{"id":{"repo_id":"cornell","oai_identifier":"oai:ecommons.cornell.edu:1813/111922"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/cornell/oai:ecommons.cornell.edu:1813/111922","repository":{"repo_id":"cornell","name":"Cornell University","base_url":"https://ecommons.cornell.edu/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The Consonant/Vowel Distinction: A Cognitive Difference Evidenced by Glides","abstract":"The consonant/vowel distinction is surprisingly poorly understood. Consonants and vowels are often distinguished either by constriction degree or syllable position, but neither of these is exceptionless. This dissertation presents a new account of the distinction: the Domain Prioritization Hypothesis. The underlying difference between consonants and vowels is that consonants prioritize the articulatory domain and vowels prioritize the acoustic domain. These domains are realized in the cognitive system largely through feedback processes. Evidence in support of this hypothesis comes from cross-linguistic and experimental data on glides, the most vowel-like consonants. The experimental results show differential patterns in the variances of articulatory and acoustic measurements and in responses to altered auditory feedback. Domain prioritization is formalized in the framework of Articulatory Phonology and Task Dynamics by expanding the possible functional coordinates for speech task goals to allow such goals to be represented in all sensory modalities: consonantal gestures aim to achieve targets defined in a functional space that is an abstraction of the vocal tract, but the appropriate functional space for vowel targets is instead an abstraction of acoustic formants. This approach has potential explanatory power with regard to a variety of phenomena related to the C/V distinction, including syllable structure and complex segments.","abstract_html":"The consonant/vowel distinction is surprisingly poorly understood. Consonants and vowels are often distinguished either by constriction degree or syllable position, but neither of these is exceptionless. This dissertation presents a new account of the distinction: the Domain Prioritization Hypothesis. The underlying difference between consonants and vowels is that consonants prioritize the articulatory domain and vowels prioritize the acoustic domain. These domains are realized in the cognitive system largely through feedback processes. Evidence in support of this hypothesis comes from cross-linguistic and experimental data on glides, the most vowel-like consonants. The experimental results show differential patterns in the variances of articulatory and acoustic measurements and in responses to altered auditory feedback. Domain prioritization is formalized in the framework of Articulatory Phonology and Task Dynamics by expanding the possible functional coordinates for speech task goals to allow such goals to be represented in all sensory modalities: consonantal gestures aim to achieve targets defined in a functional space that is an abstraction of the vocal tract, but the appropriate functional space for vowel targets is instead an abstraction of acoustic formants. This approach has potential explanatory power with regard to a variety of phenomena related to the C/V distinction, including syllable structure and complex segments.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Burgdorf, Dan Cameron"],"institution":"Cornell University","degree_name":"Ph. D., Linguistics","degree_level":"Doctor of Philosophy","degree_discipline":"Linguistics","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":["Cohn, Abigail C.","Zec, Draga"],"year":2022,"date_issued":"2022-08","date_published":"2022-08","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:49:10Z","subjects":["consonant/vowel distinction","feedback","glides","task dynamics","variance","vowels"],"languages":["en"],"rights":["Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International"],"rights_urls":["https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.7298/750z-f960"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://doi.org/10.7298/750z-f960","href":"https://doi.org/10.7298/750z-f960","code":true}]},{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["ProQuest Submission ID: 13292","ProQuest Publication ID: 29324061"],"render_values":[{"text":"ProQuest Submission ID: 13292","href":null,"code":true},{"text":"ProQuest Publication ID: 29324061","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://hdl.handle.net/1813/111922","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor.committeemember","label":"Committee Member","values":["Cohn, Abigail C.","Zec, Draga"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Burgdorf, Dan Cameron"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2022-10-31T16:19:48Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2022-10-31T16:19:48Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2022-08"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["dissertation or thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Linguistics"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctor of Philosophy"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Ph. D., Linguistics"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Cornell