This thesis analyzes the multifaceted debate over the use of comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) in United States public schools, while also emphasizing the ways in which withholding CSE is a strategy to uphold the white supremacist patriarchy. The work begins by historically framing the evolution of sexuality education through the United States’ history. This leads to the current discourse around CSE and the ways in which it is the optimal support for American youth today. After setting this foundation, the thesis looks at conservative figures and groups who are seeking to prevent public school adoption of CSE standards, as well as censoring the mention of any topics remotely connected to sexuality. Their work has led to the proliferation of calls for parental rights in education. While conservatives are the most vocal in opposing CSE, it is also vital to consider other cultural perceptions of sexuality. Many minority and immigrant families may hold their own cultural and religious views of sexuality education that would lead them to stand against CSE. If this resistance is ignored, it sets CSE up for failure, which in turn will most negatively impact students of color and LGBTQIA+ students. This failure would directly contribute to white supremacist patriarchal ideals dominating American culture. In the end, this thesis aims to point to ways that CSE can be set up for success and meet the wide needs of youth and community stakeholders.
","abstract_html":"<p>This thesis analyzes the multifaceted debate over the use of comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) in United States public schools, while also emphasizing the ways in which withholding CSE is a strategy to uphold the white supremacist patriarchy. The work begins by historically framing the evolution of sexuality education through the United States’ history. This leads to the current discourse around CSE and the ways in which it is the optimal support for American youth today. After setting this foundation, the thesis looks at conservative figures and groups who are seeking to prevent public school adoption of CSE standards, as well as censoring the mention of any topics remotely connected to sexuality. Their work has led to the proliferation of calls for parental rights in education. While conservatives are the most vocal in opposing CSE, it is also vital to consider other cultural perceptions of sexuality. Many minority and immigrant families may hold their own cultural and religious views of sexuality education that would lead them to stand against CSE. If this resistance is ignored, it sets CSE up for failure, which in turn will most negatively impact students of color and LGBTQIA+ students. This failure would directly contribute to white supremacist patriarchal ideals dominating American culture. In the end, this thesis aims to point to ways that CSE can be set up for success and meet the wide needs of youth and community stakeholders.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Anderson, Bryan Z"],"institution":"The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York","degree_name":"Master of Arts","degree_level":"Master","degree_discipline":"Liberal Studies","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Nathalie Etoke"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["David Humphries"],"year":2023,"date_issued":"2023-06-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2023-06-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:58:39Z","subjects":["American Politics","Curriculum and Social Inquiry","Developmental Psychology","Educational Methods","Educational Sociology","Education Policy","Family, Life Course, and Society","Gender and Sexuality","Health Policy","Politics and Social Change","Race and Ethnicity","Social Justice","Social Psychology","Social Psychology and Interaction","Sociology of Culture","Sociology of Religion","sexual education","white supremacy","patriarchy","LGBTQIA+","parental rights"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/5266","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Nathalie Etoke"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["David Humphries"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Anderson, Bryan Z"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2023-06-01T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Liberal Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Master"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["American Politics","Curriculum and Social Inquiry","Developmental Psychology","Educational Methods","Educational Sociology","Education Policy","Family, Life Course, and Society","Gender and Sexuality","Health Policy","Politics and Social Change","Race and Ethnicity","Social Justice","Social Psychology","Social Psychology and Interaction","Sociology of Culture","Sociology of Religion","sexual education","white supremacy","patriarchy","LGBTQIA+","parental rights"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/5266"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis analyzes the multifaceted debate over the use of comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) in United States public schools, while also emphasizing the ways in which withholding CSE is a strategy to uphold the white supremacist patriarchy. The work begins by historically framing the evolution of sexuality education through the United States’ history. This leads to the current discourse around CSE and the ways in which it is the optimal support for American youth today. After setting this foundation, the thesis looks at conservative figures and groups who are seeking to prevent public school adoption of CSE standards, as well as censoring the mention of any topics remotely connected to sexuality. Their work has led to the proliferation of calls for parental rights in education. While conservatives are the most vocal in opposing CSE, it is also vital to consider other cultural perceptions of sexuality. Many minority and immigrant families may hold their own cultural and religious views of sexuality education that would lead them to stand against CSE. If this resistance is ignored, it sets CSE up for failure, which in turn will most negatively impact students of color and LGBTQIA+ students. This failure would directly contribute to white supremacist patriarchal ideals dominating American culture. In the end, this thesis aims to point to ways that CSE can be set up for success and meet the wide needs of youth and community stakeholders.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Conservative and Cultural Clashes with Comprehensive Sexuality Education"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Nathalie Etoke"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["David Humphries"],"dc:creator":["Anderson, Bryan Z"],"dc:date.available":["2023-06-01T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis analyzes the multifaceted debate over the use of comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) in United States public schools, while also emphasizing the ways in which withholding CSE is a strategy to uphold the white supremacist patriarchy. The work begins by historically framing the evolution of sexuality education through the United States’ history. This leads to the current discourse around CSE and the ways in which it is the optimal support for American youth today. After setting this foundation, the thesis looks at conservative figures and groups who are seeking to prevent public school adoption of CSE standards, as well as censoring the mention of any topics remotely connected to sexuality. Their work has led to the proliferation of calls for parental rights in education. While conservatives are the most vocal in opposing CSE, it is also vital to consider other cultural perceptions of sexuality. Many minority and immigrant families may hold their own cultural and religious views of sexuality education that would lead them to stand against CSE. If this resistance is ignored, it sets CSE up for failure, which in turn will most negatively impact students of color and LGBTQIA+ students. This failure would directly contribute to white supremacist patriarchal ideals dominating American culture. In the end, this thesis aims to point to ways that CSE can be set up for success and meet the wide needs of youth and community stakeholders.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/5266"],"dc:subject":["American Politics","Curriculum and Social Inquiry","Developmental Psychology","Educational Methods","Educational Sociology","Education Policy","Family, Life Course, and Society","Gender and Sexuality","Health Policy","Politics and Social Change","Race and Ethnicity","Social Justice","Social Psychology","Social Psychology and Interaction","Sociology of Culture","Sociology of Religion","sexual education","white supremacy","patriarchy","LGBTQIA+","parental rights"],"dc:title":["Conservative and Cultural Clashes with Comprehensive Sexuality Education"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Liberal Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["Master"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts"],"thesis:institution_name":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:58:39Z"}