{"id":{"repo_id":"denver","oai_identifier":"oai:digitalcommons.du.edu:etd-1817"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/denver/oai:digitalcommons.du.edu:etd-1817","repository":{"repo_id":"denver","name":"University of Denver","base_url":"https://digitalcommons.du.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"The Implementation of Restorative Justice in Iceland: A Comparison of Police- and Expert-Led Conferencing","abstract":"<p>On first of October 2006 the Ministry of Justice in Iceland launch a restorative justice pilot project. Building on the pilot project data, this thesis evaluates the implementation of restorative justice into the criminal justice system in Iceland by asking victims, offenders and other participants in police- and expert-led conferencing to answer questionnaires' relating to these two types of restorative justice practices to crime. The thesis compares its results with findings from a review conducted by Paul McCold (1998) who more than a decade ago challenged concerns on police facilitated conferencing. The data examined in the present thesis support Paul McCold's findings that police officers are capable of conducting conferences in a highly restorative manner when dealing with minor degree offences and that conferencing is an effective restorative justice practice that should be encouraged when conducted by police officers or trained professionals.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;On first of October 2006 the Ministry of Justice in Iceland launch a restorative justice pilot project. Building on the pilot project data, this thesis evaluates the implementation of restorative justice into the criminal justice system in Iceland by asking victims, offenders and other participants in police- and expert-led conferencing to answer questionnaires&#x27; relating to these two types of restorative justice practices to crime. The thesis compares its results with findings from a review conducted by Paul McCold (1998) who more than a decade ago challenged concerns on police facilitated conferencing. The data examined in the present thesis support Paul McCold&#x27;s findings that police officers are capable of conducting conferences in a highly restorative manner when dealing with minor degree offences and that conferencing is an effective restorative justice practice that should be encouraged when conducted by police officers or trained professionals.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Hafsteinsson, Hafsteinn Gunnar"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"M.A.","degree_level":"Masters Thesis","degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Tamra Pearson d´Estée, Ph.D.","Cynthia V. Fukami","P. Bruce Uhrmacher"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2010-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:02:53Z","subjects":["Conference","Paul McCold","Police conferencing","Restorative justice","Retributive justice","Victim-offender mediation","Law","Peace and Conflict Studies","Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["<p>Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.</p>"],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/818","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Tamra Pearson d´Estée, Ph.D.","Cynthia V. Fukami","P. Bruce Uhrmacher"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Hafsteinsson, Hafsteinn Gunnar"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2001-01-01T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Masters Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["M.A."]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Conference","Paul McCold","Police conferencing","Restorative justice","Retributive justice","Victim-offender mediation","Law","Peace and Conflict Studies","Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["<p>Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.</p>"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/818"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>On first of October 2006 the Ministry of Justice in Iceland launch a restorative justice pilot project. Building on the pilot project data, this thesis evaluates the implementation of restorative justice into the criminal justice system in Iceland by asking victims, offenders and other participants in police- and expert-led conferencing to answer questionnaires' relating to these two types of restorative justice practices to crime. The thesis compares its results with findings from a review conducted by Paul McCold (1998) who more than a decade ago challenged concerns on police facilitated conferencing. The data examined in the present thesis support Paul McCold's findings that police officers are capable of conducting conferences in a highly restorative manner when dealing with minor degree offences and that conferencing is an effective restorative justice practice that should be encouraged when conducted by police officers or trained professionals.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:format","label":"Dc Format","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Implementation of Restorative Justice in Iceland: A Comparison of Police- and Expert-Led Conferencing"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Tamra Pearson d´Estée, Ph.D.","Cynthia V. Fukami","P. Bruce Uhrmacher"],"dc:creator":["Hafsteinsson, Hafsteinn Gunnar"],"dc:date.available":["2001-01-01T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>On first of October 2006 the Ministry of Justice in Iceland launch a restorative justice pilot project. Building on the pilot project data, this thesis evaluates the implementation of restorative justice into the criminal justice system in Iceland by asking victims, offenders and other participants in police- and expert-led conferencing to answer questionnaires' relating to these two types of restorative justice practices to crime. The thesis compares its results with findings from a review conducted by Paul McCold (1998) who more than a decade ago challenged concerns on police facilitated conferencing. The data examined in the present thesis support Paul McCold's findings that police officers are capable of conducting conferences in a highly restorative manner when dealing with minor degree offences and that conferencing is an effective restorative justice practice that should be encouraged when conducted by police officers or trained professionals.</p>"],"dc:format":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier":["https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/818"],"dc:language":["en"],"dc:rights":["<p>Copyright is held by the author. User is responsible for all copyright compliance.</p>"],"dc:subject":["Conference","Paul McCold","Police conferencing","Restorative justice","Retributive justice","Victim-offender mediation","Law","Peace and Conflict Studies","Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration"],"dc:title":["The Implementation of Restorative Justice in Iceland: A Comparison of Police- and Expert-Led Conferencing"],"thesis:degree_level":["Masters Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["M.A."]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:02:53Z"}