{"id":{"repo_id":"duke","oai_identifier":"oai:dukespace.lib.duke.edu:10161/3088"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/duke/oai:dukespace.lib.duke.edu:10161/3088","repository":{"repo_id":"duke","name":"Duke University","base_url":"https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The cost of locomotion in North Atlantic right whales (<italic>Eubalaena glacialis</italic>)","abstract":"<p>Locomotion in any environment requires the use of energy to overcome the physical</p><p>forces inherent in the environment. Most large marine vertebrates have evolved</p><p>streamlined fusiform body shapes to minimize the resistive force of drag when in</p><p>a neutral position, but nearly all behaviors result in some increase in that force.</p><p>Too much energy devoted to locomotion may reduce the available surplus necessary</p><p>for population-level factors such as reproduction. The population of North Atlantic</p><p>right whales has not recovered following legal protection due to decreased fecundity,</p><p>including an increase in the intercalf interval, an increase in the years to first calf and</p><p>an increase in the number of nulliparous females in the population. This reproductive</p><p>impairment appears to be related to deficiencies in storing enough energy to meet the</p><p>costs of reproduction. The goal of this study was to determine whether increases in</p><p>moving between prey patches at the cost of decreased foraging opportunities could</p><p>shift these whales into a situation of negative energy gain. The first step is to</p><p>understand the locomotor costs for this species for the key behaviors of traveling and</p><p>foraging.</p><p>This study investigated the cost of locomotion in right whales by recording the</p><p>submerged diving behaviors of free-ranging individuals in both their foraging habitat</p><p>in the Bay of Fundy and their calving grounds in the South Atlantic Bight with a</p><p>suction-cupped archival tag. The data from the tags were used to quantify the oc-</p><p>currence of different behaviors and their associated swimming behaviors and explore</p><p>three behavioral strategies that reduce locomotor costs. First, the influence that</p><p>changes in blubber thickness has on the buoyancy of these whales was investigated</p><p>by comparing the descent and ascent glide durations of individual whales with differ-</p><p>ent blubber thicknesses. Next, the depth of surface dives made by animals of different</p><p>sizes was related to the depth where additional wave drag is generated. Finally, the</p><p>use of intermittent locomotion during foraging was investigated to understand how</p><p>much energy is saved by using this gait. The final piece in this study was to deter-</p><p>mine the drag related to traveling and foraging behaviors from glides recorded by</p><p>the tags and from two different numerical simulations of flow around whales. One, a</p><p>custom developed algorithm for multiphase flow, was used to determine the relative</p><p>drag, while a second commercial package was used to determine the absolute mag-</p><p>nitude of the drag force on the simplest model, the traveling animal. The resulting</p><p>drag estimates were then used in a series of theoretical models that estimated the</p><p>energetic profit remaining after shifts in the occurrence of traveling and searching</p><p>behaviors.</p><p>The diving behavior of right whales can be classified into three stereotyped be-</p><p>haviors that are characterized by differences in the time spent in different parts of the</p><p>water column. The time budgets and swimming movements during these behaviors</p><p>matched those in other species, enabling the dive shapes to be classified as foraging,</p><p>searching and traveling behaviors. Right whales with thicker blubber layers were</p><p>found to perform longer ascent glides and shorter descent glides than those with</p><p>thinner blubber layers, consistent with the hypothesis that positive buoyancy does</p><p>influence their vertical diving behavior. During horizontal traveling, whales made</p><p>shallow dives to depths that were slightly deeper than those that would cause ad-</p><p>ditional costs due to wave drag. These dives appear to allow whales to both avoid</p><p>the costs of diving as well as the costs of swimming near the surface. Next, whales</p><p>were found to glide for 12% of the bottom phases of their foraging dives, and the</p><p>use of `stroke-glide' swimming did not prolong foraging duration from that used by</p><p>continuous swimmers. Drag coefficients estimated from these glides had an average</p><p>of 0.014 during foraging dives and 0.0052 during traveling, values which fall in the</p><p>range of those reported for other marine mammals. One numerical simulation deter-</p><p>mined drag forces to be comparable, while the other drastically underestimated the</p><p>drag of all behaviors. Finally, alterations to the behavioral budgets of these animals</p><p>demonstrated their cost of locomotion constitutes a small portion (8-12%) of the</p><p>total energy consumed and only extreme increases in traveling time could result in a</p><p>negative energy balance. In summary, these results show that locomotor costs are no</p><p>more expensive in this species than those of other cetaceans and that when removed</p><p>from all the other stressors on this population, these whales are not on an energetic</p><p>`knife edge'.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Locomotion in any environment requires the use of energy to overcome the physical&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;forces inherent in the environment. Most large marine vertebrates have evolved&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;streamlined fusiform body shapes to minimize the resistive force of drag when in&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;a neutral position, but nearly all behaviors result in some increase in that force.