{"id":{"repo_id":"cuny-grad","oai_identifier":"oai:academicworks.cuny.edu:gc_etds-2665"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cuny-grad/oai:academicworks.cuny.edu:gc_etds-2665","repository":{"repo_id":"cuny-grad","name":"City University of New York - Graduate Center","base_url":"https://academicworks.cuny.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Synesthetic Landscapes in Harold Pinter’s Theatre: A Symbolist Legacy","abstract":"<p>In the light of recent interdisciplinary critical approaches to<em> landscape</em> and <em>space</em>, and adopting <em>phenomenological</em> methods of <em>sensory</em> analysis, this dissertation explores interconnected or <em>synesthetic</em> sensory \"scapes\" in contemporary British playwright Harold Pinter's theatre. By studying its dramatic landscapes and probing into their multi-sensory manifestations in line with <em>Symbolist theory and aesthetics</em>, I argue that Pinter's theatre articulates an <em>ecocritical</em> stance and a <em>micropolitical</em> critique.</p> <p>Chapter One explains the dissertation's theoretical framework (landscape theory, Symbolist theory, ecocriticism, phenomenology, and sensory analysis), while arguing for an ecophilosophical reading of Pinter's landscapes that engages not only with spatial patterns but also with the bodyscapes and psychic ecology of his characters. Chapter Two examines the theoretical/aesthetic Symbolist qualities of Pinter's dramaturgy. Chapter Three connects Pinter's sensory scapes to the theories of space and time developed by Henri Bergson, revealing how they are concerned with subjective time as it is <em>lived</em>, with the spatiotemporal circularity of past, present, and future (related to the <em>ouroboros</em> symbol), and with the way one can imaginatively re/create one's own self through life. Chapter Four discusses how Pinter's <em>apocalyptic</em> landscapes evoke the horror of the Holocaust, and denounce the tradition of oppression (or the structures of uncontrolled violence) that repeatedly produces new social and ecological catastrophes. Chapter Five draws upon feminist philosopher Luce Irigaray's concepts of sexual difference to demonstrate the negative <em>ecological</em> effects of a monological patriarchal system of moral values upon family and conjugal life, as expressed in Pinter's oppressive and abusive <em>homescapes</em>.</p> <p>Throughout this study I activate an interdisciplinary dialogue between Pinter's landscapes and those found in works by Symbolist (and Decadent) artists/thinkers (Mallarmé, Rilke, Briusov, Maeterlinck, Rachilde, Patricio, Yeats, Munch, Sacher-Masoch, and Kafka.). Adopting phenomenological views of subjectivity (suggested by Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Gaston Bachelard, and Stanton Garner, among others), I invoke Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's notion of micropolitics, as well as the latter's concept of a combined ecology--mental, social, and environmental--to discuss how a study of sensory scapes reveals the presence of ecophilosophical and political concerns all through Pinter's dramatic oeuvre.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;In the light of recent interdisciplinary critical approaches to&lt;em&gt; landscape&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;space&lt;/em&gt;, and adopting &lt;em&gt;phenomenological&lt;/em&gt; methods of &lt;em&gt;sensory&lt;/em&gt; analysis, this dissertation explores interconnected or &lt;em&gt;synesthetic&lt;/em&gt; sensory &quot;scapes&quot; in contemporary British playwright Harold Pinter&#x27;s theatre. By studying its dramatic landscapes and probing into their multi-sensory manifestations in line with &lt;em&gt;Symbolist theory and aesthetics&lt;/em&gt;, I argue that Pinter&#x27;s theatre articulates an &lt;em&gt;ecocritical&lt;/em&gt; stance and a &lt;em&gt;micropolitical&lt;/em&gt; critique.