Back to results

CSUniversity San Bernardino - Retro

Assessment and collaborative writing: Conflict to complement

Abstract

dc:description.abstract

One of the fundamental problems facing writing instructors who use collaboration is that traditional assessment measures, such as in-class essay exams, undermine rather than support such writing activities that are rooted in social construction theory. While the use of collaboration in writing classrooms continues to grow, the field of assessment remains virtually silent about the compatibility of traditional assessment methods with collaborative writing tasks such as group work and peer review. This thesis discusses social construction and assessment theories, their relation to collaboration, and the current role of both in writing classrooms.

Degree

thesis:*
Name thesis:degree_name
Master of Arts in English Composition
Level thesis:degree_level
Thesis
Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
English
Year
1997

Author and committee

dc:creator, dc:contributor.*
Author dc:creator
  • Sullivan, John Michael

Subjects

dc:subject × 4

Identifiers

dc:identifier.*
Repository record dc:identifier
https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/1320
OAI identifier oai:identifier
oai:scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu:etd-project-2320

Chain of custody

source
Harvested from
CSUniversity San Bernardino - Retro
Base URL
scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/do/oai/
Last updated
2026-07-24
Source record
OAI-PMH GetRecord
citation

Sullivan, John Michael. Assessment and collaborative writing: Conflict to complement. Thesis thesis, 1997. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/1320