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Too much energy devoted to locomotion may reduce the available surplus necessary&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;for population-level factors such as reproduction. The population of North Atlantic&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;right whales has not recovered following legal protection due to decreased fecundity,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;including an increase in the intercalf interval, an increase in the years to first calf and&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;an increase in the number of nulliparous females in the population. This reproductive&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;impairment appears to be related to deficiencies in storing enough energy to meet the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;costs of reproduction. The goal of this study was to determine whether increases in&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;moving between prey patches at the cost of decreased foraging opportunities could&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;shift these whales into a situation of negative energy gain. The first step is to&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;understand the locomotor costs for this species for the key behaviors of traveling and&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;foraging.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study investigated the cost of locomotion in right whales by recording the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;submerged diving behaviors of free-ranging individuals in both their foraging habitat&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in the Bay of Fundy and their calving grounds in the South Atlantic Bight with a&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;suction-cupped archival tag. The data from the tags were used to quantify the oc-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;currence of different behaviors and their associated swimming behaviors and explore&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;three behavioral strategies that reduce locomotor costs. First, the influence that&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;changes in blubber thickness has on the buoyancy of these whales was investigated&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;by comparing the descent and ascent glide durations of individual whales with differ-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ent blubber thicknesses. Next, the depth of surface dives made by animals of different&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;sizes was related to the depth where additional wave drag is generated. Finally, the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;use of intermittent locomotion during foraging was investigated to understand how&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;much energy is saved by using this gait. The final piece in this study was to deter-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;mine the drag related to traveling and foraging behaviors from glides recorded by&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the tags and from two different numerical simulations of flow around whales. One, a&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;custom developed algorithm for multiphase flow, was used to determine the relative&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;drag, while a second commercial package was used to determine the absolute mag-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;nitude of the drag force on the simplest model, the traveling animal. The resulting&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;drag estimates were then used in a series of theoretical models that estimated the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;energetic profit remaining after shifts in the occurrence of traveling and searching&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;behaviors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The diving behavior of right whales can be classified into three stereotyped be-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;haviors that are characterized by differences in the time spent in different parts of the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;water column. The time budgets and swimming movements during these behaviors&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;matched those in other species, enabling the dive shapes to be classified as foraging,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;searching and traveling behaviors. Right whales with thicker blubber layers were&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;found to perform longer ascent glides and shorter descent glides than those with&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thinner blubber layers, consistent with the hypothesis that positive buoyancy does&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;influence their vertical diving behavior. During horizontal traveling, whales made&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;shallow dives to depths that were slightly deeper than those that would cause ad-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;ditional costs due to wave drag. These dives appear to allow whales to both avoid&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;the costs of diving as well as the costs of swimming near the surface. Next, whales&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;were found to glide for 12% of the bottom phases of their foraging dives, and the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;use of `stroke-glide&#x27; swimming did not prolong foraging duration from that used by&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;continuous swimmers. Drag coefficients estimated from these glides had an average&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;of 0.014 during foraging dives and 0.0052 during traveling, values which fall in the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;range of those reported for other marine mammals. One numerical simulation deter-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;mined drag forces to be comparable, while the other drastically underestimated the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;drag of all behaviors. Finally, alterations to the behavioral budgets of these animals&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;demonstrated their cost of locomotion constitutes a small portion (8-12%) of the&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;total energy consumed and only extreme increases in traveling time could result in a&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;negative energy balance. In summary, these results show that locomotor costs are no&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;more expensive in this species than those of other cetaceans and that when removed&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;from all the other stressors on this population, these whales are not on an energetic&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;`knife edge&#x27;.