Nutrients are considered the second largest nonpoint source pollutant in Georgia's running water ecosystems. Nutrients can naturally occur in low amounts and are typically increased in streams as a result of industry, agriculture, silviculture, and urbanization. In large amounts, nutrients can cause many problems to occur in the stream ecosystem. Macroinvertebrates have been established as good indicators for determining the level of impairment of a stream; however, not much research has been done on how nutrients affect macroinvertebrates in a stream. Approximately 225 reference and impaired streams were sampled over a 3 - year field season, (index period from September to February), using the EPA's rapid bioassessment protocol (RBP). The concentrations of nutrients were measured in mg/L and ranged as follows: nitrite and nitrite/nitrate < 0.01 to >1.0, ammonia < 0.03 to 3.0, and phosphorous < 0.01 to 1.2. Analysis determined (1) the RBP has the potential to indicate nutrient loading; (2) nutrient parameters that were significantly different varied across the state, varied at ecoregion level and varied at subecoregion within an ecoregion; (3) the data indicated some correlations between nutrients and macroinvertebrate distribution, however the RBP was not a good indicator of nutrient loading in all ecoregions and subecoregions across the state; and (4) nutrient analysis should continue to be part of the rapid bioassessment protocol.
","abstract_html":"<p>Nutrients are considered the second largest nonpoint source pollutant in Georgia's running water ecosystems. Nutrients can naturally occur in low amounts and are typically increased in streams as a result of industry, agriculture, silviculture, and urbanization. In large amounts, nutrients can cause many problems to occur in the stream ecosystem. Macroinvertebrates have been established as good indicators for determining the level of impairment of a stream; however, not much research has been done on how nutrients affect macroinvertebrates in a stream. Approximately 225 reference and impaired streams were sampled over a 3 - year field season, (index period from September to February), using the EPA's rapid bioassessment protocol (RBP). The concentrations of nutrients were measured in mg/L and ranged as follows: nitrite and nitrite/nitrate < 0.01 to >1.0, ammonia < 0.03 to 3.0, and phosphorous < 0.01 to 1.2. Analysis determined (1) the RBP has the potential to indicate nutrient loading; (2) nutrient parameters that were significantly different varied across the state, varied at ecoregion level and varied at subecoregion within an ecoregion; (3) the data indicated some correlations between nutrients and macroinvertebrate distribution, however the RBP was not a good indicator of nutrient loading in all ecoregions and subecoregions across the state; and (4) nutrient analysis should continue to be part of the rapid bioassessment protocol.</p>","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Brossett, Paula Michele Pollock"],"institution":null,"degree_name":"Earth and Space Science - Environmental Science Track","degree_level":"Thesis","degree_discipline":"Earth & Space Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":["James A. Gore","Jeffrey Zuiderveen","William J. Frazier"],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2005,"date_issued":"2005-04-01T08:00:00Z","date_published":"2005-04-01T08:00:00Z","updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:44:48Z","subjects":["Nutrients","Nonpoint Source Pollution","Running Water Ecosystems","Georgia","Streams","Earth Sciences","Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment","Environmental Sciences"],"languages":["English"],"rights":[],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[]},"links":{"outbound_url":"https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/theses_dissertations/43","outbound_label":"Repository record","outbound_source":"dc:identifier"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:contributor","label":"Contributor","values":["James A. Gore","Jeffrey Zuiderveen","William J. Frazier"]},{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Brossett, Paula Michele Pollock"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2015-10-02T07:00:00Z"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Earth & Space Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Thesis"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Earth and Space Science - Environmental Science Track"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["Nutrients","Nonpoint Source Pollution","Running Water Ecosystems","Georgia","Streams","Earth Sciences","Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment","Environmental Sciences"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/theses_dissertations/43"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["Nutrients are considered the second largest nonpoint source pollutant in Georgia's running water ecosystems. Nutrients can naturally occur in low amounts and are typically increased in streams as a result of industry, agriculture, silviculture, and urbanization. In large amounts, nutrients can cause many problems to occur in the stream ecosystem. Macroinvertebrates have been established as good indicators for determining the level of impairment of a stream; however, not much research has been done on how nutrients affect macroinvertebrates in a stream. Approximately 225 reference and impaired streams were sampled over a 3 - year field season, (index period from September to February), using the EPA's rapid bioassessment protocol (RBP). The concentrations of nutrients were measured in mg/L and ranged as follows: nitrite and nitrite/nitrate < 0.01 to >1.0, ammonia < 0.03 to 3.0, and phosphorous < 0.01 to 1.2. Analysis determined (1) the RBP has the potential to indicate nutrient loading; (2) nutrient parameters that were significantly different varied across the state, varied at ecoregion level and varied at subecoregion within an ecoregion; (3) the data indicated some correlations between nutrients and macroinvertebrate distribution, however the RBP was not a good indicator of nutrient loading in all ecoregions and subecoregions across the state; and (4) nutrient analysis should continue to be part of the rapid bioassessment protocol.
"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The Effects of Nutrient Concentrations on Macroinvertebrate Distributions in Georgia"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:contributor":["James A. Gore","Jeffrey Zuiderveen","William J. Frazier"],"dc:creator":["Brossett, Paula Michele Pollock"],"dc:date.available":["2015-10-02T07:00:00Z"],"dc:description.abstract":["Nutrients are considered the second largest nonpoint source pollutant in Georgia's running water ecosystems. Nutrients can naturally occur in low amounts and are typically increased in streams as a result of industry, agriculture, silviculture, and urbanization. In large amounts, nutrients can cause many problems to occur in the stream ecosystem. Macroinvertebrates have been established as good indicators for determining the level of impairment of a stream; however, not much research has been done on how nutrients affect macroinvertebrates in a stream. Approximately 225 reference and impaired streams were sampled over a 3 - year field season, (index period from September to February), using the EPA's rapid bioassessment protocol (RBP). The concentrations of nutrients were measured in mg/L and ranged as follows: nitrite and nitrite/nitrate < 0.01 to >1.0, ammonia < 0.03 to 3.0, and phosphorous < 0.01 to 1.2. Analysis determined (1) the RBP has the potential to indicate nutrient loading; (2) nutrient parameters that were significantly different varied across the state, varied at ecoregion level and varied at subecoregion within an ecoregion; (3) the data indicated some correlations between nutrients and macroinvertebrate distribution, however the RBP was not a good indicator of nutrient loading in all ecoregions and subecoregions across the state; and (4) nutrient analysis should continue to be part of the rapid bioassessment protocol.
"],"dc:identifier":["https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/theses_dissertations/43"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:subject":["Nutrients","Nonpoint Source Pollution","Running Water Ecosystems","Georgia","Streams","Earth Sciences","Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment","Environmental Sciences"],"dc:title":["The Effects of Nutrient Concentrations on Macroinvertebrate Distributions in Georgia"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Earth & Space Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Thesis"],"thesis:degree_name":["Earth and Space Science - Environmental Science Track"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-24T01:44:48Z"}