Feminist accounts of how “the personal” is used in feminist critical nonfiction have theorized that the effect of the personal is to connect the writer with readers who share a sense of her investment in the subject matter. Looking at two recent, prominent works about gender and sexuality, and race, respectively that combine genres of criticism and narrative memoir – Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts and Ta-Nehisi Coates’s Between the World and Me – this paper considers how personal writing is shaped not by readers it wants to connect to, but by anxious, even dreadful, anticipation of being read by its most resistant and vitriolic readers. I argue that Nelson’s and Coates’s formally dexterous choices – particularly their respective decisions to address their narratives to second person intimates – have been shaped in response to their understandings of what I call the antagonistic reader, a reader whose cognitive and emotional resistance to the writer’s words poses a threat to the text.
","abstract_html":"<p>Feminist accounts of how “the personal” is used in feminist critical nonfiction have theorized that the effect of the personal is to connect the writer with readers who share a sense of her investment in the subject matter. Looking at two recent, prominent works about gender and sexuality, and race, respectively that combine genres of criticism and narrative memoir – Maggie Nelson’s <em>The Argonauts</em> and Ta-Nehisi Coates’s <em>Between the World and Me</em> – this paper considers how personal writing is shaped not by readers it wants to connect to, but by anxious, even dreadful, anticipation of being read by its most resistant and vitriolic readers. I argue that Nelson’s and Coates’s formally dexterous choices – particularly their respective decisions to address their narratives to second person intimates – have been shaped in response to their understandings of what I call the antagonistic reader, a reader whose cognitive and emotional resistance to the writer’s words poses a threat to the text.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Glaser, Dana"],"institution":"The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York","degree_name":"Master of Arts","degree_level":"Master","degree_discipline":"Women's and Gender Studies","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Nancy K. Miller"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2018,"date_issued":"2018-05-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2018-05-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:00:13Z","subjects":["English Language and Literature","Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","Maggie Nelson","Ta-Nehisi Coates","critical memoir","personal","feminist","second-person"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2594","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Nancy K. Miller"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Glaser, Dana"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2020-05-30T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Women's and Gender Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Master"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["English Language and Literature","Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","Maggie Nelson","Ta-Nehisi Coates","critical memoir","personal","feminist","second-person"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2594"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Feminist accounts of how “the personal” is used in feminist critical nonfiction have theorized that the effect of the personal is to connect the writer with readers who share a sense of her investment in the subject matter. Looking at two recent, prominent works about gender and sexuality, and race, respectively that combine genres of criticism and narrative memoir – Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts and Ta-Nehisi Coates’s Between the World and Me – this paper considers how personal writing is shaped not by readers it wants to connect to, but by anxious, even dreadful, anticipation of being read by its most resistant and vitriolic readers. I argue that Nelson’s and Coates’s formally dexterous choices – particularly their respective decisions to address their narratives to second person intimates – have been shaped in response to their understandings of what I call the antagonistic reader, a reader whose cognitive and emotional resistance to the writer’s words poses a threat to the text.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Who Is It For? Personal Writing and Antagonistic Readers"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Nancy K. Miller"],"dc:creator":["Glaser, Dana"],"dc:date.available":["2020-05-30T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Feminist accounts of how “the personal” is used in feminist critical nonfiction have theorized that the effect of the personal is to connect the writer with readers who share a sense of her investment in the subject matter. Looking at two recent, prominent works about gender and sexuality, and race, respectively that combine genres of criticism and narrative memoir – Maggie Nelson’s The Argonauts and Ta-Nehisi Coates’s Between the World and Me – this paper considers how personal writing is shaped not by readers it wants to connect to, but by anxious, even dreadful, anticipation of being read by its most resistant and vitriolic readers. I argue that Nelson’s and Coates’s formally dexterous choices – particularly their respective decisions to address their narratives to second person intimates – have been shaped in response to their understandings of what I call the antagonistic reader, a reader whose cognitive and emotional resistance to the writer’s words poses a threat to the text.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2594"],"dc:subject":["English Language and Literature","Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","Maggie Nelson","Ta-Nehisi Coates","critical memoir","personal","feminist","second-person"],"dc:title":["Who Is It For? Personal Writing and Antagonistic Readers"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Women's and Gender Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["Master"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts"],"thesis:institution_name":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T02:00:13Z"}