Back to results

Eastern Kentucky University

The relationship between coaching environment and athlete attributional style

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

<p>This study examined the relationship between attributional style and perceived coaching behaviors in collegiate cross-country/track and field athletes in the USA and Ireland. Participants included seventy-three collegiate athletes (Ireland: n = 24 male, n = 18 female, mean ± SD age: 20.39 ± 1.61 years. USA: n = 9 male, n = 22 female, mean ± SD age: 21.02 ± 2.18 years). Participants completed the Sport Attributional Style Scale (SASS; Hanrahan et al., 1989) and the Leadership Scale for Sport (LSS; Chelladurai & Selah, 1980) to assess attributional style and perceived coaching behaviors. Explanatory pessimism, total internality, stability, and globality were calculated from the SASS for both countries. Total dimension scores for five coaching behaviors (training/instruction, democratic, autocratic, social, and positive feedback) were calculated from the LSS. Significant differences were not found between countries for attribution dimensions (p > .05). Mean explanatory pessimism was 111.29 ±13.2 and 106.42 ± 10.7 for Ireland- and US-based athletes respectively (p = .948; p > .05). A significant difference was found for perceived democratic behavior between countries (p = .0006; p < .05). Significant positive correlations (p < .05) were found in the Ireland group for training/instruction and stability, and in the USA group for social and stability, and positive feedback and stability. Significant negative correlations (p < .05) were found in the Ireland group for democratic and internality, and autocratic and stability. Significant between-country differences (p < .05) were found for democratic and internality, autocratic and stability, and positive feedback and stability. Marginal between-country differences (p < .10) were seen for training/instruction and stability, training/instruction and globality, and autocratic and internality. Ireland-based athletes had higher perceptions of democratic behaviors than US-based athletes. There were no differences in attributional dimension scores between countries. Significant differences between countries for relationships between coaching behaviors and attribution dimensions existed. </p> <p>References: Chelladurai & Selah, 1980, Hanrahan et al., 1989 </p>

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Science (MS)
Level thesis:degree_level
Master's
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Exercise and Sport Science
Grantor dc:publisher
Eastern Kentucky University
Year
2015

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Britton, Una

Subjects

dc:subject × 6

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • Copyright 2015 Una Britton

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/243
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:encompass.eku.edu:etd-1241

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Eastern Kentucky University
Base URL
encompass.eku.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Britton, Una. The relationship between coaching environment and athlete attributional style. Master's thesis, Eastern Kentucky University, 2015. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/243