Abstract
dc:description.abstractIn this dissertation, I examine how analysts’ private connections to external peers across brokerages affect the quality of their research. I find that analysts with private connections (i.e., who are connected to external peers via past employment ties and covering the same firm) issue more accurate earnings forecasts than “unconnected” analysts. In addition, the effect of private connections on earnings forecast accuracy is more notable for analyst pairs who are, on average, employed by smaller brokerages, and who are, on average, less skilled, less experienced, and more resource constrained, thereby suggesting that private connections help to mitigate resource constraints and allow less skilled and less experienced analysts to improve their research through generating synergy. Importantly, the market underreacts to forecasts of privately connected analysts, leading to significant stock price drifts following forecast revisions. Using coverage terminations of connected peers as exogenous shocks to private connections, I find decreases in analyst forecast accuracy of the recipient analyst following coverage terminations of mutually covered stocks by connected peers due to permanent employment terminations of connected peers, brokerage terminations of the connected peers’ industry sector, and connected peers’ brokerage closures.
Degree
thesis:*- Name thesis:degree_name
- Ph. D., Management
- Level thesis:degree_level
- Doctor of Philosophy
- Discipline thesis:degree_discipline
- Management
- Grantor
- Cornell University
- Year dc:date.issued
- 2021
Author and committee
dc:creator, dc:contributor.*- Author dc:creator
-
- Kang, Charles Chao
- Committee members dc:contributor.committeemember
-
- Ng, David T.
- Zuo, Luo
Subjects
dc:subject × 4Rights
- Language dc:language.iso
- en
Identifiers
dc:identifier.*- Dc Identifier Other
-
ProQuest Submission ID: 12477
ProQuest Publication ID: 28490743 - OAI identifier oai:identifier
- oai:ecommons.cornell.edu:1813/109754