{"id":{"repo_id":"columbus-state","oai_identifier":"oai:csuepress.columbusstate.edu:theses_dissertations-1779"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/columbus-state/oai:csuepress.columbusstate.edu:theses_dissertations-1779","repository":{"repo_id":"columbus-state","name":"Columbus State University","base_url":"https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/do/oai/"},"display":{"title":"Writing Against The War Machine: Wiflred Owen's Poetic Challenge to World War I Pro-War Rhetoric","abstract":"<p>Wilfred Owen, a soldier-poet who fought in World War I, is often labeled an anti-war poet, with some claiming that he was against the war in its entirety. This thesis explores the opinion that Owen is not an anti-war poet but rather that he wrote against anti-pro-war rhetoric. This includes all types of pro-war rhetoric influential in England for recruitment purposes but mainly focuses on poetry that would be published in newspapers for everyday readers to see. Owen seems to specifically resist two types of pro-war rhetoric, the myth of the German barbarian and what he called the old lie. This thesis uses four of Owen’s poems to examine the differences between what soldiers saw on the Western Front versus what information civilians were given or what opinions they held. The four poems used are “Strange Meeting,” “Dulce et Decorum Est,” “Disabled,” and “Smile, Smile, Smile” to showcase Owen’s growing disillusionment, not with the war itself, but with the conversations and beliefs that non-soldiers held in England.</p>","abstract_html":"&lt;p&gt;Wilfred Owen, a soldier-poet who fought in World War I, is often labeled an anti-war poet, with some claiming that he was against the war in its entirety. This thesis explores the opinion that Owen is not an anti-war poet but rather that he wrote against anti-pro-war rhetoric. This includes all types of pro-war rhetoric influential in England for recruitment purposes but mainly focuses on poetry that would be published in newspapers for everyday readers to see. Owen seems to specifically resist two types of pro-war rhetoric, the myth of the German barbarian and what he called the old lie. This thesis uses four of Owen’s poems to examine the differences between what soldiers saw on the Western Front versus what information civilians were given or what opinions they held. The four poems used are “Strange Meeting,” “Dulce et Decorum Est,” “Disabled,” and “Smile, Smile, Smile” to showcase Owen’s growing disillusionment, not with the war itself, but with the conversations and beliefs that non-soldiers held in England.&lt;/p&gt;","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Woods, Elizabeth"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"English Language and Literature - Literature Concentration","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"English","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Dr. Patrick Jackson","Dr. Anna Dimitrova","Professor Matt Jarvis"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2026,"date_issued":"2026-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2026-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:45:25Z","subjects":["Wilfred Owen","World War I","Poet","England","Arts and Humanities","Literature in English, British Isles"],"languages":["English"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/theses_dissertations/791","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Dr. Patrick Jackson","Dr. Anna Dimitrova","Professor Matt Jarvis"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Woods, Elizabeth"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["English"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["English Language and Literature - Literature Concentration"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Wilfred Owen","World War I","Poet","England","Arts and Humanities","Literature in English, British Isles"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/theses_dissertations/791"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["<p>Wilfred Owen, a soldier-poet who fought in World War I, is often labeled an anti-war poet, with some claiming that he was against the war in its entirety. This thesis explores the opinion that Owen is not an anti-war poet but rather that he wrote against anti-pro-war rhetoric. This includes all types of pro-war rhetoric influential in England for recruitment purposes but mainly focuses on poetry that would be published in newspapers for everyday readers to see. Owen seems to specifically resist two types of pro-war rhetoric, the myth of the German barbarian and what he called the old lie. This thesis uses four of Owen’s poems to examine the differences between what soldiers saw on the Western Front versus what information civilians were given or what opinions they held. The four poems used are “Strange Meeting,” “Dulce et Decorum Est,” “Disabled,” and “Smile, Smile, Smile” to showcase Owen’s growing disillusionment, not with the war itself, but with the conversations and beliefs that non-soldiers held in England.</p>"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Writing Against The War Machine: Wiflred Owen's Poetic Challenge to World War I Pro-War Rhetoric"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Dr. Patrick Jackson","Dr. Anna Dimitrova","Professor Matt Jarvis"],"dc:creator":["Woods, Elizabeth"],"dc:description.abstract":["<p>Wilfred Owen, a soldier-poet who fought in World War I, is often labeled an anti-war poet, with some claiming that he was against the war in its entirety. This thesis explores the opinion that Owen is not an anti-war poet but rather that he wrote against anti-pro-war rhetoric. This includes all types of pro-war rhetoric influential in England for recruitment purposes but mainly focuses on poetry that would be published in newspapers for everyday readers to see. Owen seems to specifically resist two types of pro-war rhetoric, the myth of the German barbarian and what he called the old lie. This thesis uses four of Owen’s poems to examine the differences between what soldiers saw on the Western Front versus what information civilians were given or what opinions they held. The four poems used are “Strange Meeting,” “Dulce et Decorum Est,” “Disabled,” and “Smile, Smile, Smile” to showcase Owen’s growing disillusionment, not with the war itself, but with the conversations and beliefs that non-soldiers held in England.</p>"],"dc:identifier":["https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/theses_dissertations/791"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:subject":["Wilfred Owen","World War I","Poet","England","Arts and Humanities","Literature in English, British Isles"],"dc:title":["Writing Against The War Machine: Wiflred Owen's Poetic Challenge to World War I Pro-War Rhetoric"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["English"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["English Language and Literature - Literature Concentration"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:45:25Z"}