{"id":{"repo_id":"emich","oai_identifier":"oai:commons.emich.edu:theses-2521"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/emich/oai:commons.emich.edu:theses-2521","repository":{"repo_id":"emich","name":"Eastern Michigan University","base_url":"https://commons.emich.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Predictability of VO2max from three commercially available devices","abstract":"<p>The Polar V800TM, A300TM, and Garmin Forerunner 235TM predict VO2max from a submaximal effort. Purpose: To examine the predictability of VO2max from two heart rate monitors (Device A and V) and a global positioning system (GPS) watch compared to measured VO2max. Methods: Forty participants, 22 males and 18 females ages 18 to 55, came to the Running Science Laboratory at Eastern Michigan University. During visit 1, participants completed a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) to determine VO2max. At visit 2, each device’s protocol was followed to estimate VO2max. Pearson correlations, repeated measures ANOVA, and a paired samples t-test were utilized to compare estimated VO2max values from the devices to measured VO2max from the GXT (p < 0.05). Results: Ten participants were excluded. The GPS watch revealed a RMANOVA p-value < .001 for participants with > 50 ml/kg/min VO2max. Conclusion: Even though there were moderate to strong relationships, all three watches underestimated VO2max compared to measured VO2max.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;The Polar V800TM, A300TM, and Garmin Forerunner 235TM predict VO2max from a submaximal effort. Purpose: To examine the predictability of VO2max from two heart rate monitors (Device A and V) and a global positioning system (GPS) watch compared to measured VO2max. Methods: Forty participants, 22 males and 18 females ages 18 to 55, came to the Running Science Laboratory at Eastern Michigan University. During visit 1, participants completed a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) to determine VO2max. At visit 2, each device’s protocol was followed to estimate VO2max. Pearson correlations, repeated measures ANOVA, and a paired samples t-test were utilized to compare estimated VO2max values from the devices to measured VO2max from the GXT (p &lt; 0.05). Results: Ten participants were excluded. The GPS watch revealed a RMANOVA p-value &lt; .001 for participants with &gt; 50 ml/kg/min VO2max. Conclusion: Even though there were moderate to strong relationships, all three watches underestimated VO2max compared to measured VO2max.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["McCormick, Luke Daniel"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Master of Science (MS)","degree_level":"Open Access Thesis","degree_discipline":"Health Promotion and Human Performance","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Christopher W. Herman, Ph.D.","Jeff W. Schulz, Ph.D.","Shel Levine, M.S."],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2021,"date_issued":"2021-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2021-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:17:47Z","subjects":["Garmin","Polar","submaximal","VO2max","wearable technology","Kinesiology","Physiology"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://commons.emich.edu/theses/1124","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Christopher W. Herman, Ph.D.","Jeff W. Schulz, Ph.D.","Shel Levine, M.S."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["McCormick, Luke Daniel"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2022-06-13T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Health Promotion and Human Performance"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Open Access Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Science (MS)"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Garmin","Polar","submaximal","VO2max","wearable technology","Kinesiology","Physiology"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://commons.emich.edu/theses/1124"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>The Polar V800TM, A300TM, and Garmin Forerunner 235TM predict VO2max from a submaximal effort. Purpose: To examine the predictability of VO2max from two heart rate monitors (Device A and V) and a global positioning system (GPS) watch compared to measured VO2max. Methods: Forty participants, 22 males and 18 females ages 18 to 55, came to the Running Science Laboratory at Eastern Michigan University. During visit 1, participants completed a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) to determine VO2max. At visit 2, each device’s protocol was followed to estimate VO2max. Pearson correlations, repeated measures ANOVA, and a paired samples t-test were utilized to compare estimated VO2max values from the devices to measured VO2max from the GXT (p < 0.05). Results: Ten participants were excluded. The GPS watch revealed a RMANOVA p-value < .001 for participants with > 50 ml/kg/min VO2max. Conclusion: Even though there were moderate to strong relationships, all three watches underestimated VO2max compared to measured VO2max.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Predictability of VO2max from three commercially available devices"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Christopher W. Herman, Ph.D.","Jeff W. Schulz, Ph.D.","Shel Levine, M.S."],"dc:creator":["McCormick, Luke Daniel"],"dc:date.available":["2022-06-13T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>The Polar V800TM, A300TM, and Garmin Forerunner 235TM predict VO2max from a submaximal effort. Purpose: To examine the predictability of VO2max from two heart rate monitors (Device A and V) and a global positioning system (GPS) watch compared to measured VO2max. Methods: Forty participants, 22 males and 18 females ages 18 to 55, came to the Running Science Laboratory at Eastern Michigan University. During visit 1, participants completed a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) to determine VO2max. At visit 2, each device’s protocol was followed to estimate VO2max. Pearson correlations, repeated measures ANOVA, and a paired samples t-test were utilized to compare estimated VO2max values from the devices to measured VO2max from the GXT (p < 0.05). Results: Ten participants were excluded. The GPS watch revealed a RMANOVA p-value < .001 for participants with > 50 ml/kg/min VO2max. Conclusion: Even though there were moderate to strong relationships, all three watches underestimated VO2max compared to measured VO2max.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://commons.emich.edu/theses/1124"],"dc:subject":["Garmin","Polar","submaximal","VO2max","wearable technology","Kinesiology","Physiology"],"dc:title":["Predictability of VO2max from three commercially available devices"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Health Promotion and Human Performance"],"thesis:degree_level":["Open Access Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Science (MS)"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:17:47Z"}