Back to results

Duke University

Anxiety as a determinant of differential responsivity to reward and punishment

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

Reward and punishment have been studied in the laboratory for their relative effects on learning processes and on perceptual processes they have been studied in the classroom for their relative effects on learning and on modification of performance of various motor and mental tasks; they have been studied in relation to intellectual, age and sex factors, and temperamental or personality factors; and they have recently been studied in a clinical setting in connection with problems of psychopathology, The studies concerned with personality variables reflect a broadening concern with personality dynamics that has accompanied the recent rapid expansion of interest in the clinical area of psychology. They strongly suggest that there are differences related to personality factors in the effects and perhaps the effectiveness of rewarding and punishing incentive conditions. It was to explore some of the implications of these studies and to extend the empirical data in this area that the present research was designed. It was to explore some of the implications of these studies and to extend the empirical data in this area that the present research was designed. To provide a framework for the discussion which follows the major aspects of two studies will be outlined.

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Barger, Benjamin, 1920-
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Eliot Rodnick, Chairman

Subjects

dc:subject × 3

Rights

Language dc:language
English

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Handle dc:identifier.uri
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13554
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:dukespace.lib.duke.edu:10161/13554

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Duke University
Base URL
dukespace.lib.duke.edu/server/oai/request
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Barger, Benjamin, 1920-. Anxiety as a determinant of differential responsivity to reward and punishment. 1952. https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13554