Back to results

DePaul University

Working women and the Lilly Ledbetter Act: a case study on misleading rhetoric of equal pay

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

<p>Since the passage of the Equal Pay Act of 1963, the wage gap in the United States has only decreased by eighteen cents; signaling that the battle over fair pay for women has gone on for too long. I argue that the neoliberal rhetoric around equal pay has to change to an intersectional approach where women can make legal claims based on many experiences of discrimination. I use the Lilly Ledbetter Paycheck Fairness Act as a case study to examine the history of equal pay in the United States and to provide recommendations on the future of equal pay.</p>

Degree

thesis:*
Level thesis:degree_level
Thesis
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Women & Gender Studies
Year dc:date.available
2014

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • DeBoer, Celia A

Subjects

dc:subject × 5

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/162
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:via.library.depaul.edu:etd-1167

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
DePaul University
Base URL
via.library.depaul.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

DeBoer, Celia A. Working women and the Lilly Ledbetter Act: a case study on misleading rhetoric of equal pay. Thesis thesis, 2014. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/162