{"id":{"repo_id":"duquesne","oai_identifier":"oai:dsc.duq.edu:etd-1255"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/duquesne/oai:dsc.duq.edu:etd-1255","repository":{"repo_id":"duquesne","name":"Duquesne","base_url":"https://dsc.duq.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The Transformation of Kant's Transcendental Idealism: Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre","abstract":"This dissertation examines Fichte's original philosophical system, or the Wissenschaftslehre, against the background of Kant's transcendental idealism. Although his system is formulated within the context of the reconstruction of Kant's transcendental idealism, Fichte claims to posses the sole correct interpretation of Kant's view. He further asserts that he understands Kant better than Kant understands himself. This dissertation maintains that the issue of Fichte's relationship to Kant is a controversial one. It argues that Fichte's philosophical system is identical with and yet different from Kant's position. To the extent that Fichte rejects a representationalist solution to the problem of knowledge, this study contends that his system is true to the spirit of Kant's critical philosophy. However, to the extent that his method of presentation differs from Kant's, the dissertation argues that Fichte's view is his own, and should be evaluated on its own merit.","abstract_html":"This dissertation examines Fichte's original philosophical system, or the Wissenschaftslehre, against the background of Kant's transcendental idealism. Although his system is formulated within the context of the reconstruction of Kant's transcendental idealism, Fichte claims to posses the sole correct interpretation of Kant's view. He further asserts that he understands Kant better than Kant understands himself. This dissertation maintains that the issue of Fichte's relationship to Kant is a controversial one. It argues that Fichte's philosophical system is identical with and yet different from Kant's position. To the extent that Fichte rejects a representationalist solution to the problem of knowledge, this study contends that his system is true to the spirit of Kant's critical philosophy. However, to the extent that his method of presentation differs from Kant's, the dissertation argues that Fichte's view is his own, and should be evaluated on its own merit.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Agede, Kenneth Angwe"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"PhD","degree_level":"Immediate Access","degree_discipline":"Philosophy","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Tom Rockmore","Ronald Polansky","Daniel Selcer"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2009,"date_issued":"2009-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2009-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:09:20Z","subjects":["Circular justification","Epistemology","German Idealism","Monism","Self-referentiality","Wissenschaftslehre"],"languages":["English"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/251","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Tom Rockmore","Ronald Polansky","Daniel Selcer"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Agede, Kenneth Angwe"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-08-03T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Immediate Access"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["PhD"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Circular justification","Epistemology","German Idealism","Monism","Self-referentiality","Wissenschaftslehre"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/251"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This dissertation examines Fichte's original philosophical system, or the Wissenschaftslehre, against the background of Kant's transcendental idealism. Although his system is formulated within the context of the reconstruction of Kant's transcendental idealism, Fichte claims to posses the sole correct interpretation of Kant's view. He further asserts that he understands Kant better than Kant understands himself. This dissertation maintains that the issue of Fichte's relationship to Kant is a controversial one. It argues that Fichte's philosophical system is identical with and yet different from Kant's position. To the extent that Fichte rejects a representationalist solution to the problem of knowledge, this study contends that his system is true to the spirit of Kant's critical philosophy. However, to the extent that his method of presentation differs from Kant's, the dissertation argues that Fichte's view is his own, and should be evaluated on its own merit."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Transformation of Kant's Transcendental Idealism: Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Tom Rockmore","Ronald Polansky","Daniel Selcer"],"dc:creator":["Agede, Kenneth Angwe"],"dc:date.available":["2018-08-03T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This dissertation examines Fichte's original philosophical system, or the Wissenschaftslehre, against the background of Kant's transcendental idealism. Although his system is formulated within the context of the reconstruction of Kant's transcendental idealism, Fichte claims to posses the sole correct interpretation of Kant's view. He further asserts that he understands Kant better than Kant understands himself. This dissertation maintains that the issue of Fichte's relationship to Kant is a controversial one. It argues that Fichte's philosophical system is identical with and yet different from Kant's position. To the extent that Fichte rejects a representationalist solution to the problem of knowledge, this study contends that his system is true to the spirit of Kant's critical philosophy. However, to the extent that his method of presentation differs from Kant's, the dissertation argues that Fichte's view is his own, and should be evaluated on its own merit."],"dc:identifier":["https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/251"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:subject":["Circular justification","Epistemology","German Idealism","Monism","Self-referentiality","Wissenschaftslehre"],"dc:title":["The Transformation of Kant's Transcendental Idealism: Fichte's Wissenschaftslehre"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Philosophy"],"thesis:degree_level":["Immediate Access"],"thesis:degree_name":["PhD"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:09:20Z"}