Since the early 2000s, queer organizations have been at the forefront of exposing and challenging an Israeli government sponsored public relations campaign named Brand Israel. Brand Israel advertizing campaigns portray Israel as a safe-haven for gays and lesbians and Palestine as a regressive, violent and homophobic place as a way of justifying the Israeli occupation and colonial domination of Palestine. Activists have used the term \"pinkwashing\" to describe this rhetorical strategy. This thesis explores the intersections between gender, race, sexuality and settler-colonialism and their implications for anti-pinkwashing activism. I examine materials by Stand With Us and Blue Star, two prominent Israel advocacy groups that use Brand Israel techniques. Brand Israel materials themselves reveal that this discourse relies on orientalist discourses about Arab women and queer criminal archetypes that have held persuasive power for hundreds of years. I draw on the work of transgender and Arab feminist scholars and activists who have discussed how gender and race categories have been produced by colonial processes and have developed resistance strategies based at the intersection between gender, sexuality, and race. To resist Brand Israel campaigns effectively, activists need to understand how Brand Israel rhetoric is arise from a history of racist, colonial discourses.
","abstract_html":"<p>Since the early 2000s, queer organizations have been at the forefront of exposing and challenging an Israeli government sponsored public relations campaign named Brand Israel. Brand Israel advertizing campaigns portray Israel as a safe-haven for gays and lesbians and Palestine as a regressive, violent and homophobic place as a way of justifying the Israeli occupation and colonial domination of Palestine. Activists have used the term "pinkwashing" to describe this rhetorical strategy. This thesis explores the intersections between gender, race, sexuality and settler-colonialism and their implications for anti-pinkwashing activism. I examine materials by Stand With Us and Blue Star, two prominent Israel advocacy groups that use Brand Israel techniques. Brand Israel materials themselves reveal that this discourse relies on orientalist discourses about Arab women and queer criminal archetypes that have held persuasive power for hundreds of years. I draw on the work of transgender and Arab feminist scholars and activists who have discussed how gender and race categories have been produced by colonial processes and have developed resistance strategies based at the intersection between gender, sexuality, and race. To resist Brand Israel campaigns effectively, activists need to understand how Brand Israel rhetoric is arise from a history of racist, colonial discourses.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Ellison, Joy"],"institution":null,"degree_name":null,"degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Women & Gender Studies","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2013,"date_issued":"2013-08-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2013-08-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:03:52Z","subjects":["brand Israel","Palestine","colonialism","Arab feminist theory","transgender theory"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/149","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Ellison, Joy"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2013-08-14T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Women & Gender Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["brand Israel","Palestine","colonialism","Arab feminist theory","transgender theory"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/149"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Since the early 2000s, queer organizations have been at the forefront of exposing and challenging an Israeli government sponsored public relations campaign named Brand Israel. Brand Israel advertizing campaigns portray Israel as a safe-haven for gays and lesbians and Palestine as a regressive, violent and homophobic place as a way of justifying the Israeli occupation and colonial domination of Palestine. Activists have used the term \"pinkwashing\" to describe this rhetorical strategy. This thesis explores the intersections between gender, race, sexuality and settler-colonialism and their implications for anti-pinkwashing activism. I examine materials by Stand With Us and Blue Star, two prominent Israel advocacy groups that use Brand Israel techniques. Brand Israel materials themselves reveal that this discourse relies on orientalist discourses about Arab women and queer criminal archetypes that have held persuasive power for hundreds of years. I draw on the work of transgender and Arab feminist scholars and activists who have discussed how gender and race categories have been produced by colonial processes and have developed resistance strategies based at the intersection between gender, sexuality, and race. To resist Brand Israel campaigns effectively, activists need to understand how Brand Israel rhetoric is arise from a history of racist, colonial discourses.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Recycled rhetoric: brand Israel \"pinkwashing\" in historical context"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Ellison, Joy"],"dc:date.available":["2013-08-14T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Since the early 2000s, queer organizations have been at the forefront of exposing and challenging an Israeli government sponsored public relations campaign named Brand Israel. Brand Israel advertizing campaigns portray Israel as a safe-haven for gays and lesbians and Palestine as a regressive, violent and homophobic place as a way of justifying the Israeli occupation and colonial domination of Palestine. Activists have used the term \"pinkwashing\" to describe this rhetorical strategy. This thesis explores the intersections between gender, race, sexuality and settler-colonialism and their implications for anti-pinkwashing activism. I examine materials by Stand With Us and Blue Star, two prominent Israel advocacy groups that use Brand Israel techniques. Brand Israel materials themselves reveal that this discourse relies on orientalist discourses about Arab women and queer criminal archetypes that have held persuasive power for hundreds of years. I draw on the work of transgender and Arab feminist scholars and activists who have discussed how gender and race categories have been produced by colonial processes and have developed resistance strategies based at the intersection between gender, sexuality, and race. To resist Brand Israel campaigns effectively, activists need to understand how Brand Israel rhetoric is arise from a history of racist, colonial discourses.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/149"],"dc:subject":["brand Israel","Palestine","colonialism","Arab feminist theory","transgender theory"],"dc:title":["Recycled rhetoric: brand Israel \"pinkwashing\" in historical context"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Women & Gender Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:03:52Z"}