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Nousek McGregor, Anna Elizabeth"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Nowacek, Douglas P."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010","date_published":"2010","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:07:23Z","subjects":["Conservation Biology","Ecology","Biomechanics","behavior","Eubalaena glacialis","hydrodynamics","locomotor costs","marine mammal","North Atlantic right whale"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/10161/3088","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Nowacek, Douglas P."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Nousek McGregor, Anna Elizabeth"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2011-01-06T16:01:16Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2011-01-06T16:01:16Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2010"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Dissertation"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Conservation Biology","Ecology","Biomechanics","behavior","Eubalaena glacialis","hydrodynamics","locomotor costs","marine mammal","North Atlantic right whale"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/10161/3088"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Locomotion in any environment requires the use of energy to overcome the physical</p><p>forces inherent in the environment. Most large marine vertebrates have evolved</p><p>streamlined fusiform body shapes to minimize the resistive force of drag when in</p><p>a neutral position, but nearly all behaviors result in some increase in that force.</p><p>Too much energy devoted to locomotion may reduce the available surplus necessary</p><p>for population-level factors such as reproduction. The population of North Atlantic</p><p>right whales has not recovered following legal protection due to decreased fecundity,</p><p>including an increase in the intercalf interval, an increase in the years to first calf and</p><p>an increase in the number of nulliparous females in the population. This reproductive</p><p>impairment appears to be related to deficiencies in storing enough energy to meet the</p><p>costs of reproduction. The goal of this study was to determine whether increases in</p><p>moving between prey patches at the cost of decreased foraging opportunities could</p><p>shift these whales into a situation of negative energy gain. The first step is to</p><p>understand the locomotor costs for this species for the key behaviors of traveling and</p><p>foraging.</p><p>This study investigated the cost of locomotion in right whales by recording the</p><p>submerged diving behaviors of free-ranging individuals in both their foraging habitat</p><p>in the Bay of Fundy and their calving grounds in the South Atlantic Bight with a</p><p>suction-cupped archival tag. The data from the tags were used to quantify the oc-</p><p>currence of different behaviors and their associated swimming behaviors and explore</p><p>three behavioral strategies that reduce locomotor costs. First, the influence that</p><p>changes in blubber thickness has on the buoyancy of these whales was investigated</p><p>by comparing the descent and ascent glide durations of individual whales with differ-</p><p>ent blubber thicknesses. Next, the depth of surface dives made by animals of different</p><p>sizes was related to the depth where additional wave drag is generated. Finally, the</p><p>use of intermittent locomotion during foraging was investigated to understand how</p><p>much energy is saved by using this gait. The final piece in this study was to deter-</p><p>mine the drag related to traveling and foraging behaviors from glides recorded by</p><p>the tags and from two different numerical simulations of flow around whales. One, a</p><p>custom developed algorithm for multiphase flow, was used to determine the relative</p><p>drag, while a second commercial package was used to determine the absolute mag-</p><p>nitude of the drag force on the simplest model, the traveling animal. The resulting</p><p>drag estimates were then used in a series of theoretical models that estimated the</p><p>energetic profit remaining after shifts in the occurrence of traveling and searching</p><p>behaviors.</p><p>The diving behavior of right whales can be classified into three stereotyped be-</p><p>haviors that are characterized by differences in the time spent in different parts of the</p><p>water column. The time budgets and swimming movements during these behaviors</p><p>matched those in other species, enabling the dive shapes to be classified as foraging,</p><p>searching and traveling behaviors. Right whales with thicker blubber layers were</p><p>found to perform longer ascent glides and shorter descent glides than those with</p><p>thinner blubber layers, consistent with the hypothesis that positive buoyancy does</p><p>influence their vertical diving behavior. During horizontal traveling, whales made</p><p>shallow dives to depths that were slightly deeper than those that would cause ad-</p><p>ditional costs due to wave drag. These dives appear to allow whales to both avoid</p><p>the costs of diving as well as the costs of swimming near the surface. Next, whales</p><p>were found to glide for 12% of the bottom phases of their foraging dives, and the</p><p>use of `stroke-glide' swimming did not prolong foraging duration from that used by</p><p>continuous swimmers. Drag coefficients estimated from these glides had an average</p><p>of 0.014 during foraging dives and 0.0052 during traveling, values which fall in the</p><p>range of those reported for other marine mammals. One numerical simulation deter-</p><p>mined drag forces to be comparable, while the other drastically underestimated the</p><p>drag of all behaviors. Finally, alterations to the behavioral budgets of these animals</p><p>demonstrated their cost of locomotion constitutes a small portion (8-12%) of the</p><p>total energy consumed and only extreme increases in traveling time could result in a</p><p>negative energy balance. In summary, these results show that locomotor costs are no</p><p>more expensive in this species than those of other cetaceans and that when removed</p><p>from all the other stressors on this population, these whales are not on an energetic</p><p>`knife edge'.