Back to results

Dominican University of California

The Homework Debate: Arguments For/Against Homework

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

<p>The study of homework and its implications that it is effective in a child’s ability to retain information has constantly been in question since the idea of homework was adopted over a hundred years ago. One of the main goals in education is high student performance. The United States has consistently placed in the middle of all industrial nations in standardized tests, and researchers have been trying to figure out why. Homework has become one of the main areas of study into the United States low performance in student achievement. This paper examines the many arguments for and against homework. In the past, homework has often paralleled history’s attitude toward children and their development. Recent studies show that homework is only beneficial to high school students, yet all schools still use homework as a crucial portion of their curriculum. Researchers who are for homework believe that doing nightly homework can help children develop character traits such as responsibility, discipline, and motivation. Researchers who are against homework believe that homework can cause children to adopt bad habits because homework is often unsupervised. Researchers continue to search for answers here and abroad.</p>

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Science
Level thesis:degree_level
Master's Thesis
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Education
Year
2003

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Pitti, Craig

Subjects

dc:subject × 1

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:scholar.dominican.edu:education-print-theses-1196

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
Dominican University of California
Base URL
scholar.dominican.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Pitti, Craig. The Homework Debate: Arguments For/Against Homework. Master's Thesis thesis, 2003. https://scholar.dominican.edu/education-print-theses/197