙΣΜΟΣ, ΕΞΕΙΔΙΚΕΥΣΗ, ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΣΥΜΜΕΤΟΧΗ, ΚΟΣΜΙΚΟΠΟΝΗΣΗ, ΙΚΑΝΟΤΗΤΑ ΕΚΜΕΤΑΛΛΕΥΣΗΣ ΠΕΡΙΒΑΛΛΟΝΤΟΣ, ΔΥΝΑΤΟΤΗΤΑ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΑΝΤΑΠΟΚΡΙΤΙΚΗ ΙΚΑΝΟΤΗΤΑ, ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΟΛΟΚΛΗΡΩΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΣΤΑΘΕΡΟΤΗΤΑ) ΔΙΑΠΙΣΤΩΝΕΤΑΙ ΟΤΙ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΧΑΜΗΛΟΥ ΒΑΘΜΟΥ. ΣΤΗΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΥΨΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΔΕΙΚΤΗ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗΣ ΧΡΗΣΙΜΟΠΟΙΗΘΗΚΕ Η ΣΥΣΤΗΜΙΚΗ-ΔΙΜΟΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΚΗ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΣ. ΜΕ ΒΑΣΗ ΤΗΝ ΤΕΛΕΥΤΑΙΑ ΜΕΘΟΔΟ, ΔΙΑΠΙΣΤΩΘΗΚΕ ΟΤΙ Η ΚΟΡΥΦΩΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΙΚΑΝΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΟΥ Π.Σ, ΤΗΣ ΧΩΡΑΣ, ΗΤΑΝ ΟΤΙ ΔΕΝ ΜΠΟΡΟΥΣΕ Ν'ΑΝΤΑΠΟΚΡΙΘΕΙ ΜΕ ΣΥΓΚΕΚΡΙΜΕΝΕΣ \"ΕΚΡΟΕΣ\" ΣΤΟ ΒΑΣΙΚΟ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΟΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟ ΑΙΤΗΜΑ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΥΠΕΡΙΒΑΛΛΟΝΤΟΣ ΠΟΥ ΗΤΑΝ Η ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗΣ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑΣ, ΚΑΙ Η ΠΡΟΟΔΕΥΤΙΚΗ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΣΤΡΑΤΗΓΙΚΩΝ ΤΟΜΕΩΝ ΤΗΣ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΑΣ. ΑΥΤΟ ΣΥΝΕΒΑΙΝΕ ΓΙΑΤΙ ΤΟ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑ ΗΤΑΝ \"ΜΠΛΟΚΑΡΙΣΜΕΝΟ\" ΑΠ'ΤΗΝ ΑΡΧΟΥΣΑ ΜΕΓΑΛΟΑΣΤΙΚΗ ΤΑΞΗ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΞΕΝΟΥΣ -ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΟΥΣ ΚΥΡΙΩΣ- ΠΡΟΣΤΑΤΕΣ ΤΟΥΣ."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Η ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΟΛΟΓΙΚΗ ΠΡΟΣΕΓΓΙΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΜΕΤΑΠΟΛΕΜΙΚΑ (1974-79)","THE SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH OF POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT IN GREECE IN THE POSTWAR PERIOD (1974-79)"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Νικολόπουλος, Φίλιππος"],"dc:date":["1988"],"dc:description":["THE POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT ACCORDING TO ITS BASIC HYPOTHESIS IS DEPENDING ON SOME PREREQUISITES WHICH ARE FOUND ON SOCIOECONOMIC (SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT), HISTORICAL-POLITICAL AND SOCIOPSYCHOLOGICAL LEVEL. IN THE CASE OF GREECE IN POSTWAR PERIOD THESE PREREQUISITES THERE WEREN'T ON THERE WERE BUT IN A DEGREE NO SUFFICIENT. THE INCREASE OF ECONOMIC MAGNITUDES DIDN'T MEAN INDEPENDENT ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT BASED ON CONSTANT AND RIGHT BASES. THE DEVELOPMENT WAS DEPENDED ONFOREIGN CAPITAL AND WASN'T APPLICATED TO THE REAL NECESSITIES OF THE COUNTRY. EVEN IT WAS CHARACTERIZED BY LACK OF COORDINATION BETWEEN THE THREE SECTIONS OFPRODUCTION. IN FEW WORDS IT WAS A FALSE