{"id":{"repo_id":"colostate","oai_identifier":"oai:mountainscholar.org:10217/71563"},"canonical_url":"https://search.dev.ndltd.org/etd/colostate/oai:mountainscholar.org:10217/71563","repository":{"repo_id":"colostate","name":"Colorado State University","base_url":"https://api.mountainscholar.org/server/oai/request"},"display":{"title":"The impacts of national security and sustainable development: comparative study of shared protected areas","abstract":"National security and sustainable development paradigms shape national goals, priorities and policy in shared protected areas. The two paradigms define the physical, economic, social, and political infrastructure of shared protected areas through competing frameworks of national interests and environmental protections. This comparative study builds on international thinking about the relationship between sustainable development to answer the hypothesis that national security impacts most the environmental pillar of sustainable development. The research methodology is a triangulation of comparative document analysis with qualitative and quantitative interviews for a rich description of the two paradigms in two shared protected areas. Sustainable development is assessed in the four park conservation management plans using the Lockwood and Kothari traditional versus emergent sustainable development indicators as independent variables and the organizing framework. The impacts of national security doctrine, policy and projects are systematically assessed on sustainable development in the parks. This research formalizes one step toward the study of national security and sustainable development and the challenges of developing environmental protections in a national security environment.","abstract_html":"National security and sustainable development paradigms shape national goals, priorities and policy in shared protected areas. The two paradigms define the physical, economic, social, and political infrastructure of shared protected areas through competing frameworks of national interests and environmental protections. This comparative study builds on international thinking about the relationship between sustainable development to answer the hypothesis that national security impacts most the environmental pillar of sustainable development. The research methodology is a triangulation of comparative document analysis with qualitative and quantitative interviews for a rich description of the two paradigms in two shared protected areas. Sustainable development is assessed in the four park conservation management plans using the Lockwood and Kothari traditional versus emergent sustainable development indicators as independent variables and the organizing framework. The impacts of national security doctrine, policy and projects are systematically assessed on sustainable development in the parks. This research formalizes one step toward the study of national security and sustainable development and the challenges of developing environmental protections in a national security environment.","abstract_has_math":false,"creators":["Harwell, Janeane, author","Mumme, Steve, advisor","Stevis, Dimitris, committee member","Velasco, Marcela, committee member","Kneller, Jane, committee member"],"institution":"Colorado State University. Libraries","degree_name":"Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)","degree_level":"Doctoral","degree_discipline":"Political Science","degree_department":null,"school":null,"contributors":[],"advisors":[],"committee_chairs":[],"committee_members":[],"year":2012,"date_issued":"2012","date_published":"2012","updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:13:20Z","subjects":["border politics","ecosystems","environment","national security","shared protected areas","sustainable development"],"languages":["eng","English"],"rights":["Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright."],"rights_urls":[],"identifier_entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018889"],"render_values":[{"text":"https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018889","href":"https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018889","code":true}]},{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["ETDF2012500304POLS"],"render_values":[{"text":"ETDF2012500304POLS","href":null,"code":true}]}]},"links":{"outbound_url":"http://hdl.handle.net/10217/71563","outbound_label":"Handle","outbound_source":"dc:identifier.uri"},"metadata_groups":[{"id":"people","label":"People","entries":[{"key":"dc:creator","label":"Author","values":["Harwell, Janeane, author","Mumme, Steve, advisor","Stevis, Dimitris, committee member","Velasco, Marcela, committee member","Kneller, Jane, committee member"]}]},{"id":"academic_context","label":"Academic Context","entries":[{"key":"dc:date.accessioned","label":"Dc Date Accessioned","values":["2007-01-03T08:26:21Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.available","label":"Dc Date Available","values":["2007-01-03T08:26:21Z"]},{"key":"dc:date.issued","label":"Date","values":["2012"]},{"key":"dc:publisher","label":"Institution","values":["Colorado State University. Libraries"]},{"key":"dc:type","label":"Dc Type","values":["Text"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_discipline","label":"Discipline","values":["Political Science"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_level","label":"Degree