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The cost of locomotion in North Atlantic right whales (<italic>Eubalaena glacialis</italic>)"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Nowacek, Douglas P."],"dc:creator":["Nousek McGregor, Anna Elizabeth"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2011-01-06T16:01:16Z"],"dc:date.available":["2011-01-06T16:01:16Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2010"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Locomotion in any environment requires the use of energy to overcome the physical</p><p>forces inherent in the environment. Most large marine vertebrates have evolved</p><p>streamlined fusiform body shapes to minimize the resistive force of drag when in</p><p>a neutral position, but nearly all behaviors result in some increase in that force.</p><p>Too much energy devoted to locomotion may reduce the available surplus necessary</p><p>for population-level factors such as reproduction. The population of North Atlantic</p><p>right whales has not recovered following legal protection due to decreased fecundity,</p><p>including an increase in the intercalf interval, an increase in the years to first calf and</p><p>an increase in the number of nulliparous females in the population. This reproductive</p><p>impairment appears to be related to deficiencies in storing enough energy to meet the</p><p>costs of reproduction. The goal of this study was to determine whether increases in</p><p>moving between prey patches at the cost of decreased foraging opportunities could</p><p>shift these whales into a situation of negative energy gain. The first step is to</p><p>understand the locomotor costs for this species for the key behaviors of traveling and</p><p>foraging.</p><p>This study investigated the cost of locomotion in right whales by recording the</p><p>submerged diving behaviors of free-ranging individuals in both their foraging habitat</p><p>in the Bay of Fundy and their calving grounds in the South Atlantic Bight with a</p><p>suction-cupped archival tag. The data from the tags were used to quantify the oc-</p><p>currence of different behaviors and their associated swimming behaviors and explore</p><p>three behavioral strategies that reduce locomotor costs. First, the influence that</p><p>changes in blubber thickness has on the buoyancy of these whales was investigated</p><p>by comparing the descent and ascent glide durations of individual whales with differ-</p><p>ent blubber thicknesses. Next, the depth of surface dives made by animals of different</p><p>sizes was related to the depth where additional wave drag is generated. Finally, the</p><p>use of intermittent locomotion during foraging was investigated to understand how</p><p>much energy is saved by using this gait. The final piece in this study was to deter-</p><p>mine the drag related to traveling and foraging behaviors from glides recorded by</p><p>the tags and from two different numerical simulations of flow around whales. One, a</p><p>custom developed algorithm for multiphase flow, was used to determine the relative</p><p>drag, while a second commercial package was used to determine the absolute mag-</p><p>nitude of the drag force on the simplest model, the traveling animal. The resulting</p><p>drag estimates were then used in a series of theoretical models that estimated the</p><p>energetic profit remaining after shifts in the occurrence of traveling and searching</p><p>behaviors.</p><p>The diving behavior of right whales can be classified into three stereotyped be-</p><p>haviors that are characterized by differences in the time spent in different parts of the</p><p>water column. The time budgets and swimming movements during these behaviors</p><p>matched those in other species, enabling the dive shapes to be classified as foraging,</p><p>searching and traveling behaviors. Right whales with thicker blubber layers were</p><p>found to perform longer ascent glides and shorter descent glides than those with</p><p>thinner blubber layers, consistent with the hypothesis that positive buoyancy does</p><p>influence their vertical diving behavior. During horizontal traveling, whales made</p><p>shallow dives to depths that were slightly deeper than those that would cause ad-</p><p>ditional costs due to wave drag. These dives appear to allow whales to both avoid</p><p>the costs of diving as well as the costs of swimming near the surface. Next, whales</p><p>were found to glide for 12% of the bottom phases of their foraging dives, and the</p><p>use of `stroke-glide' swimming did not prolong foraging duration from that used by</p><p>continuous swimmers. Drag coefficients estimated from these glides had an average</p><p>of 0.014 during foraging dives and 0.0052 during traveling, values which fall in the</p><p>range of those reported for other marine mammals. One numerical simulation deter-</p><p>mined drag forces to be comparable, while the other drastically underestimated the</p><p>drag of all behaviors. Finally, alterations to the behavioral budgets of these animals</p><p>demonstrated their cost of locomotion constitutes a small portion (8-12%) of the</p><p>total energy consumed and only extreme increases in traveling time could result in a</p><p>negative energy balance. In summary, these results show that locomotor costs are no</p><p>more expensive in this species than those of other cetaceans and that when removed</p><p>from all the other stressors on this population, these whales are not on an energetic</p><p>`knife edge'.</p>"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/10161/3088"],"dc:subject":["Conservation Biology","Ecology","Biomechanics","behavior","Eubalaena glacialis","hydrodynamics","locomotor costs","marine mammal","North Atlantic right whale"],"dc:title":["The cost of locomotion in North Atlantic right whales (<italic>Eubalaena glacialis</italic>)"],"dc:type":["Dissertation"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:07:23Z"}