Back to results

Eastern Kentucky University

First Responder Training Transfer: Does Training Delivery Method Matter?

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

<p>Technology-based training solutions are increasingly being utilized by organizations to achieve training objectives at lower costs as compared to traditional instructor-led training (ILT). This is especially true for the Nation’s first responder agencies that continue to face difficulties related to expanding training requirements that are pitted against limitations in agency financial and human resources. Despite the proliferation in the use of technology-based training solutions, such as web-based training (WBT), there is little research within the first responder community as to whether WBT is as effective as ILT in enabling trainees to transfer essential knowledge, skills, abilities (KSAs) from a training course to daily job settings. </p> <p>This study addressed this research gap through secondary data analysis of ILT and WBT courses developed by the Rural Domestic Preparedness Consortium (RDPC), a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) training provider, and subsequently delivered to first responders in rural communities across the United States. The secondary data analyzed within this study was originally obtained through the RDPC Level 3 Course Evaluation Program, which evaluates the training effectives of delivered courses. Although the RDPC program captures training transfer-related data for its courses, a comparative analysis of training delivery method has not been completed. Therefore, this analysis enabled the determination as to whether training transfer within the first responder community is affected by the training delivery method as well as other trainee characteristics (e.g., responder discipline and geographical region). Overall, the research findings suggest that training transfer is unaffected by training delivery method (ILT and WBT within this study) within the first responder community. </p> <p>The study results are important for first responder agencies in light of budget limitations, which tend to be exaggerated in small and rural areas. For example, the results illustrate that first responder agencies can utilize cost-effective WBT and experience no drop-off in training transfer. This finding provides justification to training providers, such as the RDPC, to invest in WBT course development and expanded delivery mechanisms to help provide training in more effective and efficient ways, which is important in small, rural, and remote communities. Lastly, this research provides valuable insight for both the first responder and academic communities by presenting information to help ensure the right trainee takes the right training at the right time for the right investment. </p>

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Doctor of Education (EdD)
Level thesis:degree_level
Doctoral's
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Educational Leadership and Policy Studies
Grantor dc:publisher
Eastern Kentucky University
Year
2015

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Simpkins, Brian Keith

Subjects

dc:subject × 8

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • Copyright 2015 Brian Keith Simpkins

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/425
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:encompass.eku.edu:etd-1423

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Eastern Kentucky University
Base URL
encompass.eku.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Simpkins, Brian Keith. First Responder Training Transfer: Does Training Delivery Method Matter?. Doctoral's thesis, Eastern Kentucky University, 2015. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/425