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Chapter One explains the dissertation&#x27;s theoretical framework (landscape theory, Symbolist theory, ecocriticism, phenomenology, and sensory analysis), while arguing for an ecophilosophical reading of Pinter&#x27;s landscapes that engages not only with spatial patterns but also with the bodyscapes and psychic ecology of his characters. Chapter Two examines the theoretical/aesthetic Symbolist qualities of Pinter&#x27;s dramaturgy. Chapter Three connects Pinter&#x27;s sensory scapes to the theories of space and time developed by Henri Bergson, revealing how they are concerned with subjective time as it is &lt;em&gt;lived&lt;/em&gt;, with the spatiotemporal circularity of past, present, and future (related to the &lt;em&gt;ouroboros&lt;/em&gt; symbol), and with the way one can imaginatively re/create one&#x27;s own self through life. Chapter Four discusses how Pinter&#x27;s &lt;em&gt;apocalyptic&lt;/em&gt; landscapes evoke the horror of the Holocaust, and denounce the tradition of oppression (or the structures of uncontrolled violence) that repeatedly produces new social and ecological catastrophes. Chapter Five draws upon feminist philosopher Luce Irigaray&#x27;s concepts of sexual difference to demonstrate the negative &lt;em&gt;ecological&lt;/em&gt; effects of a monological patriarchal system of moral values upon family and conjugal life, as expressed in Pinter&#x27;s oppressive and abusive &lt;em&gt;homescapes&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Throughout this study I activate an interdisciplinary dialogue between Pinter&#x27;s landscapes and those found in works by Symbolist (and Decadent) artists/thinkers (Mallarmé, Rilke, Briusov, Maeterlinck, Rachilde, Patricio, Yeats, Munch, Sacher-Masoch, and Kafka.). Adopting phenomenological views of subjectivity (suggested by Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Gaston Bachelard, and Stanton Garner, among others), I invoke Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari&#x27;s notion of micropolitics, as well as the latter&#x27;s concept of a combined ecology--mental, social, and environmental--to discuss how a study of sensory scapes reveals the presence of ecophilosophical and political concerns all through Pinter&#x27;s dramatic oeuvre.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Corrêa, Graça"],"institution":"The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":"Theatre","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Daniel Gerould"],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Mary Ann Caws","Daniel Gerould","Jean Graham-Jones"],"year":2010,"date_issued":"2010-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2010-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:58:22Z","subjects":["Theatre and Performance Studies"],"languages":[],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1645","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Daniel Gerould"]},{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Mary Ann Caws","Daniel Gerould","Jean Graham-Jones"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Corrêa, Graça"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2016-10-27T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Theatre"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Theatre and Performance Studies"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1645"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>In the light of recent interdisciplinary critical approaches to<em> landscape</em> and <em>space</em>, and adopting <em>phenomenological</em> methods of <em>sensory</em> analysis, this dissertation explores interconnected or <em>synesthetic</em> sensory \"scapes\" in contemporary British playwright Harold Pinter's theatre. By studying its dramatic landscapes and probing into their multi-sensory manifestations in line with <em>Symbolist theory and aesthetics</em>, I argue that Pinter's theatre articulates an <em>ecocritical</em> stance and a <em>micropolitical</em> critique.</p> <p>Chapter One explains the dissertation's theoretical framework (landscape theory, Symbolist theory, ecocriticism, phenomenology, and sensory analysis), while arguing for an ecophilosophical reading of Pinter's landscapes that engages not only with spatial patterns but also with the bodyscapes and psychic ecology of his characters. Chapter Two examines the theoretical/aesthetic Symbolist qualities of Pinter's dramaturgy. Chapter Three connects Pinter's sensory scapes to the theories of space and time developed by Henri Bergson, revealing how they are concerned with subjective time as it is <em>lived</em>, with the spatiotemporal circularity of past, present, and future (related to the <em>ouroboros</em> symbol), and with the way one can imaginatively re/create one's own self through life. Chapter Four discusses how Pinter's <em>apocalyptic</em> landscapes evoke the horror of the Holocaust, and denounce the tradition of oppression (or the structures of uncontrolled violence) that repeatedly produces new social and ecological catastrophes. Chapter Five draws upon feminist philosopher Luce Irigaray's concepts of sexual difference to demonstrate the negative <em>ecological</em> effects of a monological patriarchal system of moral values upon family and conjugal life, as expressed in Pinter's oppressive and abusive <em>homescapes</em>.