Abstract
dc:description.abstract<p>This thesis aims to explore the evolution of research methodologies in the minimum wage debate, focusing on the contrasting perspectives of the neoclassical and institutional models. By examining the changes in research methodologies employed by economists from these two schools, this study seeks to shed the light on the shifting paradigms and the impact of these changes on our understanding of minimum wage policies and their implications. This highlights the limitations of relying on one economic school of thought in understanding socio-economic phenomena complexations and policy decisions. As well as it creates the necessity to critical evaluation of the method of economic research design, and essential need to adopt methodological pluralism which built upon diverse range of theoretical frameworks and empirical methodologies to understand the complexities inherent in real-world economic phenomena.</p>
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- M.A. in Economics
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Masters Thesis
- Year
- 2024
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- ALRebh, Ghofran
- Contributors dc:contributor
-
- Markus Schneider
- Robert Urquhart
- Christina Kreps
- Henning Schwardt
Subjects
dc:subject × 10Rights
dc:rights- Statement dc:rights
-
- <p>Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.</p>
- Language dc:language
- English (eng)
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Repository record dc:identifier
- https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/2396
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:digitalcommons.du.edu:etd-3389