{"id":{"repo_id":"greece","oai_identifier":"oai:10442/0647"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/greece/oai:10442/0647","repository":{"repo_id":"greece","name":"Greek National Archive of PhD Theses","base_url":"https://phdtheses.ekt.gr/eadd_oai/request"},"display":{"title":"ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΑ ΣΥΣΤΑΣΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥ ΣΕ ΘΕΩΡΙΕΣ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΛΑΙΟΥ (THOMAS HOBBES-JOHN LOCKE)","abstract":"THE SUBJECT OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED DISSERTATION IS THE METHODICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF TWO MAJOR POLITICAL AND STATE THEORIES (THOMAS HOBBES-JOHN LOCKE) OF THE NASCENT BOURGEOIS SOCIETY DURING THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. THE PURPOSE OF THIS RECONSTRUCTION IS TO LOCATE THEIR PEMISES AS SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORIES, AS WELL ASTO ANALYZE PROBLEMS OF SOVERIEGNTY, THE FORMATION OF CONSENT WITHIN THE POLITICAL BODY AND THE RELATION BETWEEN POWERS. MOREOVER, THERE IS AN INTEREST TOWARDS THE CLARIFICATION THAT THE DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS OF THE STATE AND POLITICS WITHIN THOSE TWO MODELS CORRESPOND TO DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS OF THE VERY CHARACTEROF THE POLITICAL SCIENCE ITSELF . IN RELATION TO THIS, HOBBES' POLITICAL THEORY IS APPROACHED AS AN INDIVIDUALISTIC MODEL SETTING AS ITS STARTING-POINT THE SELFISH GOALS OF INDIVIDUAL AGENTS IN SOCIETY, WHILE LOCKE'S POLITICAL THEORY ISAPPROACHED AS A MODEL COMMITTED TO THE VALUES OF LIBERTY AND EQUALITY AS PREMISES FOR THE CONSTITUTION OF THE POLITICAL SYSTEM .","abstract_html":"THE SUBJECT OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED DISSERTATION IS THE METHODICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF TWO MAJOR POLITICAL AND STATE THEORIES (THOMAS HOBBES-JOHN LOCKE) OF THE NASCENT BOURGEOIS SOCIETY DURING THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. THE PURPOSE OF THIS RECONSTRUCTION IS TO LOCATE THEIR PEMISES AS SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORIES, AS WELL ASTO ANALYZE PROBLEMS OF SOVERIEGNTY, THE FORMATION OF CONSENT WITHIN THE POLITICAL BODY AND THE RELATION BETWEEN POWERS. MOREOVER, THERE IS AN INTEREST TOWARDS THE CLARIFICATION THAT THE DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS OF THE STATE AND POLITICS WITHIN THOSE TWO MODELS CORRESPOND TO DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS OF THE VERY CHARACTEROF THE POLITICAL SCIENCE ITSELF . IN RELATION TO THIS, HOBBES' POLITICAL THEORY IS APPROACHED AS AN INDIVIDUALISTIC MODEL SETTING AS ITS STARTING-POINT THE SELFISH GOALS OF INDIVIDUAL AGENTS IN SOCIETY, WHILE LOCKE'S POLITICAL THEORY ISAPPROACHED AS A MODEL COMMITTED TO THE VALUES OF LIBERTY AND EQUALITY AS PREMISES FOR THE CONSTITUTION OF THE POLITICAL SYSTEM .","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Αγγελίδης, Εμμανουήλ"],"institution":"Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Κοινωνικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1987,"date_issued":"1987","date_published":"1987","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:25:24Z","subjects":["Natural law","SOCIAL CONTRACT","T.HOBBES-J.LOCKE","ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟ ΣΥΜΒΟΛΑΙΟ","Φυσικό δίκαιο","Κοινωνικές Επιστήμες","Social Sciences","Πολιτικές Επιστήμες","Political Science"],"languages":["gre"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["10.12681/eadd/0647"],"render_values":[{"text":"10.12681/eadd/0647","href":"https://doi.org/10.12681/eadd/0647","code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/0647","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Αγγελίδης, Εμμανουήλ"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["1987"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Κοινωνικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών","Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["PhD Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Natural law","SOCIAL CONTRACT","T.HOBBES-J.LOCKE","ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟ ΣΥΜΒΟΛΑΙΟ","Φυσικό δίκαιο","Κοινωνικές Επιστήμες","Social Sciences","Πολιτικές Επιστήμες","Political Science"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["gre"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["10.12681/eadd/0647","http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/0647"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["THE SUBJECT OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED DISSERTATION IS THE METHODICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF TWO MAJOR POLITICAL AND STATE THEORIES (THOMAS HOBBES-JOHN LOCKE) OF THE NASCENT BOURGEOIS SOCIETY DURING THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. THE PURPOSE OF THIS RECONSTRUCTION IS TO LOCATE THEIR PEMISES AS SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORIES, AS WELL ASTO ANALYZE PROBLEMS OF SOVERIEGNTY, THE FORMATION OF CONSENT WITHIN THE POLITICAL BODY AND THE RELATION BETWEEN POWERS. MOREOVER, THERE IS AN INTEREST TOWARDS THE CLARIFICATION THAT THE DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS OF THE STATE AND POLITICS WITHIN THOSE TWO MODELS CORRESPOND TO DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS OF THE VERY CHARACTEROF THE POLITICAL SCIENCE ITSELF . IN RELATION TO THIS, HOBBES' POLITICAL THEORY IS APPROACHED AS AN INDIVIDUALISTIC MODEL SETTING AS ITS STARTING-POINT THE SELFISH GOALS OF INDIVIDUAL AGENTS IN SOCIETY, WHILE LOCKE'S POLITICAL THEORY ISAPPROACHED AS A MODEL COMMITTED TO THE VALUES OF LIBERTY AND EQUALITY AS PREMISES FOR THE CONSTITUTION OF THE POLITICAL SYSTEM .","ΑΝΤΙΚΕΙΜΕΝΟ ΤΗΣ ΔΙΔΑΚΤΟΡΙΚΗΣ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ Η ΜΕΘΟΔΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΚΑΤΑΣΚΕΥΗ ΔΥΟ ΣΗΜΑΝΤΙΚΩΝ ΘΕΩΡΙΩΝ (Τ.ΧΟΜΠΣ-ΤΖ.