{"id":{"repo_id":"cornell","oai_identifier":"oai:ecommons.cornell.edu:1813/115757"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cornell/oai:ecommons.cornell.edu:1813/115757","repository":{"repo_id":"cornell","name":"Cornell University","base_url":"https://ecommons.cornell.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"Navigating the Complexities of Algorithmic Auditing: Challenges and Considerations","abstract":"The field of algorithmic auditing is witnessing remarkable growth in response to concerns around discrimination-related harms exhibited by AI systems. However, this expansion has brought ambiguity regarding the definition of \"audit\" and the scope of evaluations. Although algorithmic audits involve various activities, defining an effective audit can be complicated due to normative, technical, and resource limitations. Challenges abound, from the lack of standardized language to diverse auditor characteristics. Nevertheless, the need for holistic evaluation is imperative as the societal impacts of algorithms become more apparent. Bridging theory and practice, this dissertation seeks to provide insights into and considerations for the algorithmic auditing community. By drawing on the history of audit studies in the social sciences, confronting the challenges of performing an audit in practice, and investigating the broader auditing ecosystem, it explores questions around the purpose of an audit, methodologies and best practices, available resources, community growth, and accountability. By doing so, it aims to improve the efficacy of AI audits and accountability for AI systems.","abstract_html":"The field of algorithmic auditing is witnessing remarkable growth in response to concerns around discrimination-related harms exhibited by AI systems. However, this expansion has brought ambiguity regarding the definition of "audit" and the scope of evaluations. Although algorithmic audits involve various activities, defining an effective audit can be complicated due to normative, technical, and resource limitations. Challenges abound, from the lack of standardized language to diverse auditor characteristics. Nevertheless, the need for holistic evaluation is imperative as the societal impacts of algorithms become more apparent. Bridging theory and practice, this dissertation seeks to provide insights into and considerations for the algorithmic auditing community. By drawing on the history of audit studies in the social sciences, confronting the challenges of performing an audit in practice, and investigating the broader auditing ecosystem, it explores questions around the purpose of an audit, methodologies and best practices, available resources, community growth, and accountability. By doing so, it aims to improve the efficacy of AI audits and accountability for AI systems.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Vecchione, Briana"],"institution":"Cornell University","degree_name":"Ph. D., Information Science","degree_level":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_discipline":"Information Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Barocas, Solon","Kleinberg, Jon"],"year":2023,"date_issued":"2023-12","date_published":"2023-12","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:49:00Z","subjects":["AI auditing","algorithmic auditing"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Attribution 4.0 International"],"rights_urls":["https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["http://doi.org/10.7298/9826-gh79"],"render_values":[{"text":"http://doi.org/10.7298/9826-gh79","href":"http://doi.org/10.7298/9826-gh79","code":true}]},{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["ProQuest Submission ID: 14034","ProQuest Publication ID: 30689365"],"render_values":[{"text":"ProQuest Submission ID: 14034","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"ProQuest Publication ID: 30689365","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/1813/115757","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Barocas, Solon","Kleinberg, Jon"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Vecchione, Briana"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2024-10-16T20:19:52Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2024-10-16T20:19:52Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2023-12"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["dissertation or thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Information Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph. D., Information Science"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Cornell University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["AI auditing","algorithmic auditing"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Attribution 4.0 International"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["http://doi.org/10.7298/9826-gh79"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["ProQuest Submission ID: 14034","ProQuest Publication ID: 30689365"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/1813/115757"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["243 pages"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The field of algorithmic auditing is witnessing remarkable growth in response to concerns around discrimination-related harms exhibited by AI systems. However, this expansion has brought ambiguity regarding the definition of \"audit\" and the scope of evaluations. Although algorithmic audits involve various activities, defining an effective audit can be complicated due to normative, technical, and resource limitations. Challenges abound, from the lack of standardized language to diverse auditor characteristics. Nevertheless, the need for holistic evaluation is imperative as the societal impacts of algorithms become more apparent. Bridging theory and practice, this dissertation seeks to provide insights into and considerations for the algorithmic auditing community. By drawing on the history of audit studies in the social sciences, confronting the challenges of performing an audit in practice, and investigating the broader auditing ecosystem, it explores questions around the purpose of an audit, methodologies and best practices, available resources, community growth, and accountability. By doing so, it aims to improve the efficacy of AI audits and accountability for AI systems."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Navigating the Complexities of Algorithmic Auditing: Challenges and Considerations"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Barocas, Solon","Kleinberg, Jon"],"dc:creator":["Vecchione, Briana"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2024-10-16T20:19:52Z"],"dc:date.available":["2024-10-16T20:19:52Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2023-12"],"dc:description":["243 pages"],"dc:description.abstract":["The field of algorithmic auditing is witnessing remarkable growth in response to concerns around discrimination-related harms exhibited by AI systems. However, this expansion has brought ambiguity regarding the definition of \"audit\" and the scope of evaluations. Although algorithmic audits involve various activities, defining an effective audit can be complicated due to normative, technical, and resource limitations. Challenges abound, from the lack of standardized language to diverse auditor characteristics. Nevertheless, the need for holistic evaluation is imperative as the societal impacts of algorithms become more apparent. Bridging theory and practice, this dissertation seeks to provide insights into and considerations for the algorithmic auditing community. By drawing on the history of audit studies in the social sciences, confronting the challenges of performing an audit in practice, and investigating the broader auditing ecosystem, it explores questions around the purpose of an audit, methodologies and best practices, available resources, community growth, and accountability. By doing so, it aims to improve the efficacy of AI audits and accountability for AI systems."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.doi":["http://doi.org/10.7298/9826-gh79"],"dc:identifier.other":["ProQuest Submission ID: 14034","ProQuest Publication ID: 30689365"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/1813/115757"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:rights":["Attribution 4.0 International"],"dc:rights.uri":["https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"],"dc:subject":["AI auditing","algorithmic auditing"],"dc:title":["Navigating the Complexities of Algorithmic Auditing: Challenges and Considerations"],"dc:type":["dissertation or thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Information Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph. D., Information Science"],"thesis:institution_name":["Cornell University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:49:00Z"}