{"id":{"repo_id":"drake","oai_identifier":"oai:escholarshare.drake.edu:2092/2024"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/drake/oai:escholarshare.drake.edu:2092/2024","repository":{"repo_id":"drake","name":"Drake University","base_url":"https://escholarshare.drake.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The Contribution Of The Recovery Self Assessment To The Measurement Of Illness Management And Recovery","abstract":"Variables contributing to recovery from mental illness and substance abuse were investigated. These variables included empowerment, sense of community, illness management, self-esteem, self-determination, and the variables of agency, program, gender, age, general type of service, race, and length of service. The study was entirely from the person in recovery perspective, emphasizing self-determination. Participants came from agencies and were currently in recovery programs. The five measures were the Making Decisions – Empowerment Scale (MDE), the Illness Management and Recovery Client Self-rating (IMR), the Sense of Community Index-2 (SCI-2), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RES), and the Recovery Self Assessment-Revised (RSAR). Significant correlations existed between the IMR, the RES, and the RSA-R, but not between the RES and the RSA-R. None of the other variables proved significant in predicting any of the measures. The IMR Client Self-rating served as the dependent variable in a hierarchical multiple regression. Once again, the RES and the RSA-R were the only significant predictors of the IMR. Other hierarchical multiple regressions with the RES and the RSA-R as the dependent variable supported a new theory of recovery. Implications for assessment conclude the discussion of these results. In general, the RSA-R proved itself a valuable measure of recovery in the sample.","abstract_html":"Variables contributing to recovery from mental illness and substance abuse were investigated. These variables included empowerment, sense of community, illness management, self-esteem, self-determination, and the variables of agency, program, gender, age, general type of service, race, and length of service. The study was entirely from the person in recovery perspective, emphasizing self-determination. Participants came from agencies and were currently in recovery programs. The five measures were the Making Decisions – Empowerment Scale (MDE), the Illness Management and Recovery Client Self-rating (IMR), the Sense of Community Index-2 (SCI-2), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RES), and the Recovery Self Assessment-Revised (RSAR). Significant correlations existed between the IMR, the RES, and the RSA-R, but not between the RES and the RSA-R. None of the other variables proved significant in predicting any of the measures. The IMR Client Self-rating served as the dependent variable in a hierarchical multiple regression. Once again, the RES and the RSA-R were the only significant predictors of the IMR. Other hierarchical multiple regressions with the RES and the RSA-R as the dependent variable supported a new theory of recovery. Implications for assessment conclude the discussion of these results. In general, the RSA-R proved itself a valuable measure of recovery in the sample.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Knupp, Paul E., Jr."],"institution":"Drake University","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013-12","date_published":"2013-12","updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:20:19Z","subjects":["Mental illness--Assessment","Substance abuse--Assessment","Autonomy (Psychology)"],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/2092/2024","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Knupp, Paul E., Jr."]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2014-01-23T14:27:48Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2014-01-23T14:27:48Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2013-12"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Drake University"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Mental illness--Assessment","Substance abuse--Assessment","Autonomy (Psychology)"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/2092/2024"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["157 leaves"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Variables contributing to recovery from mental illness and substance abuse were investigated. These variables included empowerment, sense of community, illness management, self-esteem, self-determination, and the variables of agency, program, gender, age, general type of service, race, and length of service. The study was entirely from the person in recovery perspective, emphasizing self-determination. Participants came from agencies and were currently in recovery programs. The five measures were the Making Decisions – Empowerment Scale (MDE), the Illness Management and Recovery Client Self-rating (IMR), the Sense of Community Index-2 (SCI-2), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RES), and the Recovery Self Assessment-Revised (RSAR). Significant correlations existed between the IMR, the RES, and the RSA-R, but not between the RES and the RSA-R. None of the other variables proved significant in predicting any of the measures. The IMR Client Self-rating served as the dependent variable in a hierarchical multiple regression. Once again, the RES and the RSA-R were the only significant predictors of the IMR. Other hierarchical multiple regressions with the RES and the RSA-R as the dependent variable supported a new theory of recovery. Implications for assessment conclude the discussion of these results. In general, the RSA-R proved itself a valuable measure of recovery in the sample."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Contribution Of The Recovery Self Assessment To The Measurement Of Illness Management And Recovery"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Knupp, Paul E., Jr."],"dc:date.accessioned":["2014-01-23T14:27:48Z"],"dc:date.available":["2014-01-23T14:27:48Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2013-12"],"dc:description":["157 leaves"],"dc:description.abstract":["Variables contributing to recovery from mental illness and substance abuse were investigated. These variables included empowerment, sense of community, illness management, self-esteem, self-determination, and the variables of agency, program, gender, age, general type of service, race, and length of service. The study was entirely from the person in recovery perspective, emphasizing self-determination. Participants came from agencies and were currently in recovery programs. The five measures were the Making Decisions – Empowerment Scale (MDE), the Illness Management and Recovery Client Self-rating (IMR), the Sense of Community Index-2 (SCI-2), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RES), and the Recovery Self Assessment-Revised (RSAR). Significant correlations existed between the IMR, the RES, and the RSA-R, but not between the RES and the RSA-R. None of the other variables proved significant in predicting any of the measures. The IMR Client Self-rating served as the dependent variable in a hierarchical multiple regression. Once again, the RES and the RSA-R were the only significant predictors of the IMR. Other hierarchical multiple regressions with the RES and the RSA-R as the dependent variable supported a new theory of recovery. Implications for assessment conclude the discussion of these results. In general, the RSA-R proved itself a valuable measure of recovery in the sample."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/2092/2024"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:publisher":["Drake University"],"dc:subject":["Mental illness--Assessment","Substance abuse--Assessment","Autonomy (Psychology)"],"dc:title":["The Contribution Of The Recovery Self Assessment To The Measurement Of Illness Management And Recovery"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:20:19Z"}