{"id":{"repo_id":"cuny-grad","oai_identifier":"oai:academicworks.cuny.edu:gc_etds-5059"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cuny-grad/oai:academicworks.cuny.edu:gc_etds-5059","repository":{"repo_id":"cuny-grad","name":"City University of New York - Graduate Center","base_url":"https://academicworks.cuny.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Doing Discipline Different: Evaluating the Implementation of Restorative Justice as An Alternative to Punitive Discipline in New York City Public Schools","abstract":"<p>Given that punitive discipline practices have disproportionately impacted its poor students of color, New York City is committed to transforming school discipline and improving school climate by implementing restorative justice as an alternative. This study is an evaluation of the restorative justice pilot program funded by the New York City Council and managed by the New York City Department of Education where key stakeholders including officials at the Department of Education, school administrators, educators, school staff, and community organizations are involved in the implementation of restorative justice in schools with high suspension rates. Data was collected through interviews, observations of sites involved in the program, and review of relevant documents and information. Organizational change is complex, and this study offered participants an invitation to share the accomplishments and challenges experienced throughout the shift away from punitive exclusionary practices to more restorative approaches. Key stakeholders share what has worked and what has not in their efforts to improve school climate, culture, and discipline by implementing more holistic, student-centered restorative practices. In this dissertation, I argue specifically that simply focusing on restorative rhetoric and practices without looking at the inherent biases and power dynamics that exist in schools serving poor students of color will not work. The information presented here can be helpful for those interested in moving away from punitive, exclusionary discipline toward restorative practices that focus on building community and resolving conflict in inclusive, peaceful, and healing ways. Furthermore, this study adds to the existing body of literature on the use of restorative justice in schools.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Given that punitive discipline practices have disproportionately impacted its poor students of color, New York City is committed to transforming school discipline and improving school climate by implementing restorative justice as an alternative. This study is an evaluation of the restorative justice pilot program funded by the New York City Council and managed by the New York City Department of Education where key stakeholders including officials at the Department of Education, school administrators, educators, school staff, and community organizations are involved in the implementation of restorative justice in schools with high suspension rates. Data was collected through interviews, observations of sites involved in the program, and review of relevant documents and information. Organizational change is complex, and this study offered participants an invitation to share the accomplishments and challenges experienced throughout the shift away from punitive exclusionary practices to more restorative approaches. Key stakeholders share what has worked and what has not in their efforts to improve school climate, culture, and discipline by implementing more holistic, student-centered restorative practices. In this dissertation, I argue specifically that simply focusing on restorative rhetoric and practices without looking at the inherent biases and power dynamics that exist in schools serving poor students of color will not work. The information presented here can be helpful for those interested in moving away from punitive, exclusionary discipline toward restorative practices that focus on building community and resolving conflict in inclusive, peaceful, and healing ways. Furthermore, this study adds to the existing body of literature on the use of restorative justice in schools.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Diaz-Mendoza, Virginia"],"institution":"The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":"Criminal Justice","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Richard E. Ocejo"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Teresa A. Booker","Roddrick Colvin","David Fletcher"],"year":2020,"date_issued":"2020-09-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2020-09-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:58:22Z","subjects":["Education","Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research","Social and Behavioral Sciences","school climate","restorative practice","zero tolerance","implementation","evaluation"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4000","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Richard E. Ocejo"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Teresa A. Booker","Roddrick Colvin","David Fletcher"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Diaz-Mendoza, Virginia"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2020-08-30T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Criminal Justice"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Education","Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research","Social and Behavioral Sciences","school climate","restorative practice","zero tolerance","implementation","evaluation"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4000"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Given that punitive discipline practices have disproportionately impacted its poor students of color, New York City is committed to transforming school discipline and improving school climate by implementing restorative justice as an alternative. This study is an evaluation of the restorative justice pilot program funded by the New York City Council and managed by the New York City Department of Education where key stakeholders including officials at the Department of Education, school administrators, educators, school staff, and community organizations are involved in the implementation of restorative justice in schools with high suspension rates. Data was collected through interviews, observations of sites involved in the program, and review of relevant documents and information. Organizational change is complex, and this study offered participants an invitation to share the accomplishments and challenges experienced throughout the shift away from punitive exclusionary practices to more restorative approaches. Key stakeholders share what has worked and what has not in their efforts to improve school climate, culture, and discipline by implementing more holistic, student-centered restorative practices. In this dissertation, I argue specifically that simply focusing on restorative rhetoric and practices without looking at the inherent biases and power dynamics that exist in schools serving poor students of color will not work. The information presented here can be helpful for those interested in moving away from punitive, exclusionary discipline toward restorative practices that focus on building community and resolving conflict in inclusive, peaceful, and healing ways. Furthermore, this study adds to the existing body of literature on the use of restorative justice in schools.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Doing Discipline Different: Evaluating the Implementation of Restorative Justice as An Alternative to Punitive Discipline in New York City Public Schools"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Richard E. Ocejo"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Teresa A. Booker","Roddrick Colvin","David Fletcher"],"dc:creator":["Diaz-Mendoza, Virginia"],"dc:date.available":["2020-08-30T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Given that punitive discipline practices have disproportionately impacted its poor students of color, New York City is committed to transforming school discipline and improving school climate by implementing restorative justice as an alternative. This study is an evaluation of the restorative justice pilot program funded by the New York City Council and managed by the New York City Department of Education where key stakeholders including officials at the Department of Education, school administrators, educators, school staff, and community organizations are involved in the implementation of restorative justice in schools with high suspension rates. Data was collected through interviews, observations of sites involved in the program, and review of relevant documents and information. Organizational change is complex, and this study offered participants an invitation to share the accomplishments and challenges experienced throughout the shift away from punitive exclusionary practices to more restorative approaches. Key stakeholders share what has worked and what has not in their efforts to improve school climate, culture, and discipline by implementing more holistic, student-centered restorative practices. In this dissertation, I argue specifically that simply focusing on restorative rhetoric and practices without looking at the inherent biases and power dynamics that exist in schools serving poor students of color will not work. The information presented here can be helpful for those interested in moving away from punitive, exclusionary discipline toward restorative practices that focus on building community and resolving conflict in inclusive, peaceful, and healing ways. Furthermore, this study adds to the existing body of literature on the use of restorative justice in schools.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4000"],"dc:subject":["Education","Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research","Social and Behavioral Sciences","school climate","restorative practice","zero tolerance","implementation","evaluation"],"dc:title":["Doing Discipline Different: Evaluating the Implementation of Restorative Justice as An Alternative to Punitive Discipline in New York City Public Schools"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Criminal Justice"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"thesis:institution_name":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:58:22Z"}