This project examined the two main questions of why and when behaviors change. In the course of five studies, four aims were addressed. The first aim examined why behaviors change by examining whether the behavioral subtypes of control, sex, and violence could differentiate offenses within the elements of a crime (e.g. the offender, victim, and situation. The second aim addressed when behaviors change by examining whether the behavioral subtypes of control, sex, and violence could differentiate offenses within the temporal phases of a crime (e.g. before, during, and after the crime). The third aim examined which behaviors to use as the basis of the proposed three ways to examine behavioral consistency. Finally, the fourth and last aim was to use behavioral trajectories to explore patterns of (e.g. when) and possible explanations for (e.g. why) behavioral change. Multiple techniques of multidimensional scaling as well as behavioral trajectories were used. Results show that while the behavioral subtypes of control, sex, and violence were unable to differentiate between offenses as hypothesized, there were other thematic structures that were shown to do so. Patterns of both behavioral consistency and predictable change were found using behavioral trajectories, and potential behavioral co-occurrences to explain those changes were also determined.
","abstract_html":"<p>This project examined the two main questions of why and when behaviors change. In the course of five studies, four aims were addressed. The first aim examined why behaviors change by examining whether the behavioral subtypes of control, sex, and violence could differentiate offenses within the elements of a crime (e.g. the offender, victim, and situation. The second aim addressed when behaviors change by examining whether the behavioral subtypes of control, sex, and violence could differentiate offenses within the temporal phases of a crime (e.g. before, during, and after the crime). The third aim examined which behaviors to use as the basis of the proposed three ways to examine behavioral consistency. Finally, the fourth and last aim was to use behavioral trajectories to explore patterns of (e.g. when) and possible explanations for (e.g. why) behavioral change. Multiple techniques of multidimensional scaling as well as behavioral trajectories were used. Results show that while the behavioral subtypes of control, sex, and violence were unable to differentiate between offenses as hypothesized, there were other thematic structures that were shown to do so. Patterns of both behavioral consistency and predictable change were found using behavioral trajectories, and potential behavioral co-occurrences to explain those changes were also determined.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Schanz, Kimberley R"],"institution":"The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":"Psychology","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["C. Gabrielle Salfati"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Saul Kassin","Cathy S. Widom","Christopher Kunkle"],"year":2017,"date_issued":"2017-09-30T07:00:00Z","date_published":"2017-09-30T07:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:59:05Z","subjects":["Other Psychology","Behavioral consistency","Offender profiling","Time"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2193","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["C. Gabrielle Salfati"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Saul Kassin","Cathy S. Widom","Christopher Kunkle"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Schanz, Kimberley R"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2017-06-19T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Psychology"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Other Psychology","Behavioral consistency","Offender profiling","Time"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2193"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["This project examined the two main questions of why and when behaviors change. In the course of five studies, four aims were addressed. The first aim examined why behaviors change by examining whether the behavioral subtypes of control, sex, and violence could differentiate offenses within the elements of a crime (e.g. the offender, victim, and situation. The second aim addressed when behaviors change by examining whether the behavioral subtypes of control, sex, and violence could differentiate offenses within the temporal phases of a crime (e.g. before, during, and after the crime). The third aim examined which behaviors to use as the basis of the proposed three ways to examine behavioral consistency. Finally, the fourth and last aim was to use behavioral trajectories to explore patterns of (e.g. when) and possible explanations for (e.g. why) behavioral change. Multiple techniques of multidimensional scaling as well as behavioral trajectories were used. Results show that while the behavioral subtypes of control, sex, and violence were unable to differentiate between offenses as hypothesized, there were other thematic structures that were shown to do so. Patterns of both behavioral consistency and predictable change were found using behavioral trajectories, and potential behavioral co-occurrences to explain those changes were also determined.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Conceptualization of a Crime Event as a Process to Analyze Crime Commission and Behavioral Consistency in Serial Sexual Assaults"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["C. Gabrielle Salfati"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Saul Kassin","Cathy S. Widom","Christopher Kunkle"],"dc:creator":["Schanz, Kimberley R"],"dc:date.available":["2017-06-19T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["This project examined the two main questions of why and when behaviors change. In the course of five studies, four aims were addressed. The first aim examined why behaviors change by examining whether the behavioral subtypes of control, sex, and violence could differentiate offenses within the elements of a crime (e.g. the offender, victim, and situation. The second aim addressed when behaviors change by examining whether the behavioral subtypes of control, sex, and violence could differentiate offenses within the temporal phases of a crime (e.g. before, during, and after the crime). The third aim examined which behaviors to use as the basis of the proposed three ways to examine behavioral consistency. Finally, the fourth and last aim was to use behavioral trajectories to explore patterns of (e.g. when) and possible explanations for (e.g. why) behavioral change. Multiple techniques of multidimensional scaling as well as behavioral trajectories were used. Results show that while the behavioral subtypes of control, sex, and violence were unable to differentiate between offenses as hypothesized, there were other thematic structures that were shown to do so. Patterns of both behavioral consistency and predictable change were found using behavioral trajectories, and potential behavioral co-occurrences to explain those changes were also determined.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2193"],"dc:subject":["Other Psychology","Behavioral consistency","Offender profiling","Time"],"dc:title":["The Conceptualization of a Crime Event as a Process to Analyze Crime Commission and Behavioral Consistency in Serial Sexual Assaults"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Psychology"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"thesis:institution_name":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:59:05Z"}