The purpose of this investigation was to validate a newly constructed instrument, the Creativity Assessment for the Malleability of Possible Selves (CAMPS) and, through that process, operationally define the newly developed construct of self-creativity. This dissertation utilizes three separate studies to validate the CAMPS and operationally define self-creativity, including samples intended to represent the general population (n = 199), professional counselors (n = 133), and exemplars of self-creativity (n = 13). Study 1 utilized an exploratory factor analysis for the initial item reduction and factor structure exploration, followed by testing convergent and discriminant validity utilizing established assessments of creativity, personality, and depression. Through this process, 16 items and six factors emerged, as did the initial parameters for the self-creativity operational definition. Study 2 utilized a confirmatory factor analysis to confirm this 16-item, six factor model, the results of which supported a good model fit. Study 3 utilized semi-structured interviews with exemplars of self-creativity for the purpose of determining face validity of both the CAMPS and the conceptual definition of self-creativity, as well as to provide feedback on the overall experience of completing the assessment. Hypothetical and practical implications of these results and recommendations for future research are discussed.
","abstract_html":"<p>The purpose of this investigation was to validate a newly constructed instrument, the Creativity Assessment for the Malleability of Possible Selves (CAMPS) and, through that process, operationally define the newly developed construct of self-creativity. This dissertation utilizes three separate studies to validate the CAMPS and operationally define self-creativity, including samples intended to represent the general population (<em>n </em>= 199), professional counselors (<em>n</em> = 133), and exemplars of self-creativity (<em>n </em>= 13). Study 1 utilized an exploratory factor analysis for the initial item reduction and factor structure exploration, followed by testing convergent and discriminant validity utilizing established assessments of creativity, personality, and depression. Through this process, 16 items and six factors emerged, as did the initial parameters for the self-creativity operational definition. Study 2 utilized a confirmatory factor analysis to confirm this 16-item, six factor model, the results of which supported a good model fit. Study 3 utilized semi-structured interviews with exemplars of self-creativity for the purpose of determining face validity of both the CAMPS and the conceptual definition of self-creativity, as well as to provide feedback on the overall experience of completing the assessment. Hypothetical and practical implications of these results and recommendations for future research are discussed.<strong></strong></p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Varela, Alexandra Danae"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"PhD","degree_level":"One-year Embargo","degree_discipline":"Counselor Education and Supervision (ExCES)","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Matthew Bundick","Carol Parke","Jered Kolbert"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2017-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:09:13Z","subjects":["Creativity","Confirmatory Factory Analysis","Exploratory Factor Analysis","Mindset","Survey Validation","Possible Selves","Counselor Education"],"languages":["English"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/199","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Matthew Bundick","Carol Parke","Jered Kolbert"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Varela, Alexandra Danae"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-12-10T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Counselor Education and Supervision (ExCES)"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["One-year Embargo"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["PhD"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Creativity","Confirmatory Factory Analysis","Exploratory Factor Analysis","Mindset","Survey Validation","Possible Selves","Counselor Education"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/199"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The purpose of this investigation was to validate a newly constructed instrument, the Creativity Assessment for the Malleability of Possible Selves (CAMPS) and, through that process, operationally define the newly developed construct of self-creativity. This dissertation utilizes three separate studies to validate the CAMPS and operationally define self-creativity, including samples intended to represent the general population (n = 199), professional counselors (n = 133), and exemplars of self-creativity (n = 13). Study 1 utilized an exploratory factor analysis for the initial item reduction and factor structure exploration, followed by testing convergent and discriminant validity utilizing established assessments of creativity, personality, and depression. Through this process, 16 items and six factors emerged, as did the initial parameters for the self-creativity operational definition. Study 2 utilized a confirmatory factor analysis to confirm this 16-item, six factor model, the results of which supported a good model fit. Study 3 utilized semi-structured interviews with exemplars of self-creativity for the purpose of determining face validity of both the CAMPS and the conceptual definition of self-creativity, as well as to provide feedback on the overall experience of completing the assessment. Hypothetical and practical implications of these results and recommendations for future research are discussed.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Exploring the Concept of Self-Creativity Through the Validation of a New Survey Measure"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Matthew Bundick","Carol Parke","Jered Kolbert"],"dc:creator":["Varela, Alexandra Danae"],"dc:date.available":["2018-12-10T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["The purpose of this investigation was to validate a newly constructed instrument, the Creativity Assessment for the Malleability of Possible Selves (CAMPS) and, through that process, operationally define the newly developed construct of self-creativity. This dissertation utilizes three separate studies to validate the CAMPS and operationally define self-creativity, including samples intended to represent the general population (n = 199), professional counselors (n = 133), and exemplars of self-creativity (n = 13). Study 1 utilized an exploratory factor analysis for the initial item reduction and factor structure exploration, followed by testing convergent and discriminant validity utilizing established assessments of creativity, personality, and depression. Through this process, 16 items and six factors emerged, as did the initial parameters for the self-creativity operational definition. Study 2 utilized a confirmatory factor analysis to confirm this 16-item, six factor model, the results of which supported a good model fit. Study 3 utilized semi-structured interviews with exemplars of self-creativity for the purpose of determining face validity of both the CAMPS and the conceptual definition of self-creativity, as well as to provide feedback on the overall experience of completing the assessment. Hypothetical and practical implications of these results and recommendations for future research are discussed.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/199"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:subject":["Creativity","Confirmatory Factory Analysis","Exploratory Factor Analysis","Mindset","Survey Validation","Possible Selves","Counselor Education"],"dc:title":["Exploring the Concept of Self-Creativity Through the Validation of a New Survey Measure"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Counselor Education and Supervision (ExCES)"],"thesis:degree_level":["One-year Embargo"],"thesis:degree_name":["PhD"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:09:13Z"}