Although it is very typical for consumers to be exposed to multiple instances of negative publicity about a brand, existing research has focused on consumers’ reactions to one-time negative publicity instances. Given the important role of self-brand connection in consumers’ reactions to negative brand-related information, the current study investigates how consumers with different self-brand connection levels react to multiple instances of negative publicity in a single domain versus across different domains. Specifically, I suggest that consumers with high self-brand connection might be defense motivated, which in return, might result in justification of one-time instances unless consistency in behavior is signaled. Therefore, consumers with high self-brand connection might have lower brand evaluations after being exposed to multiple instances of negative publicity in the same domain versus across different domains. On the other hand, consumers with low self-brand connection might be accuracy motivated and perceive negative brand-related information very diagnostic. Thus, these consumers might readily attribute responsibility to the brand after a one-time negative publicity instance, and repeated publicity instances in the same domain might have less informational value. Since each different publicity instance would have an incremental effect in their brand evaluations, consumers with low self-brand connection might have lower brand evaluations after exposure to multiple instances of negative publicity across different domains versus in the same domain.
","abstract_html":"<p>Although it is very typical for consumers to be exposed to multiple instances of negative publicity about a brand, existing research has focused on consumers’ reactions to one-time negative publicity instances. Given the important role of self-brand connection in consumers’ reactions to negative brand-related information, the current study investigates how consumers with different self-brand connection levels react to multiple instances of negative publicity in a single domain versus across different domains. Specifically, I suggest that consumers with high self-brand connection might be defense motivated, which in return, might result in justification of one-time instances unless consistency in behavior is signaled. Therefore, consumers with high self-brand connection might have lower brand evaluations after being exposed to multiple instances of negative publicity in the same domain versus across different domains. On the other hand, consumers with low self-brand connection might be accuracy motivated and perceive negative brand-related information very diagnostic. Thus, these consumers might readily attribute responsibility to the brand after a one-time negative publicity instance, and repeated publicity instances in the same domain might have less informational value. Since each different publicity instance would have an incremental effect in their brand evaluations, consumers with low self-brand connection might have lower brand evaluations after exposure to multiple instances of negative publicity across different domains versus in the same domain. </p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Basar, Berna"],"institution":"The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":"Business","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Sankar Sen"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Karl Lang","Pragya Mathur"],"year":2019,"date_issued":"2019-05-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2019-05-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:58:57Z","subjects":["Business","Business and Corporate Communications","Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics","Marketing","Brand Reputation","Morality","Transgressions","Corporate Social Responsibility"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3216","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Sankar Sen"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Karl Lang","Pragya Mathur"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Basar, Berna"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2019-04-23T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Business"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Business","Business and Corporate Communications","Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics","Marketing","Brand Reputation","Morality","Transgressions","Corporate Social Responsibility"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3216"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Although it is very typical for consumers to be exposed to multiple instances of negative publicity about a brand, existing research has focused on consumers’ reactions to one-time negative publicity instances. Given the important role of self-brand connection in consumers’ reactions to negative brand-related information, the current study investigates how consumers with different self-brand connection levels react to multiple instances of negative publicity in a single domain versus across different domains. Specifically, I suggest that consumers with high self-brand connection might be defense motivated, which in return, might result in justification of one-time instances unless consistency in behavior is signaled. Therefore, consumers with high self-brand connection might have lower brand evaluations after being exposed to multiple instances of negative publicity in the same domain versus across different domains. On the other hand, consumers with low self-brand connection might be accuracy motivated and perceive negative brand-related information very diagnostic. Thus, these consumers might readily attribute responsibility to the brand after a one-time negative publicity instance, and repeated publicity instances in the same domain might have less informational value. Since each different publicity instance would have an incremental effect in their brand evaluations, consumers with low self-brand connection might have lower brand evaluations after exposure to multiple instances of negative publicity across different domains versus in the same domain.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Consumers’ Reactions to Multiple Instances of Negative Publicity: The Role of Publicity Domain Similarity"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Sankar Sen"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Karl Lang","Pragya Mathur"],"dc:creator":["Basar, Berna"],"dc:date.available":["2019-04-23T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Although it is very typical for consumers to be exposed to multiple instances of negative publicity about a brand, existing research has focused on consumers’ reactions to one-time negative publicity instances. Given the important role of self-brand connection in consumers’ reactions to negative brand-related information, the current study investigates how consumers with different self-brand connection levels react to multiple instances of negative publicity in a single domain versus across different domains. Specifically, I suggest that consumers with high self-brand connection might be defense motivated, which in return, might result in justification of one-time instances unless consistency in behavior is signaled. Therefore, consumers with high self-brand connection might have lower brand evaluations after being exposed to multiple instances of negative publicity in the same domain versus across different domains. On the other hand, consumers with low self-brand connection might be accuracy motivated and perceive negative brand-related information very diagnostic. Thus, these consumers might readily attribute responsibility to the brand after a one-time negative publicity instance, and repeated publicity instances in the same domain might have less informational value. Since each different publicity instance would have an incremental effect in their brand evaluations, consumers with low self-brand connection might have lower brand evaluations after exposure to multiple instances of negative publicity across different domains versus in the same domain.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3216"],"dc:subject":["Business","Business and Corporate Communications","Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics","Marketing","Brand Reputation","Morality","Transgressions","Corporate Social Responsibility"],"dc:title":["Consumers’ Reactions to Multiple Instances of Negative Publicity: The Role of Publicity Domain Similarity"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Business"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"thesis:institution_name":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:58:57Z"}