GUYANA-VENEZUELA BORDER DISPUTE: SEEKING A PEACEFUL SOLUTION
type: CreativeWork
description: The purpose of this thesis is to examine and evaluate the effectiveness of those dispute settlement mechanisms that are capable of resolving the Guyana-Venezuela border dispute. This thesis will analyze those legal principles and/or techniques of the International Court of Justice, mediation and the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which are indispensable for dispute resolution. I argue that a resolution is significant for the stability of the international community. Guyana and Venezuela possess economic and political interests in the disputed Essequibo region. Venezuela’s predilection for bilateral negotiations contradicts Guyana’s request for a judicial solution. These extreme positions are not novel but were shaped by the history of the dispute. A historical analysis of the Guyana-Venezuela border dispute will highlight those reasons for their extreme positions and reinforce the degree of complexity which is often associated with dispute resolution. The border dispute was ‘settled’ by a tribunal in 1899 but it persists. Thus, the thesis will test whether the dispute is based on colonial inheritance or is solely based on the economic value associated with the Essequibo region. This analysis will help to evaluate the applicability of the aforementioned dispute settlement mechanisms. Additionally, it will predict those legal principles and/or techniques which are pertinent and necessary for the resolution of the dispute. Ultimately, the thesis will conclude by critically evaluating and predicting the roles and effectiveness of the International Court of Justice, mediation and the Permanent Court of Arbitration towards resolving this dispute. ‘Resolution’ will not be limited to a decision being made. Instead, ‘resolution’ will include the level of compliance and current relationship status of states that had their dispute settled by the International Court of Justice, mediation or the Permanent Court of Arbitration. One of the three dispute settlement mechanisms will…
abstract: The purpose of this thesis is to examine and evaluate the effectiveness of those dispute settlement mechanisms that are capable of resolving the Guyana-Venezuela border dispute. This thesis will analyze those legal principles and/or techniques of the International Court of Justice, mediation and the Permanent Court of Arbitration, which are indispensable for dispute resolution. I argue that a resolution is significant for the stability of the international community. Guyana and Venezuela possess economic and political interests in the disputed Essequibo region. Venezuela’s predilection for bilateral negotiations contradicts Guyana’s request for a judicial solution. These extreme positions are not novel but were shaped by the history of the dispute. A historical analysis of the Guyana-Venezuela border dispute will highlight those reasons for their extreme positions and reinforce the degree of complexity which is often associated with dispute resolution. The border dispute was ‘settled’ by a tribunal in 1899 but it persists. Thus, the thesis will test whether the dispute is based on colonial inheritance or is solely based on the economic value associated with the Essequibo region. This analysis will help to evaluate the applicability of the aforementioned dispute settlement mechanisms. Additionally, it will predict those legal principles and/or techniques which are pertinent and necessary for the resolution of the dispute. Ultimately, the thesis will conclude by critically evaluating and predicting the roles and effectiveness of the International Court of Justice, mediation and the Permanent Court of Arbitration towards resolving this dispute. ‘Resolution’ will not be limited to a decision being made. Instead, ‘resolution’ will include the level of compliance and current relationship status of states that had their dispute settled by the International Court of Justice, mediation or the Permanent Court of Arbitration. One of the three dispute settlement mechanisms will…
author: Homer, Aaron Marcus
keywords: territorial dispute, international law, dispute settlement mechanism, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration, International Relations, Peace and Conflict Studies
date published: 2018-01-01T08:00:00Z
date modified: 2026-07-24T01:57:14Z
provider: City University of New York - City College
publisher: Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations
type: WebPage
source organization: City University of New York - City College