Abstract
dc:description.abstractIt is one of the greatest paradoxes in the history of English literature that a country most conservative should have had a poet of the revolution. And it is even more paradoxical to think that England, so thoroughly established in the conservatism of her nobility, should have had one of her aristocrats, a member of a noble house which was able to trace its lineage back to the days of the Norman Conquest, become the favorite poet of anarchy and rebellion and of men in revolt against the religious and the moral and the social standards of God and man.
Degree
thesis:*- Grantor dc:publisher
- Creighton University
- Year dc:date.issued
- 1936
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Bloomer, Louis A. S.J.
- Advisor dc:contributor.advisor
-
- Name Not Legible
Rights
dc:rights- Statement dc:rights
-
- A non-exclusive distribution right is granted to Creighton University and to ProQuest following the publishing model selected above.
- Language dc:language.iso
- en_US
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Handle dc:identifier.uri
- http://hdl.handle.net/10504/91891
- OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:cdr.creighton.edu:10504/91891