ΛΟΚ) ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΚΡΑΤΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΤΗΣ ΔΙΑΜΟΡΦΟΥΜΕΝΗΣ ΑΣΤΙΚΗΣ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΑΣ ΤΟΥ 17ΟΥ ΑΙΩΝΑ. Η ΑΝΑΚΑΤΑΣΚΕΥΗ ΑΠΟΣΚΟΠΕΙ ΣΤΟΝ ΕΝΤΟΠΙΣΜΟ ΤΩΝ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΟΛΟΓΙΚΩΝ ΠΡΟΥΠΟΘΕΣΕΩΝ ΤΟΥΣ ΩΣ ΘΕΩΡΙΩΝ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΛΑΙΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΑΝΑΛΥΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΩΝ ΣΥΓΚΡΟΤΗΣΗΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΚΥΡΙΑΡΧΙΑΣ, ΔΙΑΜΟΡΦΩΣΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΑΙΝΕΣΗΣ ΣΤΟ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟ ΣΩΜΑ ΚΑΙ ΣΧΕΣΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΕΞΟΥΣΙΩΝ. ΙΔΙΑΙΤΕΡΑ ΤΟ ΕΡΕΥΝΗΤΙΚΟ ΕΝΔΙΑΦΕΡΟΝ ΣΤΡΕΦΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΟ ΝΑ ΚΑΤΑΔΕΙΞΕΙ ΟΤΙ ΟΙ ΔΙΑΦΟΡΕΤΙΚΕΣ ΑΝΤΙΛΗΨΕΙΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΚΡΑΤΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΑΝΤΙΣΤΟΙΧΟΥΝ ΣΕ ΔΙΑΦΟΡΕΤΙΚΕΣ ΑΝΤΙΛΗΨΕΙΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΧΑΡΑΚΤΗΡΑ ΤΗΣ ΙΔΙΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΗΣ. ΣΕ ΣΧΕΣΗ ΜΕ ΑΥΤΟ, Η ΘΕΩΡΙΑ ΤΟΥ Τ.ΧΟΜΠΣ ΠΡΟΣΕΓΓΙΖΕΤΑΙ ΩΣ ΑΤΟΜΙΚΙΣΤΙΚΟ ΘΕΩΡΗΤΙΚΟ ΜΟΝΤΕΛΟ, ΠΟΥ ΘΕΤΕΙ ΩΣ ΑΦΕΤΗΡΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΤΙΣ ΕΓΩΙΣΤΙΚΕΣ ΣΚΟΠΟΘΕΣΙΕΣ ΤΩΝ ΔΡΩΝΤΩΝ ΣΕ ΣΧΕΣΗ ΜΕ ΤΙΣ ΟΠΟΙΕΣ ΣΥΓΚΡΟΤΕΙΤΑΙ Η ΡΥΘΜΙΣΗ, ΕΝΩ Η ΘΕΩΡΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΤΖ.ΛΟΚ ΠΡΟΣΕΓΓΙΖΕΤΑΙ ΩΣ ΑΞΙΟΛΟΓΙΚΟ ΘΕΩΡΗΤΙΚΟ ΜΟΝΤΕΛΟ, ΠΟΥ ΠΡΟΣΑΝΑΤΟΛΙΖΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΙΣ ΙΔΕΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΕΥΘΕΡΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΙΣΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΩΣ ΠΡΟΥΠΟΘΕΣΕΙΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΗ ΣΥΣΤΑΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥ."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΑ ΣΥΣΤΑΣΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥ ΣΕ ΘΕΩΡΙΕΣ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΛΑΙΟΥ (THOMAS HOBBES-JOHN LOCKE)","PROBLEMS ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE POLITICAL IN SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORIES (THOMAS HOBBES-JOHN LOCKE)"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Αγγελίδης, Εμμανουήλ"],"dc:date":["1987"],"dc:description":["THE SUBJECT OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED DISSERTATION IS THE METHODICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF TWO MAJOR POLITICAL AND STATE THEORIES (THOMAS HOBBES-JOHN LOCKE) OF THE NASCENT BOURGEOIS SOCIETY DURING THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. THE PURPOSE OF THIS RECONSTRUCTION IS TO LOCATE THEIR PEMISES AS SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORIES, AS WELL ASTO ANALYZE PROBLEMS OF SOVERIEGNTY, THE FORMATION OF CONSENT WITHIN THE POLITICAL BODY AND THE RELATION BETWEEN POWERS. MOREOVER, THERE IS AN INTEREST TOWARDS THE CLARIFICATION THAT THE DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS OF THE STATE AND POLITICS WITHIN THOSE TWO MODELS CORRESPOND TO DIFFERENT CONCEPTIONS OF THE VERY CHARACTEROF THE POLITICAL SCIENCE ITSELF . IN RELATION TO THIS, HOBBES' POLITICAL THEORY IS APPROACHED AS AN INDIVIDUALISTIC MODEL SETTING AS ITS STARTING-POINT THE SELFISH GOALS OF INDIVIDUAL AGENTS IN SOCIETY, WHILE LOCKE'S POLITICAL THEORY ISAPPROACHED AS A MODEL COMMITTED TO THE VALUES OF LIBERTY AND EQUALITY AS PREMISES FOR THE CONSTITUTION OF THE POLITICAL SYSTEM .","ΑΝΤΙΚΕΙΜΕΝΟ ΤΗΣ ΔΙΔΑΚΤΟΡΙΚΗΣ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ Η ΜΕΘΟΔΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΚΑΤΑΣΚΕΥΗ ΔΥΟ ΣΗΜΑΝΤΙΚΩΝ ΘΕΩΡΙΩΝ (Τ.