Back to results

The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York

Support vs. Steady Airflow: The Effect of Two Different Instructions on Subglottal Pressure, Sound Pressure Level, and Airflow Rate during Singing and Speaking

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

<p>This empirical study investigated the possibility of finding an alternative to a conventional directive in vocal pedagogy. There is a debate among voice pedagogues and voice scientists with regard to how to teach breath management, particularly about the concept of support. W. Stephen Smith has strongly objected to the use of the term “support.” He suggests that the word promotes the use of increased air pressure. The purpose of the present investigation was to test that hypothesis by examining differences in a variety of physiological parameters, comparing a conventional singing instruction that uses the word “support” with an alternative instruction that integrates Smith’s concept, constant flow of air.</p> <p>The parameters (subglottal pressure, sound pressure level, and airflow rate) were obtained by using the KayPENTAX Phonatory Aerodynamic System. Three instructions were given in randomized order to 49 participants: (A) Sing the way you usually sing (baseline); (B) Allow your breath to flow steadily with the clear [ɑ] vowels; and (C) Keep the tone well supported with the clear [ɑ] vowels. The singing material consisted of seven intonations of the syllable [pɑ] to the tune of “Somewhere over the Rainbow.” The participants filled out a questionnaire inquiring as to how they applied instructions (B) and (C) to their singing.</p> <p>The results revealed significant differences in both subglottal pressure (<em>p</em> = 0.002) and sound pressure level (<em>p</em> = 0.035) between instructions (B) and (C) in the singing task: subglottal pressure and sound pressure level showed a lower mean for instruction (B) than for instruction (C). The statistical results and the participants’ written responses related to instruction (B) (e.g., “<em>legato</em>,” “free,” “naturally,” “easier”) suggest that the use of instruction (B) can facilitate students’ efficient singing without additional strain.</p>

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Doctor of Musical Arts
Level thesis:degree_level
Doctoral
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
Music
Grantor
The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York
Year dc:date.available
2019

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Kim, Sunyoung
Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
  • Norman Carey
Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember
  • Claudia Friedlander
  • David Rindskopf
  • L. Poundie Burstein

Subjects

dc:subject × 9

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3499
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:academicworks.cuny.edu:gc_etds-4437

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
City University of New York - Graduate Center
Base URL
academicworks.cuny.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Kim, Sunyoung. Support vs. Steady Airflow: The Effect of Two Different Instructions on Subglottal Pressure, Sound Pressure Level, and Airflow Rate during Singing and Speaking. Doctoral thesis, The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York, 2019. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3499