Against technological ubiquity, the philosopher, the ecologist, the theologian, the psychologist, the radical, the reactionary, and the poet have each responded. This analysis seeks to explicate the nature of such responses, as well as to explore their contemporary form and elucidate what those presently publishing might offer as programs toward the future. In order to do this, what follows is broken up into a series of sections, each focused on what I have perceived to be the foremost themes present throughout technological critique: becoming, freedom, identity, faith, space, time, and progress. Prior to such thematic excavations, this analysis offers a two-fold introduction. The first component is focused on the role of philosophy amidst technological ubiquity, with the following segment centered on the meaning of “technology” and its underlying essence. Written from a digital humanist perspective, this analysis is intended as an accessible artifact for my field and concludes with a brief advancement of the need for critical approaches to technological tools such as those discussed herein, as well as an explanation of the importance of convivial and conjunctive spaces through which new relationships to and applications of technology might be devised.
","abstract_html":"<p>Against technological ubiquity, the philosopher, the ecologist, the theologian, the psychologist, the radical, the reactionary, and the poet have each responded. This analysis seeks to explicate the nature of such responses, as well as to explore their contemporary form and elucidate what those presently publishing might offer as programs toward the future. In order to do this, what follows is broken up into a series of sections, each focused on what I have perceived to be the foremost themes present throughout technological critique: becoming, freedom, identity, faith, space, time, and progress. Prior to such thematic excavations, this analysis offers a two-fold introduction. The first component is focused on the role of philosophy amidst technological ubiquity, with the following segment centered on the meaning of “technology” and its underlying essence. Written from a digital humanist perspective, this analysis is intended as an accessible artifact for my field and concludes with a brief advancement of the need for critical approaches to technological tools such as those discussed herein, as well as an explanation of the importance of convivial and conjunctive spaces through which new relationships to and applications of technology might be devised.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Dodd, Hampton A"],"institution":"The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York","degree_name":"Master of Arts","degree_level":"Master","degree_discipline":"Digital Humanities","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Kevin L. Ferguson"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024-02-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2024-02-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:58:39Z","subjects":["Continental Philosophy","Digital Humanities","Philosophy of Technology","Critical Theory of Technology","Technocriticism"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/5697","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Kevin L. Ferguson"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Dodd, Hampton A"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2024-01-31T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Digital Humanities"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Master"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Continental Philosophy","Digital Humanities","Philosophy of Technology","Critical Theory of Technology","Technocriticism"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/5697"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Against technological ubiquity, the philosopher, the ecologist, the theologian, the psychologist, the radical, the reactionary, and the poet have each responded. This analysis seeks to explicate the nature of such responses, as well as to explore their contemporary form and elucidate what those presently publishing might offer as programs toward the future. In order to do this, what follows is broken up into a series of sections, each focused on what I have perceived to be the foremost themes present throughout technological critique: becoming, freedom, identity, faith, space, time, and progress. Prior to such thematic excavations, this analysis offers a two-fold introduction. The first component is focused on the role of philosophy amidst technological ubiquity, with the following segment centered on the meaning of “technology” and its underlying essence. Written from a digital humanist perspective, this analysis is intended as an accessible artifact for my field and concludes with a brief advancement of the need for critical approaches to technological tools such as those discussed herein, as well as an explanation of the importance of convivial and conjunctive spaces through which new relationships to and applications of technology might be devised.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The True and Only Technic: Technological Ubiquity and its Critics, Heretics, and Zealots"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Kevin L. Ferguson"],"dc:creator":["Dodd, Hampton A"],"dc:date.available":["2024-01-31T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Against technological ubiquity, the philosopher, the ecologist, the theologian, the psychologist, the radical, the reactionary, and the poet have each responded. This analysis seeks to explicate the nature of such responses, as well as to explore their contemporary form and elucidate what those presently publishing might offer as programs toward the future. In order to do this, what follows is broken up into a series of sections, each focused on what I have perceived to be the foremost themes present throughout technological critique: becoming, freedom, identity, faith, space, time, and progress. Prior to such thematic excavations, this analysis offers a two-fold introduction. The first component is focused on the role of philosophy amidst technological ubiquity, with the following segment centered on the meaning of “technology” and its underlying essence. Written from a digital humanist perspective, this analysis is intended as an accessible artifact for my field and concludes with a brief advancement of the need for critical approaches to technological tools such as those discussed herein, as well as an explanation of the importance of convivial and conjunctive spaces through which new relationships to and applications of technology might be devised.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/5697"],"dc:subject":["Continental Philosophy","Digital Humanities","Philosophy of Technology","Critical Theory of Technology","Technocriticism"],"dc:title":["The True and Only Technic: Technological Ubiquity and its Critics, Heretics, and Zealots"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Digital Humanities"],"thesis:degree_level":["Master"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts"],"thesis:institution_name":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:58:39Z"}