This thesis focuses on how same sex couples within the United States claim specific parenting rights and to what extent can law promote social change. Since certain beliefs, values, and behaviors are accepted by some cultural groups or organizations in a society, many same sex couples believe that they should obtain an equal amount of legal entitlement instead of being limited or restricted from certain rights. The theoretical approach incorporates the concepts of legal consciousness and the importance of legal recognition. Legal consciousness is a form of legal awareness and empowerment of people involving issues in regards to the law. The concept additionally focuses on whether or not people interact with the law and decide if they wish to either engage or even disengage themselves in certain practices. By integrating the exploration of social movements, I then include examples of how such movements seek to rely on litigation and are formed in order to shift public opinion and policies that are in favor of same-sex couples parenting rights. Next, I indicate in what ways social movements can promote economic, legal, and social change for same sex couples since individuals have the ability to share and reflect their ideas about the law through several organizations and legal practices. Last, I incorporate the DeBoer v. Snyder case and describe how Michigan’s ban on same-sex marriage was overturned, allowing same-sex couples to legally parent and jointly adopt children. My conclusion explains ways in which social change, acceptance, and legal recognition can occur for same-sex couples who fight for specific parenting rights.
","abstract_html":"<p>This thesis focuses on how same sex couples within the United States claim specific parenting rights and to what extent can law promote social change. Since certain beliefs, values, and behaviors are accepted by some cultural groups or organizations in a society, many same sex couples believe that they should obtain an equal amount of legal entitlement instead of being limited or restricted from certain rights. The theoretical approach incorporates the concepts of legal consciousness and the importance of legal recognition. Legal consciousness is a form of legal awareness and empowerment of people involving issues in regards to the law. The concept additionally focuses on whether or not people interact with the law and decide if they wish to either engage or even disengage themselves in certain practices. By integrating the exploration of social movements, I then include examples of how such movements seek to rely on litigation and are formed in order to shift public opinion and policies that are in favor of same-sex couples parenting rights. Next, I indicate in what ways social movements can promote economic, legal, and social change for same sex couples since individuals have the ability to share and reflect their ideas about the law through several organizations and legal practices. Last, I incorporate the DeBoer v. Snyder case and describe how Michigan’s ban on same-sex marriage was overturned, allowing same-sex couples to legally parent and jointly adopt children. My conclusion explains ways in which social change, acceptance, and legal recognition can occur for same-sex couples who fight for specific parenting rights.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Tresil, Nancy"],"institution":"The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York","degree_name":"Master of Arts","degree_level":"Master","degree_discipline":"Liberal Studies","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Monica Varsanyi"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-09-01T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2017-09-01T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:58:39Z","subjects":["Law","LGBT","same-sex parenting","same-sex marriage","legal consciousness","legal recognition","social movements"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2426","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Monica Varsanyi"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Tresil, Nancy"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2017-09-18T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Liberal Studies"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Master"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Master of Arts"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Law","LGBT","same-sex parenting","same-sex marriage","legal consciousness","legal recognition","social movements"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2426"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This thesis focuses on how same sex couples within the United States claim specific parenting rights and to what extent can law promote social change. Since certain beliefs, values, and behaviors are accepted by some cultural groups or organizations in a society, many same sex couples believe that they should obtain an equal amount of legal entitlement instead of being limited or restricted from certain rights. The theoretical approach incorporates the concepts of legal consciousness and the importance of legal recognition. Legal consciousness is a form of legal awareness and empowerment of people involving issues in regards to the law. The concept additionally focuses on whether or not people interact with the law and decide if they wish to either engage or even disengage themselves in certain practices. By integrating the exploration of social movements, I then include examples of how such movements seek to rely on litigation and are formed in order to shift public opinion and policies that are in favor of same-sex couples parenting rights. Next, I indicate in what ways social movements can promote economic, legal, and social change for same sex couples since individuals have the ability to share and reflect their ideas about the law through several organizations and legal practices. Last, I incorporate the DeBoer v. Snyder case and describe how Michigan’s ban on same-sex marriage was overturned, allowing same-sex couples to legally parent and jointly adopt children. My conclusion explains ways in which social change, acceptance, and legal recognition can occur for same-sex couples who fight for specific parenting rights.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Fight for Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Parenting Rights in The United States"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Monica Varsanyi"],"dc:creator":["Tresil, Nancy"],"dc:date.available":["2017-09-18T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This thesis focuses on how same sex couples within the United States claim specific parenting rights and to what extent can law promote social change. Since certain beliefs, values, and behaviors are accepted by some cultural groups or organizations in a society, many same sex couples believe that they should obtain an equal amount of legal entitlement instead of being limited or restricted from certain rights. The theoretical approach incorporates the concepts of legal consciousness and the importance of legal recognition. Legal consciousness is a form of legal awareness and empowerment of people involving issues in regards to the law. The concept additionally focuses on whether or not people interact with the law and decide if they wish to either engage or even disengage themselves in certain practices. By integrating the exploration of social movements, I then include examples of how such movements seek to rely on litigation and are formed in order to shift public opinion and policies that are in favor of same-sex couples parenting rights. Next, I indicate in what ways social movements can promote economic, legal, and social change for same sex couples since individuals have the ability to share and reflect their ideas about the law through several organizations and legal practices. Last, I incorporate the DeBoer v. Snyder case and describe how Michigan’s ban on same-sex marriage was overturned, allowing same-sex couples to legally parent and jointly adopt children. My conclusion explains ways in which social change, acceptance, and legal recognition can occur for same-sex couples who fight for specific parenting rights.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2426"],"dc:subject":["Law","LGBT","same-sex parenting","same-sex marriage","legal consciousness","legal recognition","social movements"],"dc:title":["The Fight for Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Parenting Rights in The United States"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Liberal Studies"],"thesis:degree_level":["Master"],"thesis:degree_name":["Master of Arts"],"thesis:institution_name":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:58:39Z"}