Aftermath: Accounting for the Holocaust in the Czech Republic

Reparations are often theorized in the vein of juridical accountability: victims of historical injustices call states to account for their suffering; states, in a gesture that marks a restoration of the rule of law, acknowledge and repair these wrongs via financial compensation. But as reparations projects intersect with a consolidation of liberalism that, in the postsocialist Czech Republic, increasingly hinges on a politics of recognition, reparations concomitantly interpellate minority subjects as such, instantiating their precarious inclusion into the body politic in a way that vexes the both the historical justice and contemporary recognition reparatory projects seek. This dissertation analyzes claims made by Czech Romani Holocaust survivors in reparations programs, the social work apparatus through which they pursued their claims, and the often contradictory demands of the complex legal structures that have governed eligibility for reparations since the immediate aftermath of the war, and argues for an ethnographic examination of the forms of discrepant reciprocity and commensuration that underpin, and often foreclose, attempts to account for the Holocaust in contemporary Europe.

Author dc:creator

• Hegburg, Krista

• Anthropology
• Ethnology
• Romanies
• Romani Genocide (1939-1945)
• War reparations
• Social service

Language dc:language

English

DOI dc:identifier

https://doi.org/10.7916/D8251HM1

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:academiccommons.columbia.edu:10.7916/D8251HM1