{"id":{"repo_id":"dundee","oai_identifier":"oai:discovery.dundee.ac.uk:studenttheses/5b44ec36-0a0d-4b50-b00f-465248956908"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/dundee/oai:discovery.dundee.ac.uk:studenttheses/5b44ec36-0a0d-4b50-b00f-465248956908","repository":{"repo_id":"dundee","name":"University of Dundee","base_url":"https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/ws/oai"},"display":{"title":"How do independent midwives assess the progress of labour?","abstract":"Design: This was a small qualitative study using a grounded theory approach. A purposive sample of 6 of the 32 full time practicing independent midwives were interviewed using in-depth semi-structured interviews. The data was transcribed and analysed using the principles of grounded theory. Ethical approval for this study was secured and informed consent obtained from all participants.Summary of Categories: 3 main categories emerged from the data: The first was ‘knowing’, comprising different types of knowledge the midwives used to make decisions. The second physical, signs included various signs displayed by the woman during labour and the third was knowledge of the ‘woman in labour’. This last category was based on the relationship that the woman and the midwife had developed during the antenatal period and through labour.Key Findings: In the absence of prescribed protocols for assessing the progress of labour, midwives develop a rich store of skills and knowledge that assist them in assessing the progress of labour. The foundation of this is the relationship of the midwife with the woman in her care. A model was developed to demonstrate how these three themes are closely entwined.","abstract_html":"Design: This was a small qualitative study using a grounded theory approach. A purposive sample of 6 of the 32 full time practicing independent midwives were interviewed using in-depth semi-structured interviews. The data was transcribed and analysed using the principles of grounded theory. Ethical approval for this study was secured and informed consent obtained from all participants.Summary of Categories: 3 main categories emerged from the data: The first was ‘knowing’, comprising different types of knowledge the midwives used to make decisions. The second physical, signs included various signs displayed by the woman during labour and the third was knowledge of the ‘woman in labour’. This last category was based on the relationship that the woman and the midwife had developed during the antenatal period and through labour.Key Findings: In the absence of prescribed protocols for assessing the progress of labour, midwives develop a rich store of skills and knowledge that assist them in assessing the progress of labour. The foundation of this is the relationship of the midwife with the woman in her care. A model was developed to demonstrate how these three themes are closely entwined.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Winter, Clare"],"institution":"University of Dundee","degree_name":"Master of Science","degree_level":"Master's Thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["McNabb, Mary","Henwood, Suzanne"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2002,"date_issued":"2002","date_published":"2002","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:07:31Z","subjects":["Assessing the progress of labour","Chaos theory","Independent midwives","Complexity","Grounded theory"],"languages":["eng"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oai:discovery.dundee.ac.uk:studenttheses/5b44ec36-0a0d-4b50-b00f-465248956908"],"render_values":[{"text":"oai:discovery.dundee.ac.uk:studenttheses/5b44ec36-0a0d-4b50-b00f-465248956908","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/5b44ec36-0a0d-4b50-b00f-465248956908","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["McNabb, Mary","Henwood, Suzanne"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Winter, Clare"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date","label":"Dc Date","values":["2002"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2002"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.department","label":"Dc Publisher Department","values":["School of Nursing & Midwifery"]},{"key":"dc:publisher.institution","label":"Dc Publisher Institution","values":["University of Dundee"]},{"key":"dc:relation.isreferencedby","label":"Dc Relation Isreferencedby","values":["https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/5b44ec36-0a0d-4b50-b00f-465248956908"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationlevel","label":"Dc Type Qualificationlevel","values":["Master's Thesis"]},{"key":"dc:type.qualificationname","label":"Dc Type Qualificationname","values":["Master of Science"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Assessing the progress of labour","Chaos theory","Independent midwives","Complexity","Grounded theory"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["eng"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["oai:discovery.dundee.ac.uk:studenttheses/5b44ec36-0a0d-4b50-b00f-465248956908","https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/5b44ec36-0a0d-4b50-b00f-465248956908"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/files/1292162/Winter_msc_2002.pdf"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Design: This was a small qualitative study using a grounded theory approach. A purposive sample of 6 of the 32 full time practicing independent midwives were interviewed using in-depth semi-structured interviews. The data was transcribed and analysed using the principles of grounded theory. Ethical approval for this study was secured and informed consent obtained from all participants.Summary of Categories: 3 main categories emerged from the data: The first was ‘knowing’, comprising different types of knowledge the midwives used to make decisions. The second physical, signs included various signs displayed by the woman during labour and the third was knowledge of the ‘woman in labour’. This last category was based on the relationship that the woman and the midwife had developed during the antenatal period and through labour.Key Findings: In the absence of prescribed protocols for assessing the progress of labour, midwives develop a rich store of skills and knowledge that assist them in assessing the progress of labour. The foundation of this is the relationship of the midwife with the woman in her care. A model was developed to demonstrate how these three themes are closely entwined."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["How do independent midwives assess the progress of labour?"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["McNabb, Mary","Henwood, Suzanne"],"dc:creator":["Winter, Clare"],"dc:date":["2002"],"dc:date.issued":["2002"],"dc:description.abstract":["Design: This was a small qualitative study using a grounded theory approach. A purposive sample of 6 of the 32 full time practicing independent midwives were interviewed using in-depth semi-structured interviews. The data was transcribed and analysed using the principles of grounded theory. Ethical approval for this study was secured and informed consent obtained from all participants.Summary of Categories: 3 main categories emerged from the data: The first was ‘knowing’, comprising different types of knowledge the midwives used to make decisions. The second physical, signs included various signs displayed by the woman during labour and the third was knowledge of the ‘woman in labour’. This last category was based on the relationship that the woman and the midwife had developed during the antenatal period and through labour.Key Findings: In the absence of prescribed protocols for assessing the progress of labour, midwives develop a rich store of skills and knowledge that assist them in assessing the progress of labour. The foundation of this is the relationship of the midwife with the woman in her care. A model was developed to demonstrate how these three themes are closely entwined."],"dc:identifier":["oai:discovery.dundee.ac.uk:studenttheses/5b44ec36-0a0d-4b50-b00f-465248956908","https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/5b44ec36-0a0d-4b50-b00f-465248956908"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/files/1292162/Winter_msc_2002.pdf"],"dc:language":["eng"],"dc:publisher.department":["School of Nursing & Midwifery"],"dc:publisher.institution":["University of Dundee"],"dc:relation.isreferencedby":["https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/5b44ec36-0a0d-4b50-b00f-465248956908"],"dc:subject":["Assessing the progress of labour","Chaos theory","Independent midwives","Complexity","Grounded theory"],"dc:title":["How do independent midwives assess the progress of labour?"],"dc:type":["Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationlevel":["Master's Thesis"],"dc:type.qualificationname":["Master of Science"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:07:31Z"}