A scenario-based technique to analyze UML design class models

Identifying and resolving design problems in the early design phases can help reduce the number of design errors in implementations. In this dissertation a tool-supported lightweight static analysis technique is proposed to rigorously analyze UML design class models that include operations specified using the Object Constraint Language (OCL). A UML design class model is analyzed against a given set of scenarios that describe desired or undesired behaviors. The technique can leverage existing class model analysis tools such as USE and OCLE. The analysis technique is lightweight in that it analyzes functionality specified in a UML design class model within the scope of a given set of scenarios. It is static because it does not require that the UML design class model be executable. The technique is used to (1) transform a UML design class model to a snapshot transition model that captures valid state transitions, (2) transform given scenarios to snapshot transitions and (3) determine if the snapshot transitions conform or not to the snapshot transition model. A design inconsistency exists if snapshot transitions that represent desired behaviors do not conform to the snapshot transition model, or if snapshot transitions representing undesired behaviors conform to the snapshot transition model. A Scenario-based UML Design Analysis tool was developed using Kermeta and the Eclipse Modeling Framework. The tool can be used to transform an Ecore design class model to a snapshot transition model and transform scenarios to snapshot transitions. The tool is integrated with the USE analysis tool. We used the Scenario-based UML Design Analysis technique to analyze two design class models: a Train Management System model and a Generalized Spatio-Temporal RBAC model. The two demonstration case studies show how the technique can be used to analyze the inconsistencies between UML design class models and scenarios. We performed a pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Scenario-based UML Design Analysis technique. In the pilot study the technique uncovered at least as many design inconsistencies as manual inspection techniques uncovered, and the technique did not uncover false inconsistencies. The pilot study provides some evidence that the Scenario-based UML Design Analysis technique is effective. The dissertation also proposes two scenario generation techniques. These techniques can be used to ease the manual effort needed to produce scenarios. The scenario generation techniques can be used to automatically generate a family of scenarios that conform to specified scenario generation criteria.

Name thesis:degree_name

Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Level thesis:degree_level

Doctoral

Discipline thesis:degree_discipline

Computer Science

Grantor dc:publisher

Colorado State University. Libraries

Year dc:date.issued

2014

Authors dc:creator

• Yu, Lijun, author
• France, Robert B., advisor
• Ray, Indrakshi, committee member
• Ghosh, Sudipto, committee member
• Malaiya, Yashwant, committee member
• Turk, Dan, committee member

• unified modeling language
• consistency check
• software engineering experiment
• scenario
• formal verification
• formal analysis

Statement dc:rights

• Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.

Language dc:language.iso

eng, English

Identifier URI

https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018740

OAI identifier oai:identifier

oai:mountainscholar.org:10217/82485