{"id":{"repo_id":"glasgow","oai_identifier":"oai:theses.gla.ac.uk:1758"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/glasgow/oai:theses.gla.ac.uk:1758","repository":{"repo_id":"glasgow","name":"University of Glasgow","base_url":"https://theses.gla.ac.uk/cgi/oai2"},"display":{"title":"The scribal fingerprint: a graphetic analysis of MS Glasow University Library Hunter 83","abstract":"This thesis provides a graphetic analysis of the two hands active in MS Glasgow University Library Hunter 83, a Middle English edition of a Prose Brut text. It is based on the methodology first put forward by Professor McIntosh in 1974, which uses Graphetic and Linguistic Profiles in order to identify scribal idiosyncrasies. By applying the graphetic element of this theory to MS Hunter 83, the main body of this thesis presents two ‘scribal fingerprints’, ultimately singling out graphetic behaviour characteristic of both hands. The primary aim of this thesis is an in-depth analysis of the letter forms which will make up the body of the Graphetic Profiles of the two scribes. However, a further research question will be addressed: since the two scribes have been said in catalogues to write in “mixed” hands, is it possible to describe individual hands as “Secretary” or “Anglicana”, or is a more subtle typology, based on “fuzzy-set” theory, needed? By first establishing the characteristics of both scripts and secondly by comparing them to the two Graphetic Profiles, it is possible to establish the degree of ‘fuzziness’ relating to this established palaeographical terminology. Lastly, and perhaps most interestingly, it may be possible to identify a dialectal difference, since it is said that scribe B wrote in a ‘typical Scottish hand’ (Matheson 1998:205). A Graphetic Profile can shed further light on this assumption and identify the typical Scottish features allegedly present in the hand of this scribe. In sum, this thesis is an attempt to test the validity and value of McIntosh’s analytic procedure on two complex scribal outputs from the end of the Middle English period.","abstract_html":"This thesis provides a graphetic analysis of the two hands active in MS Glasgow University Library Hunter 83, a Middle English edition of a Prose Brut text. It is based on the methodology first put forward by Professor McIntosh in 1974, which uses Graphetic and Linguistic Profiles in order to identify scribal idiosyncrasies. By applying the graphetic element of this theory to MS Hunter 83, the main body of this thesis presents two ‘scribal fingerprints’, ultimately singling out graphetic behaviour characteristic of both hands. The primary aim of this thesis is an in-depth analysis of the letter forms which will make up the body of the Graphetic Profiles of the two scribes. However, a further research question will be addressed: since the two scribes have been said in catalogues to write in “mixed” hands, is it possible to describe individual hands as “Secretary” or “Anglicana”, or is a more subtle typology, based on “fuzzy-set” theory, needed? By first establishing the characteristics of both scripts and secondly by comparing them to the two Graphetic Profiles, it is possible to establish the degree of ‘fuzziness’ relating to this established palaeographical terminology. Lastly, and perhaps most interestingly, it may be possible to identify a dialectal difference, since it is said that scribe B wrote in a ‘typical Scottish hand’ (Matheson 1998:205). A Graphetic Profile can shed further light on this assumption and identify the typical Scottish features allegedly present in the hand of this scribe. In sum, this thesis is an attempt to test the validity and value of McIntosh’s analytic procedure on two complex scribal outputs from the end of the Middle English period.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Mol, Janneke Susanne"],"institution":"University of Glasgow","degree_name":null,"degree_level":"MPhil(R)","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010","date_published":"2010","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:24:05Z","subjects":["PE English","DA Great Britain","PR English literature"],"languages":["en"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":null,"outbound_label":null,"outbound_source":null},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Mol, Janneke Susanne"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2010"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2010"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Glasgow"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://theses.gla.ac.uk/1758/"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby URI","values":["https://gla.on.worldcat.org/oclc/665138626"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["MPhil(R)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["PE English","DA Great Britain","PR English literature"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://theses.gla.ac.uk/1758/1/2010molmphil.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis provides a graphetic analysis of the two hands active in MS Glasgow University Library Hunter 83, a Middle English edition of a Prose Brut text. It is based on the methodology first put forward by Professor McIntosh in 1974, which uses Graphetic and Linguistic Profiles in order to identify scribal idiosyncrasies. By applying the graphetic element of this theory to MS Hunter 83, the main body of this thesis presents two ‘scribal fingerprints’, ultimately singling out graphetic behaviour characteristic of both hands. The primary aim of this thesis is an in-depth analysis of the letter forms which will make up the body of the Graphetic Profiles of the two scribes. However, a further research question will be addressed: since the two scribes have been said in catalogues to write in “mixed” hands, is it possible to describe individual hands as “Secretary” or “Anglicana”, or is a more subtle typology, based on “fuzzy-set” theory, needed? By first establishing the characteristics of both scripts and secondly by comparing them to the two Graphetic Profiles, it is possible to establish the degree of ‘fuzziness’ relating to this established palaeographical terminology. Lastly, and perhaps most interestingly, it may be possible to identify a dialectal difference, since it is said that scribe B wrote in a ‘typical Scottish hand’ (Matheson 1998:205). A Graphetic Profile can shed further light on this assumption and identify the typical Scottish features allegedly present in the hand of this scribe. In sum, this thesis is an attempt to test the validity and value of McIntosh’s analytic procedure on two complex scribal outputs from the end of the Middle English period."]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The scribal fingerprint: a graphetic analysis of MS Glasow University Library Hunter 83"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Mol, Janneke Susanne"],"dc:date":["2010"],"dc:date.issued":["2010"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis provides a graphetic analysis of the two hands active in MS Glasgow University Library Hunter 83, a Middle English edition of a Prose Brut text. It is based on the methodology first put forward by Professor McIntosh in 1974, which uses Graphetic and Linguistic Profiles in order to identify scribal idiosyncrasies. By applying the graphetic element of this theory to MS Hunter 83, the main body of this thesis presents two ‘scribal fingerprints’, ultimately singling out graphetic behaviour characteristic of both hands. The primary aim of this thesis is an in-depth analysis of the letter forms which will make up the body of the Graphetic Profiles of the two scribes. However, a further research question will be addressed: since the two scribes have been said in catalogues to write in “mixed” hands, is it possible to describe individual hands as “Secretary” or “Anglicana”, or is a more subtle typology, based on “fuzzy-set” theory, needed? By first establishing the characteristics of both scripts and secondly by comparing them to the two Graphetic Profiles, it is possible to establish the degree of ‘fuzziness’ relating to this established palaeographical terminology. Lastly, and perhaps most interestingly, it may be possible to identify a dialectal difference, since it is said that scribe B wrote in a ‘typical Scottish hand’ (Matheson 1998:205). A Graphetic Profile can shed further light on this assumption and identify the typical Scottish features allegedly present in the hand of this scribe. In sum, this thesis is an attempt to test the validity and value of McIntosh’s analytic procedure on two complex scribal outputs from the end of the Middle English period."],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://theses.gla.ac.uk/1758/1/2010molmphil.pdf"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Glasgow"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://theses.gla.ac.uk/1758/"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby.uri":["https://gla.on.worldcat.org/oclc/665138626"],"dc:subject":["PE English","DA Great Britain","PR English literature"],"dc:title":["The scribal fingerprint: a graphetic analysis of MS Glasow University Library Hunter 83"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["MPhil(R)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:24:05Z"}