The findings suggest that the political process model is not sufficient in explaining the emergence and success of the ANLRM. The other theories discussed above were found to be involved in the emergence and success of the Alaskan Native Land Rights Movement, along with the political process model.","abstract_html":"The emergence and success of the Alaskan Native Land Rights Movement of the period between 1959 and 1971 is analyzed based on the political process model and other theories from the social movement theory perspective. Explanations outside of the political process model, including resource mobilization theory, ethnic competition theory, collective identity theory, and grievance theory were used to assess the applicability of the political process model in this case study. Interviews were used as well as historical literature and theoretical literature as a basis of analysis.</p><p> The findings suggest that the political process model is not sufficient in explaining the emergence and success of the ANLRM. The other theories discussed above were found to be involved in the emergence and success of the Alaskan Native Land Rights Movement, along with the political process model.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Liebner, Kristine Michelle"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"MA","degree_level":"Immediate Access","degree_discipline":"Graduate Center for Social and Public Policy","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Daniel Lieberfeld","Douglas Harper"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2006,"date_issued":"2006-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2006-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:10:02Z","subjects":["Alaska","American Indian","Collective Identity","Land Rights","Political Process Model"],"languages":["English"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/825","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Daniel Lieberfeld","Douglas Harper"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Liebner, Kristine Michelle"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-08-03T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Graduate Center for Social and Public Policy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Immediate Access"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["MA"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Alaska","American Indian","Collective Identity","Land Rights","Political Process Model"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/825"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The emergence and success of the Alaskan Native Land Rights Movement of the period between 1959 and 1971 is analyzed based on the political process model and other theories from the social movement theory perspective. Explanations outside of the political process model, including resource mobilization theory, ethnic competition theory, collective identity theory, and grievance theory were used to assess the applicability of the political process model in this case study. Interviews were used as well as historical literature and theoretical literature as a basis of analysis.
The findings suggest that the political process model is not sufficient in explaining the emergence and success of the ANLRM. The other theories discussed above were found to be involved in the emergence and success of the Alaskan Native Land Rights Movement, along with the political process model."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Political Process Model: A Case Study of the Alaskan Native Land Rights Movement, 1959-1971"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Daniel Lieberfeld","Douglas Harper"],"dc:creator":["Liebner, Kristine Michelle"],"dc:date.available":["2018-08-03T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["The emergence and success of the Alaskan Native Land Rights Movement of the period between 1959 and 1971 is analyzed based on the political process model and other theories from the social movement theory perspective. Explanations outside of the political process model, including resource mobilization theory, ethnic competition theory, collective identity theory, and grievance theory were used to assess the applicability of the political process model in this case study. Interviews were used as well as historical literature and theoretical literature as a basis of analysis.
The findings suggest that the political process model is not sufficient in explaining the emergence and success of the ANLRM. The other theories discussed above were found to be involved in the emergence and success of the Alaskan Native Land Rights Movement, along with the political process model."],"dc:identifier":["https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/825"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:subject":["Alaska","American Indian","Collective Identity","Land Rights","Political Process Model"],"dc:title":["The Political Process Model: A Case Study of the Alaskan Native Land Rights Movement, 1959-1971"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Graduate Center for Social and Public Policy"],"thesis:degree_level":["Immediate Access"],"thesis:degree_name":["MA"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:10:02Z"}