{"id":{"repo_id":"etsu","oai_identifier":"oai:dc.etsu.edu:etd-3182"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/etsu/oai:dc.etsu.edu:etd-3182","repository":{"repo_id":"etsu","name":"East Tennessee State University","base_url":"https://dc.etsu.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"A Quantitative Examination of School Configurations in Tennessee Using Sixth Grade Math, Reading, Science, and Social Studies Standardized Test Scores.","abstract":"<p>The purpose of this study was to determine if there were differences in standardized test scores, expressed as percentage passing, in math, reading-language arts, science, and social studies by comparing 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in K-8 schools with those in 6-8 schools. The data were gathered from an analysis of 6<sup>th</sup> grade student' scores on the 2006-2007 TCAP standardized assessment test in the state of Tennessee. The relationship between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the below proficient, proficient, or advanced level in each subject area was examined.</p><p>The analysis was based on 5 research questions. A t-test for independent samples was used to identify the relationships between the independent variables, configuration of the school (K-8 or 6-8), and the dependent variables, the percent of students scoring below proficient, proficient, or advanced. A chi square analysis was used to identify the relationship between the proportion of K-8 schools meeting AYP versus the proportion of 6-8 schools meeting AYP.</p><p>The study showed no relationship between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the below proficient level in math, reading-language arts, and social studies. Similarly, there was not a significant difference between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the proficient level in math and reading-language arts and the advanced level in math, reading-language arts, and science. However, there was a significant relationship between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the below proficient level and the proficient level in science and the percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the proficient level and advanced level in social studies. In science, a lower percentage of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in K-8 schools scored below proficient than did 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools. In science, a higher percentage of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in K-8 schools scored proficient than did 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools. In social studies, a higher percentage of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in K-8 schools scored proficient than did 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools. However, a higher percentage of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools scored advanced than did 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools. The study showed a significant difference in the proportion of K-8 schools meeting AYP versus the proportion of 6-8 schools meeting AYP.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;The purpose of this study was to determine if there were differences in standardized test scores, expressed as percentage passing, in math, reading-language arts, science, and social studies by comparing 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade students in K-8 schools with those in 6-8 schools. The data were gathered from an analysis of 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade student&#x27; scores on the 2006-2007 TCAP standardized assessment test in the state of Tennessee. The relationship between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade students scoring at the below proficient, proficient, or advanced level in each subject area was examined.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The analysis was based on 5 research questions. A t-test for independent samples was used to identify the relationships between the independent variables, configuration of the school (K-8 or 6-8), and the dependent variables, the percent of students scoring below proficient, proficient, or advanced. A chi square analysis was used to identify the relationship between the proportion of K-8 schools meeting AYP versus the proportion of 6-8 schools meeting AYP.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study showed no relationship between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade students scoring at the below proficient level in math, reading-language arts, and social studies. Similarly, there was not a significant difference between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade students scoring at the proficient level in math and reading-language arts and the advanced level in math, reading-language arts, and science. However, there was a significant relationship between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade students scoring at the below proficient level and the proficient level in science and the percent of 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade students scoring at the proficient level and advanced level in social studies. In science, a lower percentage of 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade students in K-8 schools scored below proficient than did 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade students in 6-8 schools. In science, a higher percentage of 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade students in K-8 schools scored proficient than did 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade students in 6-8 schools. In social studies, a higher percentage of 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade students in K-8 schools scored proficient than did 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade students in 6-8 schools. However, a higher percentage of 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade students in 6-8 schools scored advanced than did 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade students in 6-8 schools. The study showed a significant difference in the proportion of K-8 schools meeting AYP versus the proportion of 6-8 schools meeting AYP.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Ramsey, Whitney Jean"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"EdD (Doctor of Education)","degree_level":"Dissertation - unrestricted","degree_discipline":"Educational Leadership","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2009,"date_issued":"2009-05-09T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2009-05-09T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:21:03Z","subjects":["Grade Configurations","Academic Achievement","6th Grade Achievement","Education","Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research"],"languages":[],"rights":["Copyright by the authors."