ΧΟΜΠΣ-ΤΖ.ΛΟΚ) ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΚΡΑΤΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΤΗΣ ΔΙΑΜΟΡΦΟΥΜΕΝΗΣ ΑΣΤΙΚΗΣ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΑΣ ΤΟΥ 17ΟΥ ΑΙΩΝΑ. Η ΑΝΑΚΑΤΑΣΚΕΥΗ ΑΠΟΣΚΟΠΕΙ ΣΤΟΝ ΕΝΤΟΠΙΣΜΟ ΤΩΝ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΟΛΟΓΙΚΩΝ ΠΡΟΥΠΟΘΕΣΕΩΝ ΤΟΥΣ ΩΣ ΘΕΩΡΙΩΝ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΛΑΙΟΥ ΚΑΙ ΣΤΗΝ ΑΝΑΛΥΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΩΝ ΣΥΓΚΡΟΤΗΣΗΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΚΥΡΙΑΡΧΙΑΣ, ΔΙΑΜΟΡΦΩΣΗΣ ΤΗΣ ΣΥΝΑΙΝΕΣΗΣ ΣΤΟ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟ ΣΩΜΑ ΚΑΙ ΣΧΕΣΗΣ ΤΩΝ ΕΞΟΥΣΙΩΝ. ΙΔΙΑΙΤΕΡΑ ΤΟ ΕΡΕΥΝΗΤΙΚΟ ΕΝΔΙΑΦΕΡΟΝ ΣΤΡΕΦΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΟ ΝΑ ΚΑΤΑΔΕΙΞΕΙ ΟΤΙ ΟΙ ΔΙΑΦΟΡΕΤΙΚΕΣ ΑΝΤΙΛΗΨΕΙΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΚΡΑΤΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗ ΑΝΤΙΣΤΟΙΧΟΥΝ ΣΕ ΔΙΑΦΟΡΕΤΙΚΕΣ ΑΝΤΙΛΗΨΕΙΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΟ ΧΑΡΑΚΤΗΡΑ ΤΗΣ ΙΔΙΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΗΣ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΗΣ. ΣΕ ΣΧΕΣΗ ΜΕ ΑΥΤΟ, Η ΘΕΩΡΙΑ ΤΟΥ Τ.ΧΟΜΠΣ ΠΡΟΣΕΓΓΙΖΕΤΑΙ ΩΣ ΑΤΟΜΙΚΙΣΤΙΚΟ ΘΕΩΡΗΤΙΚΟ ΜΟΝΤΕΛΟ, ΠΟΥ ΘΕΤΕΙ ΩΣ ΑΦΕΤΗΡΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΤΙΣ ΕΓΩΙΣΤΙΚΕΣ ΣΚΟΠΟΘΕΣΙΕΣ ΤΩΝ ΔΡΩΝΤΩΝ ΣΕ ΣΧΕΣΗ ΜΕ ΤΙΣ ΟΠΟΙΕΣ ΣΥΓΚΡΟΤΕΙΤΑΙ Η ΡΥΘΜΙΣΗ, ΕΝΩ Η ΘΕΩΡΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΤΖ.ΛΟΚ ΠΡΟΣΕΓΓΙΖΕΤΑΙ ΩΣ ΑΞΙΟΛΟΓΙΚΟ ΘΕΩΡΗΤΙΚΟ ΜΟΝΤΕΛΟ, ΠΟΥ ΠΡΟΣΑΝΑΤΟΛΙΖΕΤΑΙ ΣΤΙΣ ΙΔΕΕΣ ΤΗΣ ΕΛΕΥΘΕΡΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ ΙΣΟΤΗΤΑΣ ΩΣ ΠΡΟΥΠΟΘΕΣΕΙΣ ΓΙΑ ΤΗ ΣΥΣΤΑΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥ."],"dc:identifier":["10.12681/eadd/0647","http://hdl.handle.net/10442/hedi/0647"],"dc:language":["gre"],"dc:publisher":["Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο Κοινωνικών και Πολιτικών Επιστημών","Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences"],"dc:subject":["Natural law","SOCIAL CONTRACT","T.HOBBES-J.LOCKE","ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟ ΣΥΜΒΟΛΑΙΟ","Φυσικό δίκαιο","Κοινωνικές Επιστήμες","Social Sciences","Πολιτικές Επιστήμες","Political Science"],"dc:title":["ΠΡΟΒΛΗΜΑΤΑ ΣΥΣΤΑΣΗΣ ΤΟΥ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΟΥ ΣΕ ΘΕΩΡΙΕΣ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΛΑΙΟΥ (THOMAS HOBBES-JOHN LOCKE)","PROBLEMS ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE POLITICAL IN SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORIES (THOMAS HOBBES-JOHN LOCKE)"],"dc:type":["PhD Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:25:24Z"}