{"id":{"repo_id":"cuny-grad","oai_identifier":"oai:academicworks.cuny.edu:gc_etds-6076"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cuny-grad/oai:academicworks.cuny.edu:gc_etds-6076","repository":{"repo_id":"cuny-grad","name":"City University of New York - Graduate Center","base_url":"https://academicworks.cuny.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"White Blinders: A Study of Race Relations Theory in Britain, 1948–1988","abstract":"<p>This dissertation studies the early generation of scholars who developed the academic field of race relations in Britain from the 1940s into the 1980s. The research and methodology performed throughout this period was both innovative and problematic due to the approaches taken. Early scholars, such as Kenneth L. Little, Michael Banton, Sheila Patterson, and John Rex, provided the dominant schools of thought in the study of race relations in Britain up to the early 1970s. This dissertation studies the origins and development of an interdisciplinary field of study within the context of a nation and society coming to grips with changing demographics.</p> <p>The early development of the field of British race relations was dominated by white scholars who subordinated race to other factors. With the exception of Rex, these scholars approached British race relations by mapping their African methodology on British race relations, although the majority of Black British immigrants arrived from the West Indies and South Asia, not Africa. They approached their research as studies in intra-group relations, which diminished race as a primary factor. According to early social scientists, the problem was not that they were black, but that they were there; they located the problem within the black population’s inability to assimilate, as opposed to British society’s acceptance of them. Rex, who applied Marxist theory in an attempt to understand British race relations, subordinated race to class conflict. The field remained one sided where white Britons, in academia and the government, attempted to speak for and about a growing black population in Britain. It lacked black voices until the 1970s and 1980s through the work of Ambalavaner Sivanandan, Chris Mullard, Stuart Hall, and Paul Gilroy.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;This dissertation studies the early generation of scholars who developed the academic field of race relations in Britain from the 1940s into the 1980s. The research and methodology performed throughout this period was both innovative and problematic due to the approaches taken. Early scholars, such as Kenneth L. Little, Michael Banton, Sheila Patterson, and John Rex, provided the dominant schools of thought in the study of race relations in Britain up to the early 1970s. This dissertation studies the origins and development of an interdisciplinary field of study within the context of a nation and society coming to grips with changing demographics.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The early development of the field of British race relations was dominated by white scholars who subordinated race to other factors. With the exception of Rex, these scholars approached British race relations by mapping their African methodology on British race relations, although the majority of Black British immigrants arrived from the West Indies and South Asia, not Africa. They approached their research as studies in intra-group relations, which diminished race as a primary factor. According to early social scientists, the problem was not that they were black, but that they were there; they located the problem within the black population’s inability to assimilate, as opposed to British society’s acceptance of them. Rex, who applied Marxist theory in an attempt to understand British race relations, subordinated race to class conflict. The field remained one sided where white Britons, in academia and the government, attempted to speak for and about a growing black population in Britain. It lacked black voices until the 1970s and 1980s through the work of Ambalavaner Sivanandan, Chris Mullard, Stuart Hall, and Paul Gilroy.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Sherman, Matthew T"],"institution":"The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":"History","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Timothy Alborn"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Simon Davis","Clifford Rosenberg","Brett Bebber"],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022-09-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2022-09-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:00:26Z","subjects":["European History","History","Intellectual History","Institute of Race Relations","Kenneth Little","Michael Banton","Sheila Patterson","John Rex"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4987","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Timothy Alborn"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Simon Davis","Clifford Rosenberg","Brett Bebber"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Sherman, Matthew T"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2023-03-30T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["History"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["European History","History","Intellectual History","Institute of Race Relations","Kenneth Little","Michael Banton","Sheila Patterson","John Rex"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4987"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>This dissertation studies the early generation of scholars who developed the academic field of race relations in Britain from the 1940s into the 1980s. The research and methodology performed throughout this period was both innovative and problematic due to the approaches taken. Early scholars, such as Kenneth L. Little, Michael Banton, Sheila Patterson, and John Rex, provided the dominant schools of thought in the study of race relations in Britain up to the early 1970s. This dissertation studies the origins and development of an interdisciplinary field of study within the context of a nation and society coming to grips with changing demographics.</p> <p>The early development of the field of British race relations was dominated by white scholars who subordinated race to other factors. With the exception of Rex, these scholars approached British race relations by mapping their African methodology on British race relations, although the majority of Black British immigrants arrived from the West Indies and South Asia, not Africa. They approached their research as studies in intra-group relations, which diminished race as a primary factor. According to early social scientists, the problem was not that they were black, but that they were there; they located the problem within the black population’s inability to assimilate, as opposed to British society’s acceptance of them. Rex, who applied Marxist theory in an attempt to understand British race relations, subordinated race to class conflict. The field remained one sided where white Britons, in academia and the government, attempted to speak for and about a growing black population in Britain. It lacked black voices until the 1970s and 1980s through the work of Ambalavaner Sivanandan, Chris Mullard, Stuart Hall, and Paul Gilroy.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["White Blinders: A Study of Race Relations Theory in Britain, 1948–1988"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Timothy Alborn"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Simon Davis","Clifford Rosenberg","Brett Bebber"],"dc:creator":["Sherman, Matthew T"],"dc:date.available":["2023-03-30T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>This dissertation studies the early generation of scholars who developed the academic field of race relations in Britain from the 1940s into the 1980s. The research and methodology performed throughout this period was both innovative and problematic due to the approaches taken. Early scholars, such as Kenneth L. Little, Michael Banton, Sheila Patterson, and John Rex, provided the dominant schools of thought in the study of race relations in Britain up to the early 1970s. This dissertation studies the origins and development of an interdisciplinary field of study within the context of a nation and society coming to grips with changing demographics.</p> <p>The early development of the field of British race relations was dominated by white scholars who subordinated race to other factors. With the exception of Rex, these scholars approached British race relations by mapping their African methodology on British race relations, although the majority of Black British immigrants arrived from the West Indies and South Asia, not Africa. They approached their research as studies in intra-group relations, which diminished race as a primary factor. According to early social scientists, the problem was not that they were black, but that they were there; they located the problem within the black population’s inability to assimilate, as opposed to British society’s acceptance of them. Rex, who applied Marxist theory in an attempt to understand British race relations, subordinated race to class conflict. The field remained one sided where white Britons, in academia and the government, attempted to speak for and about a growing black population in Britain. It lacked black voices until the 1970s and 1980s through the work of Ambalavaner Sivanandan, Chris Mullard, Stuart Hall, and Paul Gilroy.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4987"],"dc:subject":["European History","History","Intellectual History","Institute of Race Relations","Kenneth Little","Michael Banton","Sheila Patterson","John Rex"],"dc:title":["White Blinders: A Study of Race Relations Theory in Britain, 1948–1988"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["History"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"thesis:institution_name":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:00:26Z"}