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1830","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Ramsey, Whitney Jean"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2009-05-09T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Educational Leadership"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation - unrestricted"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["EdD (Doctor of Education)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Grade Configurations","Academic Achievement","6th Grade Achievement","Education","Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright by the authors."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://dc.etsu.edu/context/etd/article/3182/viewcontent/RamseyW021209f.pdf","https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1830"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>The purpose of this study was to determine if there were differences in standardized test scores, expressed as percentage passing, in math, reading-language arts, science, and social studies by comparing 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in K-8 schools with those in 6-8 schools. The data were gathered from an analysis of 6<sup>th</sup> grade student' scores on the 2006-2007 TCAP standardized assessment test in the state of Tennessee. The relationship between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the below proficient, proficient, or advanced level in each subject area was examined.</p><p>The analysis was based on 5 research questions. A t-test for independent samples was used to identify the relationships between the independent variables, configuration of the school (K-8 or 6-8), and the dependent variables, the percent of students scoring below proficient, proficient, or advanced. A chi square analysis was used to identify the relationship between the proportion of K-8 schools meeting AYP versus the proportion of 6-8 schools meeting AYP.</p><p>The study showed no relationship between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the below proficient level in math, reading-language arts, and social studies. Similarly, there was not a significant difference between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the proficient level in math and reading-language arts and the advanced level in math, reading-language arts, and science. However, there was a significant relationship between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the below proficient level and the proficient level in science and the percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the proficient level and advanced level in social studies. In science, a lower percentage of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in K-8 schools scored below proficient than did 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools. In science, a higher percentage of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in K-8 schools scored proficient than did 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools. In social studies, a higher percentage of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in K-8 schools scored proficient than did 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools. However, a higher percentage of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools scored advanced than did 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools. The study showed a significant difference in the proportion of K-8 schools meeting AYP versus the proportion of 6-8 schools meeting AYP.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["A Quantitative Examination of School Configurations in Tennessee Using Sixth Grade Math, Reading, Science, and Social Studies Standardized Test Scores."]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Ramsey, Whitney Jean"],"dc:date.issued":["2009-05-09T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>The purpose of this study was to determine if there were differences in standardized test scores, expressed as percentage passing, in math, reading-language arts, science, and social studies by comparing 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in K-8 schools with those in 6-8 schools. The data were gathered from an analysis of 6<sup>th</sup> grade student' scores on the 2006-2007 TCAP standardized assessment test in the state of Tennessee. The relationship between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the below proficient, proficient, or advanced level in each subject area was examined.</p><p>The analysis was based on 5 research questions. A t-test for independent samples was used to identify the relationships between the independent variables, configuration of the school (K-8 or 6-8), and the dependent variables, the percent of students scoring below proficient, proficient, or advanced. A chi square analysis was used to identify the relationship between the proportion of K-8 schools meeting AYP versus the proportion of 6-8 schools meeting AYP.</p><p>The study showed no relationship between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the below proficient level in math, reading-language arts, and social studies. Similarly, there was not a significant difference between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the proficient level in math and reading-language arts and the advanced level in math, reading-language arts, and science. However, there was a significant relationship between grade configuration (6-8 or K-8) and percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the below proficient level and the proficient level in science and the percent of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students scoring at the proficient level and advanced level in social studies. In science, a lower percentage of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in K-8 schools scored below proficient than did 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools. In science, a higher percentage of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in K-8 schools scored proficient than did 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools. In social studies, a higher percentage of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in K-8 schools scored proficient than did 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools. However, a higher percentage of 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools scored advanced than did 6<sup>th</sup> grade students in 6-8 schools. The study showed a significant difference in the proportion of K-8 schools meeting AYP versus the proportion of 6-8 schools meeting AYP.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://dc.etsu.edu/context/etd/article/3182/viewcontent/RamseyW021209f.pdf","https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1830"],"dc:rights":["Copyright by the authors."],"dc:subject":["Grade Configurations","Academic Achievement","6th Grade Achievement","Education","Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research"],"dc:title":["A Quantitative Examination of School Configurations in Tennessee Using Sixth Grade Math, Reading, Science, and Social Studies Standardized Test Scores."],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Educational Leadership"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation - unrestricted"],"thesis:degree_name":["EdD (Doctor of Education)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:21:03Z"}