The Validiity and Reliability of the "Draw a Rosebush" Art Assessment to Discriminate Between Abuse and Non-Abuse in Adolescents
type: CreativeWork
description: Calculations determined the reliability and validity of the "Draw a Rosebush" art assessment to differentiate between abused and non-abused subjects. Twenty subjects, average age 15, were balanced In number for group and gender. Relaxation, drawing, and post-drawing inquiry of each subject was followed by data analysis. Six raters analyzed 14 drawing characteristics and 13 statement characteristics. Standardized procedures.and forms were novel. Results demonstrated high reliability for eight characteristics (perspective, color use, and statement sorting, and statements about flowers, stems and branches, environment, appearance and climate). Reliability was borderline for 14 other characteristics (statements about the rosebush, leaves, thorns, roots, caretakers, feelings and sorted statements, drawings, first statements, and drawings with first statements). Validity was poor for all 27 drawing and statement characteristics (those listed plus hesitation, concern, care, concentration and drawing placement). Differentiation was shown on 18 characteristics (statements about rosebush, leaves, stems and branches, thorns, roots environment, appearance, caretaker, climate, feelings, sorted statements and drawing characteristics of perspective, rhythm, rule, complexity, simplexlty, expansion, compression. Integration, disintegration, growth, and poverty). Future research should Include objective guidelines to Improve the Instrument before retest.
abstract: Calculations determined the reliability and validity of the "Draw a Rosebush" art assessment to differentiate between abused and non-abused subjects. Twenty subjects, average age 15, were balanced In number for group and gender. Relaxation, drawing, and post-drawing inquiry of each subject was followed by data analysis. Six raters analyzed 14 drawing characteristics and 13 statement characteristics. Standardized procedures.and forms were novel. Results demonstrated high reliability for eight characteristics (perspective, color use, and statement sorting, and statements about flowers, stems and branches, environment, appearance and climate). Reliability was borderline for 14 other characteristics (statements about the rosebush, leaves, thorns, roots, caretakers, feelings and sorted statements, drawings, first statements, and drawings with first statements). Validity was poor for all 27 drawing and statement characteristics (those listed plus hesitation, concern, care, concentration and drawing placement). Differentiation was shown on 18 characteristics (statements about rosebush, leaves, stems and branches, thorns, roots environment, appearance, caretaker, climate, feelings, sorted statements and drawing characteristics of perspective, rhythm, rule, complexity, simplexlty, expansion, compression. Integration, disintegration, growth, and poverty). Future research should Include objective guidelines to Improve the Instrument before retest.
author: Schapper, Maura Katrin
keywords: Art Therapy, Counseling Psychology
date published: 1993-01-01T08:00:00Z
date modified: 2026-07-24T02:06:14Z
provider: Dominican University of California
publisher: Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations
type: WebPage
source organization: Dominican University of California