{"id":{"repo_id":"denver","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.du.edu:etd-3436"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/denver/oai:digitalcommons.du.edu:etd-3436","repository":{"repo_id":"denver","name":"University of Denver","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.du.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The Elephant in the Baithak: Tabla and Audio Technological Discourse","abstract":"<p>This thesis discusses how power, status, and performance practices play out between performers of <em>tabla</em> (North Indian hand drums) and audio engineers. To do so, I analyze engineer, performer, and music critic discourse surrounding <em>tabla</em> performances and technology to place it within a broader scholarly debate regarding recording technology, cultural/technological capital, technological determinism, and agency. I extend Christopher Scales’s (2012) concept of “recording culture” to “live sound culture,” or the behaviors, power struggles, and labor surrounding <em>tabla</em> mic’ing and amplification. I argue that audio technology separates the artist’s sound into several domains of control (stage, hall, recording, playback), each controlled by various human and non-human actors. These multiple sound fields produce various disruptions in collaboration between performers and engineers but also the opportunity for co-construction of sound and meaning.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;This thesis discusses how power, status, and performance practices play out between performers of &lt;em&gt;tabla&lt;/em&gt; (North Indian hand drums) and audio engineers. To do so, I analyze engineer, performer, and music critic discourse surrounding &lt;em&gt;tabla&lt;/em&gt; performances and technology to place it within a broader scholarly debate regarding recording technology, cultural/technological capital, technological determinism, and agency. I extend Christopher Scales’s (2012) concept of “recording culture” to “live sound culture,” or the behaviors, power struggles, and labor surrounding &lt;em&gt;tabla&lt;/em&gt; mic’ing and amplification. I argue that audio technology separates the artist’s sound into several domains of control (stage, hall, recording, playback), each controlled by various human and non-human actors. These multiple sound fields produce various disruptions in collaboration between performers and engineers but also the opportunity for co-construction of sound and meaning.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Thom, Tyler"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"M.A. in Music","degree_level":"Masters Thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Sarah Morelli","Jack Sheinbaum","Aaron Schneider","Dheepa Sundaram","Aleysia Whitmore"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024-06-15T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2024-06-15T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:01:48Z","subjects":["Amplification","Audio","Hindustani","Live sound","Tabla","Technology","Arts and Humanities","History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology","Music","Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology","Other Music"],"languages":["English (eng)"],"rights":["<p>Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.</p>"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/2441","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Sarah Morelli","Jack Sheinbaum","Aaron Schneider","Dheepa Sundaram","Aleysia Whitmore"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Thom, Tyler"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A. in Music"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Amplification","Audio","Hindustani","Live sound","Tabla","Technology","Arts and Humanities","History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology","Music","Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology","Other Music"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English (eng)"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["<p>Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.</p>"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/2441"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>This thesis discusses how power, status, and performance practices play out between performers of <em>tabla</em> (North Indian hand drums) and audio engineers. To do so, I analyze engineer, performer, and music critic discourse surrounding <em>tabla</em> performances and technology to place it within a broader scholarly debate regarding recording technology, cultural/technological capital, technological determinism, and agency. I extend Christopher Scales’s (2012) concept of “recording culture” to “live sound culture,” or the behaviors, power struggles, and labor surrounding <em>tabla</em> mic’ing and amplification. I argue that audio technology separates the artist’s sound into several domains of control (stage, hall, recording, playback), each controlled by various human and non-human actors. These multiple sound fields produce various disruptions in collaboration between performers and engineers but also the opportunity for co-construction of sound and meaning.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Elephant in the Baithak: Tabla and Audio Technological Discourse"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Sarah Morelli","Jack Sheinbaum","Aaron Schneider","Dheepa Sundaram","Aleysia Whitmore"],"dc:creator":["Thom, Tyler"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>This thesis discusses how power, status, and performance practices play out between performers of <em>tabla</em> (North Indian hand drums) and audio engineers. To do so, I analyze engineer, performer, and music critic discourse surrounding <em>tabla</em> performances and technology to place it within a broader scholarly debate regarding recording technology, cultural/technological capital, technological determinism, and agency. I extend Christopher Scales’s (2012) concept of “recording culture” to “live sound culture,” or the behaviors, power struggles, and labor surrounding <em>tabla</em> mic’ing and amplification. I argue that audio technology separates the artist’s sound into several domains of control (stage, hall, recording, playback), each controlled by various human and non-human actors. These multiple sound fields produce various disruptions in collaboration between performers and engineers but also the opportunity for co-construction of sound and meaning.</p>"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/2441"],"dc:language":["English (eng)"],"dc:rights":["<p>Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.</p>"],"dc:subject":["Amplification","Audio","Hindustani","Live sound","Tabla","Technology","Arts and Humanities","History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology","Music","Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology","Other Music"],"dc:title":["The Elephant in the Baithak: Tabla and Audio Technological Discourse"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A. in Music"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:01:48Z"}