The purpose of this qualitative exploratory descriptive study was to explore the perceptions of F1 visa STEM international students at a four-year private university about their social engagement experiences with their American peers, and how the absence of such engagement practices frames the international students’ sense of mattering and marginality and overall college experience. The study focused only on F-1 visa international students’ perceptions and utilized the marginality and mattering theory (MMT) (Schlossberg, 1989) as a theoretical framework. The social constructivism paradigm was utilized to explain how international students construct their knowledge and perceptions of social engagement with American peers, and how their relative social engagement impacts their sense of mattering or marginality. The topic of international students in US colleges is not new in academia. Despite the impressive amount of literature on international students in US colleges, there is a gap in the literature on the social engagement between international STEM students and their and American counterparts, and international students’ sense of mattering and marginality. The rich qualitative data was collected using drawings and semi-structured interviews with participants that were selected via a convenient purposeful sampling. Data collected revealed that international students’ social engagement experiences with their American peers vary depending on race, gender, years in the US, program level, and athletic affiliation. The frequency and quality or lack of social engagement with their American peers influences international students’ sense of mattering and marginality.
","abstract_html":"<p>The purpose of this qualitative exploratory descriptive study was to explore the perceptions of F1 visa STEM international students at a four-year private university about their social engagement experiences with their American peers, and how the absence of such engagement practices frames the international students’ sense of mattering and marginality and overall college experience. The study focused only on F-1 visa international students’ perceptions and utilized the marginality and mattering theory (MMT) (Schlossberg, 1989) as a theoretical framework. The social constructivism paradigm was utilized to explain how international students construct their knowledge and perceptions of social engagement with American peers, and how their relative social engagement impacts their sense of mattering or marginality. The topic of international students in US colleges is not new in academia. Despite the impressive amount of literature on international students in US colleges, there is a gap in the literature on the social engagement between international STEM students and their and American counterparts, and international students’ sense of mattering and marginality. The rich qualitative data was collected using drawings and semi-structured interviews with participants that were selected via a convenient purposeful sampling. Data collected revealed that international students’ social engagement experiences with their American peers vary depending on race, gender, years in the US, program level, and athletic affiliation. The frequency and quality or lack of social engagement with their American peers influences international students’ sense of mattering and marginality.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Matikeeva-Kinney, Sairagul"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Doctor of Education","degree_level":"Dissertation","degree_discipline":"Teacher Education","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["Jennifer M. Lovelace PhD","Hanna Lainas PhD","Steven Wright PhD"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2024,"date_issued":"2024-01-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2024-01-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:44:41Z","subjects":["international STEM students","social engagement","mattering and marginality","American peers","mattering and marginality theory","US colleges and universities","Education"],"languages":["English"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/theses_dissertations/546","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["Jennifer M. Lovelace PhD","Hanna Lainas PhD","Steven Wright PhD"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Matikeeva-Kinney, Sairagul"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2024-12-13T08:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Teacher Education"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Dissertation"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Education"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["international STEM students","social engagement","mattering and marginality","American peers","mattering and marginality theory","US colleges and universities","Education"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/theses_dissertations/546"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["The purpose of this qualitative exploratory descriptive study was to explore the perceptions of F1 visa STEM international students at a four-year private university about their social engagement experiences with their American peers, and how the absence of such engagement practices frames the international students’ sense of mattering and marginality and overall college experience. The study focused only on F-1 visa international students’ perceptions and utilized the marginality and mattering theory (MMT) (Schlossberg, 1989) as a theoretical framework. The social constructivism paradigm was utilized to explain how international students construct their knowledge and perceptions of social engagement with American peers, and how their relative social engagement impacts their sense of mattering or marginality. The topic of international students in US colleges is not new in academia. Despite the impressive amount of literature on international students in US colleges, there is a gap in the literature on the social engagement between international STEM students and their and American counterparts, and international students’ sense of mattering and marginality. The rich qualitative data was collected using drawings and semi-structured interviews with participants that were selected via a convenient purposeful sampling. Data collected revealed that international students’ social engagement experiences with their American peers vary depending on race, gender, years in the US, program level, and athletic affiliation. The frequency and quality or lack of social engagement with their American peers influences international students’ sense of mattering and marginality.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["Social Engagement Gaps Between Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) F-1 Visa International Students and American Students in US Universities"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["Jennifer M. Lovelace PhD","Hanna Lainas PhD","Steven Wright PhD"],"dc:creator":["Matikeeva-Kinney, Sairagul"],"dc:date.available":["2024-12-13T08:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["The purpose of this qualitative exploratory descriptive study was to explore the perceptions of F1 visa STEM international students at a four-year private university about their social engagement experiences with their American peers, and how the absence of such engagement practices frames the international students’ sense of mattering and marginality and overall college experience. The study focused only on F-1 visa international students’ perceptions and utilized the marginality and mattering theory (MMT) (Schlossberg, 1989) as a theoretical framework. The social constructivism paradigm was utilized to explain how international students construct their knowledge and perceptions of social engagement with American peers, and how their relative social engagement impacts their sense of mattering or marginality. The topic of international students in US colleges is not new in academia. Despite the impressive amount of literature on international students in US colleges, there is a gap in the literature on the social engagement between international STEM students and their and American counterparts, and international students’ sense of mattering and marginality. The rich qualitative data was collected using drawings and semi-structured interviews with participants that were selected via a convenient purposeful sampling. Data collected revealed that international students’ social engagement experiences with their American peers vary depending on race, gender, years in the US, program level, and athletic affiliation. The frequency and quality or lack of social engagement with their American peers influences international students’ sense of mattering and marginality.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/theses_dissertations/546"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:subject":["international STEM students","social engagement","mattering and marginality","American peers","mattering and marginality theory","US colleges and universities","Education"],"dc:title":["Social Engagement Gaps Between Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) F-1 Visa International Students and American Students in US Universities"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Teacher Education"],"thesis:degree_level":["Dissertation"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Education"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:44:41Z"}