MODERNIZATION WHICH WAS MISLEADING THEMASSES OF THE PEOPLE SO THE POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT ACCORDING THE CRITERION WE DEFINED IN OUR INTRODUCTION (RATIONALIZATION, SPECIAL POLITICAL PARTICIPATION, SECULARIZATION, EXTRACTIVE ABILITY, RESPONSIVE ABILITY, CONTROL ABILITY, POLITICAL INTEGRATION AND STABILITY) HAS A LOW DEGREE. IN THE RESEARCH FOR THE DEGREE OF POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT I USED THE SYSTEM'S METHOD AND THE STRUCTURAL-FUNCTIONAL METHOD. BASED ON THE TWO LAST MONTHS I FOUND THAT THE TOP OF THE INCAPASITY OF THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF THE COUNTRY WAS THAT IT COULDN'T RESPONSE WITH CONCRETE \"OUTPUTS\" TO THE BASIC HISTORICAL SOCIAL DEMAND OF SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT WHICHWAS THE REALIZATION OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY AND THE GRADUAL SOCIALIZATION OF THE STRATEGIC SECTIONS OF THE ECONOMY. SUCH A THING OCCURED BECAUSE THEPOLITICAL SYSTEM WAS BLOCKED BY THE PREDOMINANT URBAN CLASS (BURGOIS) AND ITS FOREIGN PATRONS-MAILY THE AMERICANS.","ΣΥΜΦΩΝΑ ΜΕ ΤΗΝ ΒΑΣΙΚΗ ΥΠΟΘΕΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗΣ Η ΤΕΛΕΥΤΑΙΑ ΕΞΑΡΤΑΤΑΙ ΑΠΟΜΙΑ ΣΕΙΡΑ ΠΡΟΑΠΑΙΤΟΥΜΕΝΑ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΟΥ (ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ) ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΟΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΟΨΥΧΟΛΟΓΙΚΟΥ ΕΠΙΠΕΔΟΥ. ΣΤΗΝ ΠΕΡΙΠΤΩΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΛΑΔΑΣ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΗΝ ΜΕΤΑΠΟΛΕΜΙΚΗ ΠΕΡΙΟΔΟ ΔΙΑΠΙΣΤΩΝΕΤΑΙ ΟΤΙ ΑΥΤΑ ΤΑ ΠΡΟΑΠΑΙΤΟΥΜΕΝΑ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΝΥΠΑΡΚΤΑ 'Η ΕΥΡΙΣΚΟΝΤΑΙ ΣΕ ΒΑΘΜΟ ΑΝΕΠΑΡΚΕΙΑΣ. Η ΑΥΞΗΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΩΝ ΜΕΓΕΘΩΝ ΔΕΝ ΣΗΜΑΙΝΕ ΑΥΤΟΔΥΝΑΜΗ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΕΡΕΗ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ ΤΗΣ ΧΩΡΑΣ. Η ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ ΗΤΑΝ ΕΞΑΡΤΩΜΕΝΗ ΑΠ'ΤΟ ΞΕΝΟ ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟ ΚΑΙ ΔΕΝ ΗΤΑΝ ΠΡΟΣΑΡΜΟΣΜΕΝΗ ΣΤΙΣ ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΕΣ ΑΝΑΓΚΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΧΩΡΑΣ. ΧΑΡΑΚΤΗΡΙΖΟΤΑΝ ΑΚΟΜΗ ΑΠΟ ΑΠΟΔΙΑΡΘΡΩΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΤΟΜΕΩΝ ΠΑΡΑΓΩΓΗΣ. ΕΠΡΟΚΕΙΤΟ ΔΗΛ. ΓΙΑ ΕΝΑ ΨΕΥΤΟΕΚΣΥΓΧΡΟΝΙΣΜΟ ΠΟΥ ΑΠΟΠΡΟΣΑΝΤΟΛΙΖΕΙ ΤΙΣ ΛΑΙΚΕΣ ΜΑΖΕΣ. ΕΤΣΙ Η ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ ΜΕ ΒΑΣΗ ΤΑ ΚΡΙΤΗΡΙΑ ΠΟΥ ΠΡΟΤΑΞΑΜΕ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗ ΜΑΣ (ΟΡΘΟΛΟΓΙΣΜΟΣ, ΕΞΕΙΔΙΚΕΥΣΗ, ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΣΥΜΜΕΤΟΧΗ, ΚΟΣΜΙΚΟΠΟΝΗΣΗ, ΙΚΑΝΟΤΗΤΑ ΕΚΜΕΤΑΛΛΕΥΣΗΣ ΠΕΡΙΒΑΛΛΟΝΤΟΣ, ΔΥΝΑΤΟΤΗΤΑ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΑΝΤΑΠΟΚΡΙΤΙΚΗ ΙΚΑΝΟΤΗΤΑ, ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΟΛΟΚΛΗΡΩΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΣΤΑΘΕΡΟΤΗΤΑ) ΔΙΑΠΙΣΤΩΝΕΤΑΙ ΟΤΙ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΧΑΜΗΛΟΥ ΒΑΘΜΟΥ. ΣΤΗΝ ΕΡΕΥΝΑ ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΥΨΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΔΕΙΚΤΗ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗΣ ΧΡΗΣΙΜΟΠΟΙΗΘΗΚΕ Η ΣΥΣΤΗΜΙΚΗ-ΔΙΜΟΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΚΗ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΣ. ΜΕ ΒΑΣΗ ΤΗΝ ΤΕΛΕΥΤΑΙΑ ΜΕΘΟΔΟ, ΔΙΑΠΙΣΤΩΘΗΚΕ ΟΤΙ Η ΚΟΡΥΦΩΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΙΚΑΝΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΤΟΥ Π.Σ, ΤΗΣ ΧΩΡΑΣ, ΗΤΑΝ ΟΤΙ ΔΕΝ ΜΠΟΡΟΥΣΕ Ν'ΑΝΤΑΠΟΚΡΙΘΕΙ ΜΕ ΣΥΓΚΕΚΡΙΜΕΝΕΣ \"ΕΚΡΟΕΣ\" ΣΤΟ ΒΑΣΙΚΟ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΚΟΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟ ΑΙΤΗΜΑ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΥΠΕΡΙΒΑΛΛΟΝΤΟΣ ΠΟΥ ΗΤΑΝ Η ΠΡΑΓΜΑΤΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗΣ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑΣ, ΚΑΙ Η ΠΡΟΟΔΕΥΤΙΚΗ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΣΤΡΑΤΗΓΙΚΩΝ ΤΟΜΕΩΝ ΤΗΣ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΑΣ. ΑΥΤΟ ΣΥΝΕΒΑΙΝΕ ΓΙΑΤΙ ΤΟ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑ ΗΤΑΝ \"ΜΠΛΟΚΑΡΙΣΜΕΝΟ\" ΑΠ'ΤΗΝ ΑΡΧΟΥΣΑ ΜΕΓΑΛΟΑΣΤΙΚΗ ΤΑΞΗ ΚΑΙ ΤΟΥΣ ΞΕΝΟΥΣ -ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΟΥΣ ΚΥΡΙΩΣ- ΠΡΟΣΤΑΤΕΣ ΤΟΥΣ."],"dc:identifier":["10.12681/eadd/1096","http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/1096"],"dc:language":["gre"],"dc:publisher":["Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences","Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Κοινωνικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών"],"dc:subject":["NEOMARXIST APPROACH","NO-PARLIAMENTARY POLITICAL POWER IN GREECE","PARLIAMENTARY PROCESS IN GREECE","POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT (BASIC HYPOTHESIS)","POSTWAR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN GREECE","SYSTEM'S-STRUCTURAL-FUNCTIONAL METHOD","THE PREREQUISITES OF POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT","ΚΟΙΝΟΒΟΥΛΕΥΤΙΚΗ ΔΙΑΔΙΚΑΣΙΑ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ","ΜΕΤΑΠΟΛΕΜΙΚΗ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ","ΝΕΟΜΑΡΞΙΣΤΙΚΗ ΠΡΟΣΕΓΓΙΣΗ","ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗ (ΒΑΣΙΚΗ ΥΠΟΘΕΣΗ)","ΠΡΟΑΠΑΙΤΟΥΜΕΝΑ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗΣ","ΣΥΣΤΗΜΙΚΗ-ΔΟΜΟΛΕΙΤΟΥΡΓΙΚΗ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΣ","Κοινωνικές Επιστήμες","Κοινωνιολογία","Social Sciences","Sociology"],"dc:title":["Η ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΟΛΟΓΙΚΗ ΠΡΟΣΕΓΓΙΣΗ ΤΗΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΑΝΑΠΤΥΞΗΣ ΣΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΑΔΑ ΜΕΤΑΠΟΛΕΜΙΚΑ (1974-79)","THE SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH OF POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT IN GREECE IN THE POSTWAR PERIOD (1974-79)"],"dc:type":["PhD Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:24:43Z"}