University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["consonant/vowel distinction","feedback","glides","task dynamics","variance","vowels"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["en"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International"]},{"key":"dc:rights.uri","label":"Rights URI","values":["https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.doi","label":"DOI","values":["https://doi.org/10.7298/750z-f960"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.other","label":"Dc Identifier Other","values":["ProQuest Submission ID: 13292","ProQuest Publication ID: 29324061"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://hdl.handle.net/1813/111922"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description","label":"Description","values":["220 pages"]},{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The consonant/vowel distinction is surprisingly poorly understood. Consonants and vowels are often distinguished either by constriction degree or syllable position, but neither of these is exceptionless. This dissertation presents a new account of the distinction: the Domain Prioritization Hypothesis. The underlying difference between consonants and vowels is that consonants prioritize the articulatory domain and vowels prioritize the acoustic domain. These domains are realized in the cognitive system largely through feedback processes. Evidence in support of this hypothesis comes from cross-linguistic and experimental data on glides, the most vowel-like consonants. The experimental results show differential patterns in the variances of articulatory and acoustic measurements and in responses to altered auditory feedback. Domain prioritization is formalized in the framework of Articulatory Phonology and Task Dynamics by expanding the possible functional coordinates for speech task goals to allow such goals to be represented in all sensory modalities: consonantal gestures aim to achieve targets defined in a functional space that is an abstraction of the vocal tract, but the appropriate functional space for vowel targets is instead an abstraction of acoustic formants. This approach has potential explanatory power with regard to a variety of phenomena related to the C/V distinction, including syllable structure and complex segments."]},{"key":"dc:format.mimetype","label":"Dc Format Mimetype","values":["application/pdf"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Consonant/Vowel Distinction: A Cognitive Difference Evidenced by Glides"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor.committeemember":["Cohn, Abigail C.","Zec, Draga"],"dc:creator":["Burgdorf, Dan Cameron"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2022-10-31T16:19:48Z"],"dc:date.available":["2022-10-31T16:19:48Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2022-08"],"dc:description":["220 pages"],"dc:description.abstract":["The consonant/vowel distinction is surprisingly poorly understood. Consonants and vowels are often distinguished either by constriction degree or syllable position, but neither of these is exceptionless. This dissertation presents a new account of the distinction: the Domain Prioritization Hypothesis. The underlying difference between consonants and vowels is that consonants prioritize the articulatory domain and vowels prioritize the acoustic domain. These domains are realized in the cognitive system largely through feedback processes. Evidence in support of this hypothesis comes from cross-linguistic and experimental data on glides, the most vowel-like consonants. The experimental results show differential patterns in the variances of articulatory and acoustic measurements and in responses to altered auditory feedback. Domain prioritization is formalized in the framework of Articulatory Phonology and Task Dynamics by expanding the possible functional coordinates for speech task goals to allow such goals to be represented in all sensory modalities: consonantal gestures aim to achieve targets defined in a functional space that is an abstraction of the vocal tract, but the appropriate functional space for vowel targets is instead an abstraction of acoustic formants. This approach has potential explanatory power with regard to a variety of phenomena related to the C/V distinction, including syllable structure and complex segments."],"dc:format.mimetype":["application/pdf"],"dc:identifier.doi":["https://doi.org/10.7298/750z-f960"],"dc:identifier.other":["ProQuest Submission ID: 13292","ProQuest Publication ID: 29324061"],"dc:identifier.uri":["https://hdl.handle.net/1813/111922"],"dc:language.iso":["en"],"dc:rights":["Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International"],"dc:rights.uri":["https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"],"dc:subject":["consonant/vowel distinction","feedback","glides","task dynamics","variance","vowels"],"dc:title":["The Consonant/Vowel Distinction: A Cognitive Difference Evidenced by Glides"],"dc:type":["dissertation or thesis"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Linguistics"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctor of Philosophy"],"thesis:degree_name":["Ph. D., Linguistics"],"thesis:institution_name":["Cornell University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:49:10Z"}