{"id":{"repo_id":"creighton","oai_identifier":"oai:cdr.creighton.edu:10504/111613"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/creighton/oai:cdr.creighton.edu:10504/111613","repository":{"repo_id":"creighton","name":"Creighton University","base_url":"https://cdr.creighton.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"William Makepeace Thackeray's Use of the Parenthesis","abstract":"If one agrees that a major premise of literary criticism is that the test of a literary work is Its ability to be universally accepted throughout the ages, then it would appear that the works of William Makepeace Thackeray have not risen to the test, for anyone who studies the nineteenth century novel is acutely aware of the shift in Thackeray*s popularity from the nineteenth to the twentieth century. Thackeray is viewed by the modern critic with dissatisfaction, and anyone who writes on Thackeray immediately finds himself on the defensive.","abstract_html":"If one agrees that a major premise of literary criticism is that the test of a literary work is Its ability to be universally accepted throughout the ages, then it would appear that the works of William Makepeace Thackeray have not risen to the test, for anyone who studies the nineteenth century novel is acutely aware of the shift in Thackeray*s popularity from the nineteenth to the twentieth century. Thackeray is viewed by the modern critic with dissatisfaction, and anyone who writes on Thackeray immediately finds himself on the defensive.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Wagoner, Mary Alice"],"institution":"Creighton University","degree_name":null,"degree_level":null,"degree_discipline":null,"degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":["Hubeuka, Lloyd J."],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":1966,"date_issued":"1966","date_published":"1966","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:52:13Z","subjects":[],"languages":["en_US"],"rights":["A non-exclusive distribution right is granted to Creighton University and to ProQuest following the publishing model selected above."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10504/111613","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.advisor","label":"Advisor","values":["Hubeuka, Lloyd J."]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Wagoner, Mary Alice"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2017-04-07T21:52:05Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2017-04-07T21:52:05Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["1966"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Creighton University"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Thesis"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en_US"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["A non-exclusive distribution right is granted to Creighton University and to ProQuest following the publishing model selected above."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10504/111613"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["If one agrees that a major premise of literary criticism is that the test of a literary work is Its ability to be universally accepted throughout the ages, then it would appear that the works of William Makepeace Thackeray have not risen to the test, for anyone who studies the nineteenth century novel is acutely aware of the shift in Thackeray*s popularity from the nineteenth to the twentieth century. Thackeray is viewed by the modern critic with dissatisfaction, and anyone who writes on Thackeray immediately finds himself on the defensive."]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["William Makepeace Thackeray's Use of the Parenthesis"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.advisor":["Hubeuka, Lloyd J."],"dc:creator":["Wagoner, Mary Alice"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2017-04-07T21:52:05Z"],"dc:date.available":["2017-04-07T21:52:05Z"],"dc:date.issued":["1966"],"dc:description.abstract":["If one agrees that a major premise of literary criticism is that the test of a literary work is Its ability to be universally accepted throughout the ages, then it would appear that the works of William Makepeace Thackeray have not risen to the test, for anyone who studies the nineteenth century novel is acutely aware of the shift in Thackeray*s popularity from the nineteenth to the twentieth century. Thackeray is viewed by the modern critic with dissatisfaction, and anyone who writes on Thackeray immediately finds himself on the defensive."],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10504/111613"],"dc:language.iso":["en_US"],"dc:publisher":["Creighton University"],"dc:rights":["A non-exclusive distribution right is granted to Creighton University and to ProQuest following the publishing model selected above."],"dc:title":["William Makepeace Thackeray's Use of the Parenthesis"],"dc:type":["Thesis"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:52:13Z"}