{"id":{"repo_id":"creighton","oai_identifier":"oai:cdr.creighton.edu:10504/92257"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/creighton/oai:cdr.creighton.edu:10504/92257","repository":{"repo_id":"creighton","name":"Creighton University","base_url":"https://cdr.creighton.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The Consistency in Character of Prince Hal and King Henry the Fifth","abstract":"\"The prince, who is the hero both of the comick and tragick part, is a young man of great abilities and violent passions, whose sentiments are right, though his actions are wrong ; whose virtues are obscured by- negligence, and whose understanding is dissipated by levity. In his idle hours he is rather loose than wicked; and when the occasion forces out his latent qualities, he is great without effort, and brave without tumult. The trifler is roused into a hero, and the hero again reposes in the trifler.\" |The most characteristic thing about Johnson's criticism is found in his methodical route to his conclusion regarding the character problem of Prince Hal. He left him in the play. He did not do what so many critics are inclined to do with Shakesperian characters, lift them out of the dramatic context and liquidate such incidentals as the story, the setting and the elements of the plot, and leave.these characters dangling without support in the misty realms of speculation. The roots of this method are buried in the understanding Johnson had of Shakespeare as a whole.","abstract_html":""The prince, who is the hero both of the comick and tragick part, is a young man of great abilities and violent passions, whose sentiments are right, though his actions are wrong ; whose virtues are obscured by- negligence, and whose understanding is dissipated by levity. In his idle hours he is rather loose than wicked; and when the occasion forces out his latent qualities, he is great without effort, and brave without tumult. The trifler is roused into a hero, and the hero again reposes in the trifler." |The most characteristic thing about Johnson's criticism is found in his methodical route to his conclusion regarding the character problem of Prince Hal. He left him in the play. He did not do what so many critics are inclined to do with Shakesperian characters, lift them out of the dramatic context and liquidate such incidentals as the story, the setting and the elements of the plot, and leave.these characters dangling without support in the misty realms of speculation. The roots of this method are buried in the understanding Johnson had of Shakespeare as a whole.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Ramey, Frances Kathleen"],"institution":"Creighton University","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Smith, Paul F. S.J."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1947,"date_issued":"1947","date_published":"1947","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:50:46Z","subjects":["Shakespeare"],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":["A non-exclusive distribution right is granted to Creighton University and to ProQuest following the publishing model selected above."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10504/92257","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Smith, Paul F. S.J."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Ramey, Frances Kathleen"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2016-10-20T16:00:02Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2016-10-20T16:00:02Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1947"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Creighton University"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Shakespeare"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["A non-exclusive distribution right is granted to Creighton University and to ProQuest following the publishing model selected above."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10504/92257"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["\"The prince, who is the hero both of the comick and tragick part, is a young man of great abilities and violent passions, whose sentiments are right, though his actions are wrong ; whose virtues are obscured by- negligence, and whose understanding is dissipated by levity. In his idle hours he is rather loose than wicked; and when the occasion forces out his latent qualities, he is great without effort, and brave without tumult. The trifler is roused into a hero, and the hero again reposes in the trifler.\" |The most characteristic thing about Johnson's criticism is found in his methodical route to his conclusion regarding the character problem of Prince Hal. He left him in the play. He did not do what so many critics are inclined to do with Shakesperian characters, lift them out of the dramatic context and liquidate such incidentals as the story, the setting and the elements of the plot, and leave.these characters dangling without support in the misty realms of speculation. The roots of this method are buried in the understanding Johnson had of Shakespeare as a whole."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Consistency in Character of Prince Hal and King Henry the Fifth"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Smith, Paul F. S.J."],"dc:creator":["Ramey, Frances Kathleen"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2016-10-20T16:00:02Z"],"dc:date.available":["2016-10-20T16:00:02Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1947"],"dc:description.abstract":["\"The prince, who is the hero both of the comick and tragick part, is a young man of great abilities and violent passions, whose sentiments are right, though his actions are wrong ; whose virtues are obscured by- negligence, and whose understanding is dissipated by levity. In his idle hours he is rather loose than wicked; and when the occasion forces out his latent qualities, he is great without effort, and brave without tumult. The trifler is roused into a hero, and the hero again reposes in the trifler.\" |The most characteristic thing about Johnson's criticism is found in his methodical route to his conclusion regarding the character problem of Prince Hal. He left him in the play. He did not do what so many critics are inclined to do with Shakesperian characters, lift them out of the dramatic context and liquidate such incidentals as the story, the setting and the elements of the plot, and leave.these characters dangling without support in the misty realms of speculation. The roots of this method are buried in the understanding Johnson had of Shakespeare as a whole."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10504/92257"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:publisher":["Creighton University"],"dc:rights":["A non-exclusive distribution right is granted to Creighton University and to ProQuest following the publishing model selected above."],"dc:subject":["Shakespeare"],"dc:title":["The Consistency in Character of Prince Hal and King Henry the Fifth"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:50:46Z"}