This cross-disciplinary dissertation provides a missing intellectual history of an ostensibly dead idea. Once widely held and no less elegant for its obsolescence, the principle of biogenetic recapitulation is best remembered by its defining mantra, “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny.” Among psychologists and sociologists as well as embryologists, the notion that the development of any individual organism repeats in compressed, miniaturized form the entire history of its species enjoyed broad (if not uncontested) acceptance through the early twentieth century. The author reexamines the origins of this theory in the work of Charles Darwin and Ernst Haeckel, and traces its influence in psychology from early psychoanalytic theory to late twentieth-century evolutionary neuroscience. It is argued that recapitulationism (or the “biogenetic law”) appealed to psychological theorists for its moral and affective implications, rather than its scientific merit or usefulness in generating testable hypotheses. Central to this study is an emphasis on the use of recapitulationism to critique doctrines of evolutionary and social progress. The dissertation concludes that for contemporary neuroscientists no less than early psychoanalysts, the ghost of phylogeny, or the evolutionary past, is most often summoned to explain worrisome and unexpected disruptions in normal human development—especially when those disruptions emerge within what is taken to be the height of modernity.
","abstract_html":"<p>This cross-disciplinary dissertation provides a missing intellectual history of an ostensibly dead idea. Once widely held and no less elegant for its obsolescence, the principle of biogenetic recapitulation is best remembered by its defining mantra, “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny.” Among psychologists and sociologists as well as embryologists, the notion that the development of any individual organism repeats in compressed, miniaturized form the entire history of its species enjoyed broad (if not uncontested) acceptance through the early twentieth century. The author reexamines the origins of this theory in the work of Charles Darwin and Ernst Haeckel, and traces its influence in psychology from early psychoanalytic theory to late twentieth-century evolutionary neuroscience. It is argued that recapitulationism (or the “biogenetic law”) appealed to psychological theorists for its moral and affective implications, rather than its scientific merit or usefulness in generating testable hypotheses. Central to this study is an emphasis on the use of recapitulationism to critique doctrines of evolutionary and social progress. The dissertation concludes that for contemporary neuroscientists no less than early psychoanalysts, the ghost of phylogeny, or the evolutionary past, is most often summoned to explain worrisome and unexpected disruptions in normal human development<strong><em>—</em></strong>especially when those disruptions emerge within what is taken to be the height of modernity.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Pittenger, Frank"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"PhD","degree_level":"One-year Embargo","degree_discipline":"Clinical Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Daniel Burston","Alexander Kranjec","Jeffrey McCurry"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2017-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:09:13Z","subjects":["recapitulation","evolution","ontogeny","phylogeny","metapsychology","psychoanalysis","recapitulationism","biogenetic law","death drive","triune brain","Comparative Psychology","History of Science, Technology, and Medicine","Philosophy of Science","Psychiatry and Psychology","Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy","Theory and Philosophy"],"languages":["English"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/192","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Daniel Burston","Alexander Kranjec","Jeffrey McCurry"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Pittenger, Frank"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2018-12-13T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Clinical Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["One-year Embargo"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["PhD"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["recapitulation","evolution","ontogeny","phylogeny","metapsychology","psychoanalysis","recapitulationism","biogenetic law","death drive","triune brain","Comparative Psychology","History of Science, Technology, and Medicine","Philosophy of Science","Psychiatry and Psychology","Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy","Theory and Philosophy"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/192"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This cross-disciplinary dissertation provides a missing intellectual history of an ostensibly dead idea. Once widely held and no less elegant for its obsolescence, the principle of biogenetic recapitulation is best remembered by its defining mantra, “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny.” Among psychologists and sociologists as well as embryologists, the notion that the development of any individual organism repeats in compressed, miniaturized form the entire history of its species enjoyed broad (if not uncontested) acceptance through the early twentieth century. The author reexamines the origins of this theory in the work of Charles Darwin and Ernst Haeckel, and traces its influence in psychology from early psychoanalytic theory to late twentieth-century evolutionary neuroscience. It is argued that recapitulationism (or the “biogenetic law”) appealed to psychological theorists for its moral and affective implications, rather than its scientific merit or usefulness in generating testable hypotheses. Central to this study is an emphasis on the use of recapitulationism to critique doctrines of evolutionary and social progress. The dissertation concludes that for contemporary neuroscientists no less than early psychoanalysts, the ghost of phylogeny, or the evolutionary past, is most often summoned to explain worrisome and unexpected disruptions in normal human development—especially when those disruptions emerge within what is taken to be the height of modernity.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Phylogeny, Psychology, and the Vicissitudes of Human Development: The Anxiety of Atavism"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Daniel Burston","Alexander Kranjec","Jeffrey McCurry"],"dc:creator":["Pittenger, Frank"],"dc:date.available":["2018-12-13T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This cross-disciplinary dissertation provides a missing intellectual history of an ostensibly dead idea. Once widely held and no less elegant for its obsolescence, the principle of biogenetic recapitulation is best remembered by its defining mantra, “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny.” Among psychologists and sociologists as well as embryologists, the notion that the development of any individual organism repeats in compressed, miniaturized form the entire history of its species enjoyed broad (if not uncontested) acceptance through the early twentieth century. The author reexamines the origins of this theory in the work of Charles Darwin and Ernst Haeckel, and traces its influence in psychology from early psychoanalytic theory to late twentieth-century evolutionary neuroscience. It is argued that recapitulationism (or the “biogenetic law”) appealed to psychological theorists for its moral and affective implications, rather than its scientific merit or usefulness in generating testable hypotheses. Central to this study is an emphasis on the use of recapitulationism to critique doctrines of evolutionary and social progress. The dissertation concludes that for contemporary neuroscientists no less than early psychoanalysts, the ghost of phylogeny, or the evolutionary past, is most often summoned to explain worrisome and unexpected disruptions in normal human development—especially when those disruptions emerge within what is taken to be the height of modernity.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/192"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:subject":["recapitulation","evolution","ontogeny","phylogeny","metapsychology","psychoanalysis","recapitulationism","biogenetic law","death drive","triune brain","Comparative Psychology","History of Science, Technology, and Medicine","Philosophy of Science","Psychiatry and Psychology","Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy","Theory and Philosophy"],"dc:title":["Phylogeny, Psychology, and the Vicissitudes of Human Development: The Anxiety of Atavism"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Clinical Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["One-year Embargo"],"thesis:degree_name":["PhD"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:09:13Z"}