</p> <p>Throughout this study I activate an interdisciplinary dialogue between Pinter's landscapes and those found in works by Symbolist (and Decadent) artists/thinkers (Mallarmé, Rilke, Briusov, Maeterlinck, Rachilde, Patricio, Yeats, Munch, Sacher-Masoch, and Kafka.). Adopting phenomenological views of subjectivity (suggested by Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Gaston Bachelard, and Stanton Garner, among others), I invoke Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's notion of micropolitics, as well as the latter's concept of a combined ecology--mental, social, and environmental--to discuss how a study of sensory scapes reveals the presence of ecophilosophical and political concerns all through Pinter's dramatic oeuvre.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Synesthetic Landscapes in Harold Pinter’s Theatre: A Symbolist Legacy"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Daniel Gerould"],"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Mary Ann Caws","Daniel Gerould","Jean Graham-Jones"],"dc:creator":["Corrêa, Graça"],"dc:date.available":["2016-10-27T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>In the light of recent interdisciplinary critical approaches to<em> landscape</em> and <em>space</em>, and adopting <em>phenomenological</em> methods of <em>sensory</em> analysis, this dissertation explores interconnected or <em>synesthetic</em> sensory \"scapes\" in contemporary British playwright Harold Pinter's theatre. By studying its dramatic landscapes and probing into their multi-sensory manifestations in line with <em>Symbolist theory and aesthetics</em>, I argue that Pinter's theatre articulates an <em>ecocritical</em> stance and a <em>micropolitical</em> critique.</p> <p>Chapter One explains the dissertation's theoretical framework (landscape theory, Symbolist theory, ecocriticism, phenomenology, and sensory analysis), while arguing for an ecophilosophical reading of Pinter's landscapes that engages not only with spatial patterns but also with the bodyscapes and psychic ecology of his characters. Chapter Two examines the theoretical/aesthetic Symbolist qualities of Pinter's dramaturgy. Chapter Three connects Pinter's sensory scapes to the theories of space and time developed by Henri Bergson, revealing how they are concerned with subjective time as it is <em>lived</em>, with the spatiotemporal circularity of past, present, and future (related to the <em>ouroboros</em> symbol), and with the way one can imaginatively re/create one's own self through life. Chapter Four discusses how Pinter's <em>apocalyptic</em> landscapes evoke the horror of the Holocaust, and denounce the tradition of oppression (or the structures of uncontrolled violence) that repeatedly produces new social and ecological catastrophes. Chapter Five draws upon feminist philosopher Luce Irigaray's concepts of sexual difference to demonstrate the negative <em>ecological</em> effects of a monological patriarchal system of moral values upon family and conjugal life, as expressed in Pinter's oppressive and abusive <em>homescapes</em>.</p> <p>Throughout this study I activate an interdisciplinary dialogue between Pinter's landscapes and those found in works by Symbolist (and Decadent) artists/thinkers (Mallarmé, Rilke, Briusov, Maeterlinck, Rachilde, Patricio, Yeats, Munch, Sacher-Masoch, and Kafka.). Adopting phenomenological views of subjectivity (suggested by Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Gaston Bachelard, and Stanton Garner, among others), I invoke Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's notion of micropolitics, as well as the latter's concept of a combined ecology--mental, social, and environmental--to discuss how a study of sensory scapes reveals the presence of ecophilosophical and political concerns all through Pinter's dramatic oeuvre.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1645"],"dc:subject":["Theatre and Performance Studies"],"dc:title":["Synesthetic Landscapes in Harold Pinter’s Theatre: A Symbolist Legacy"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Theatre"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"thesis:institution_name":["The Graduate School and University Center of The City University of New York"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:58:22Z"}