Level","values":["Doctoral"]},{"key":"thesis:degree_name","label":"Degree Name","values":["Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)"]},{"key":"thesis:institution_name","label":"Thesis Institution Name","values":["Colorado State University"]}]},{"id":"subjects_keywords","label":"Subjects and Keywords","entries":[{"key":"dc:subject","label":"Dc Subject","values":["border politics","ecosystems","environment","national security","shared protected areas","sustainable development"]}]},{"id":"language_rights","label":"Language and Rights","entries":[{"key":"dc:language","label":"Dc Language","values":["English"]},{"key":"dc:language.iso","label":"Language (ISO)","values":["eng"]},{"key":"dc:rights","label":"Dc Rights","values":["Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright."]}]},{"id":"identifiers","label":"Identifiers","entries":[{"key":"dc:identifier","label":"Identifier","values":["Harwell_colostate_0053A_11546.pdf","ETDF2012500304POLS"]},{"key":"dc:identifier.uri","label":"Identifier URI","values":["http://hdl.handle.net/10217/71563","https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018889"]}]},{"id":"additional","label":"Additional Metadata","entries":[{"key":"dc:description.abstract","label":"Abstract","values":["National security and sustainable development paradigms shape national goals, priorities and policy in shared protected areas. The two paradigms define the physical, economic, social, and political infrastructure of shared protected areas through competing frameworks of national interests and environmental protections. This comparative study builds on international thinking about the relationship between sustainable development to answer the hypothesis that national security impacts most the environmental pillar of sustainable development. The research methodology is a triangulation of comparative document analysis with qualitative and quantitative interviews for a rich description of the two paradigms in two shared protected areas. Sustainable development is assessed in the four park conservation management plans using the Lockwood and Kothari traditional versus emergent sustainable development indicators as independent variables and the organizing framework. The impacts of national security doctrine, policy and projects are systematically assessed on sustainable development in the parks. This research formalizes one step toward the study of national security and sustainable development and the challenges of developing environmental protections in a national security environment."]},{"key":"dc:format.medium","label":"Dc Format Medium","values":["born digital","doctoral dissertations"]},{"key":"dc:title","label":"Title","values":["The impacts of national security and sustainable development: comparative study of shared protected areas"]}]}],"canonical_facts":{"dc:creator":["Harwell, Janeane, author","Mumme, Steve, advisor","Stevis, Dimitris, committee member","Velasco, Marcela, committee member","Kneller, Jane, committee member"],"dc:date.accessioned":["2007-01-03T08:26:21Z"],"dc:date.available":["2007-01-03T08:26:21Z"],"dc:date.issued":["2012"],"dc:description.abstract":["National security and sustainable development paradigms shape national goals, priorities and policy in shared protected areas. The two paradigms define the physical, economic, social, and political infrastructure of shared protected areas through competing frameworks of national interests and environmental protections. This comparative study builds on international thinking about the relationship between sustainable development to answer the hypothesis that national security impacts most the environmental pillar of sustainable development. The research methodology is a triangulation of comparative document analysis with qualitative and quantitative interviews for a rich description of the two paradigms in two shared protected areas. Sustainable development is assessed in the four park conservation management plans using the Lockwood and Kothari traditional versus emergent sustainable development indicators as independent variables and the organizing framework. The impacts of national security doctrine, policy and projects are systematically assessed on sustainable development in the parks. This research formalizes one step toward the study of national security and sustainable development and the challenges of developing environmental protections in a national security environment."],"dc:format.medium":["born digital","doctoral dissertations"],"dc:identifier":["Harwell_colostate_0053A_11546.pdf","ETDF2012500304POLS"],"dc:identifier.uri":["http://hdl.handle.net/10217/71563","https://doi.org/10.25675/3.018889"],"dc:language":["English"],"dc:language.iso":["eng"],"dc:publisher":["Colorado State University. Libraries"],"dc:rights":["Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright."],"dc:subject":["border politics","ecosystems","environment","national security","shared protected areas","sustainable development"],"dc:title":["The impacts of national security and sustainable development: comparative study of shared protected areas"],"dc:type":["Text"],"thesis:degree_discipline":["Political Science"],"thesis:degree_level":["Doctoral"],"thesis:degree_name":["Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)"],"thesis:institution_name":["Colorado State University"]},"updated_at":"2026-07-27T19:13:20Z"}