Back to results

Eastern Washington University

Origins of Roman art

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

<p>My introductory comments on the origins of Roman art deal briefly with the major cultural developments by which Roman art came into being. Primarily, how Etruscan traditions were the most dominant molding forces of Roman art, yet, the Etruscans were deeply indebted to the Greeks for initial inspirations. In order to illuminate some of these cultural-historical processes I used several comparisons to other cultures. Greek cultural influences were doubtlessly most instrumental in the shaping of Roman art for many cen-turies. Comparisons to Greek art are therefore a frequent recurrence throughout my thesis, because without Greek fundamentals, Roman art would not have attained the reputation as a most significant art movement of equal standing in the classical world. When searching for origins of Roman art, the estab-lished Etruscan traditions played a very important role. Hence, I devoted a short chapter on the Etruscan roots in Roman culture as well as a chapter on Etruscan art. These include wall painting, terracotta sculpture, and basic architecture, and how the Etruscan approach to Greek inspirations later became the same pattern followed by the Romans. The next two chapters deal with Roman cultural cha-racteristics that brought about their insatiable appetite for art. Systematic looting after successful military campaigns was not able to satisfy such greed. Needless to say, Greek art was most desirable. But new ways had to be found to fill Roman demands for art. Romans were not known as great inventors but rather as incredibly practical people. The use of art as propaganda, however, was mainly an original Roman application, especially in monumental architecture and portrait sculpture. Both media are described from a cultural point of view. I have chosen particularly suitable examples for this purpose as well as illustrations to provide for an even better understanding. In my final comments I want to be sure not to leave the impression that "Roman art" was really not Roman art. On the contrary, Virgil and other Roman scholars were well aware of their Roman characteristics and even admitted that their principle elements for social life which led to their successes were originally invented by the Greeks. The same was true with the pri[n]ciple elements of art. The Romans, however, were clever and skillful. They knew how to change basic concepts to fit their life-style and then use them in their favor. Does this approach to life not strike a familiar chord in all of us?</p>

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Arts (MA) in Interdisciplinary Studies
Level thesis:degree_level
Thesis: EWU Only
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Art
Year
1982

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Broecker, Walter Emil

Subjects

dc:subject × 2

Rights

dc:rights
Statement dc:rights
  • Access perpetually restricted to EWU users with an active EWU NetID

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://dc.ewu.edu/theses/809
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:dc.ewu.edu:theses-1810

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Eastern Washington University
Base URL
dc.ewu.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Broecker, Walter Emil. Origins of Roman art. Thesis: EWU Only thesis, 1982. https://dc.ewu.edu/theses/809